Interventional AI-Human Collaboration for Liver Tumor Diagnosis

November 14, 2025 updated by: Yu Shi, Shengjing Hospital

AI-human Collaborative Diagnosis of Liver Tumors Using CE-CT

Recent advances in artificial intelligence (AI), particularly deep learning technology, have transformed medical imaging analysis. AI systems have demonstrated diagnostic performance comparable to or exceeding that of expert radiologists in specific tasks. Liver-focused AI diagnostic systems have achieved promising results in multi-center validations; however, these retrospective studies have not yet addressed two critical gaps. First, large-scale prospective trials are required to establish real-world clinical effectiveness. Second, it remains unclear whether AI can be organically embedded into clinical diagnostic workflows to reshape diagnostic and therapeutic pathways, particularly by enhancing the detection and follow-up of hepatic malignancies and ultimately improving patient outcomes.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of AI-human collaboration in liver tumor diagnosis by embedding real-time AI analysis into conventional multiphasic contrast-enhanced CT (CE-CT) workflows. Specifically, this prospective validation trial will assess diagnostic performance in detecting and characterizing hepatic lesions, particularly malignancies, evaluate the feasibility and efficiency of workflow integration, and determine the potential clinical impact on treatment decision-making and patient management.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
10333

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • China
    • Liaoning
      • Shenyang, Liaoning, China, 110004
        • Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age range 18 years and above
  2. Underwent dynamic contrast-enhanced abdominal CT examination with liver coverage
  3. Imaging must include at least three required phases: non-contrast, arterial phase, and venous phase; an delayed phase is optional
  4. Complete imaging data that meet AI system analysis requirements.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. History of recent upper-abdominal surgery (within 30 days) or major hepatobiliary-pancreatic surgery affecting liver evaluation (e.g., liver transplantation or Whipple procedure); patients with prior simple cholecystectomy or single-lesion interventional procedures are not excluded
  2. History of recent hepatic trauma (within 30 days)
  3. Poor image quality or severe noise artifacts (e.g., metal or motion artifacts)
  4. Missing required imaging phases (required at least non-contrast, arterial, and venous phases) or inadequate scan range (e.g., lower-abdomen CT such as pelvic or rectal scans not covering the liver)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: AI-human collaboration in CE-CT diagnosis for liver lesions
In the prospective analysis phase, patients undergo routine Multiphasic Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomography (CE-CT) imaging. The scans are evaluated through two parallel pathways: standard radiologist interpretation (without AI input) and independent AI analysis. When diagnostic discrepancies occur, a senior radiologist or multidisciplinary expert panel reviews the case and provides the definitive diagnosis.
Diagnostic test: AI-human collaboration for CE-CTs diagnosis
The system automatically processes all eligible same-day scans and generates results for review the following day. To maintain efficient AI-human collaboration while preserving the standard clinical workflow, the conventional radiological interpretation process remains unchanged (first-line radiologists provide initial reports followed by senior radiologists' review). A dedicated senior radiologist then evaluates any discordances between AI findings and primary radiological report. For complex cases, the review process escalates to a consensus review panel (i.e., pre-designated senior radiologists, Multidisciplinary Team (MDT)). The MDT can recommend clinical interventions including follow-up (e.g., additional imaging examinations, active surveillance), surgical procedures, or adjustments to adjuvant therapy (initiation or modification of treatment regimens). All discordant cases and their outcomes are systematically documented for longitudinal tracking and follow-up analysis.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Diagnostic accuracy of the AI System for malignancy diagnosis
Time Frame: Up to 90 days
Measures the patient-level diagnostic accuracy of the AI system for differentiating malignant vs. non-malignant lesions. The primary metric is the Area under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve (AUC). The primary analysis will test the one-sided superiority hypothesis H1: AUC > 0.90 against H0: AUC <= 0.90. The trial will be considered successful if the lower bound of the 95% Confidence Interval (CI) for the AUC is greater than 0.90.
Up to 90 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Secondary diagnostic performance
Time Frame: Up to 90 days
Measures the patient-level diagnostic performance of the AI system for malignant versus non-malignant classification. Metrics include sensitivity, specificity, Positive Predictive Value (PPV), and Negative Predictive Value (NPV). These will be calculated from the continuous probability score using a fixed operating point prior to prospective analysis.
Up to 90 days
Lesion screening performance
Time Frame: Up to 90 days
Measures the patient-level screening ability of the AI system to distinguish patients with any lesion from those with no lesions. This is a binary classification task (AUC) comparing lesion patient (malignant or benign) versus no lesion (normal liver or diffuse disease only).
Up to 90 days
Detection discordance
Time Frame: Up to 90 days
Measures the number of FLLs identified by the AI-human collaborative workflow that were overlooked by the initial radiologist report. An overlooked lesion is defined as an event meeting all three criteria: (1) detected by the AI system; (2) not described in the initial radiological report; (3) confirmed as a true lesion by senior radiologist/MDT re-review.
Up to 90 days
Amended radiological report
Time Frame: Up to 90 days
Measures the number of formal addenda issued to finalized radiology reports. An amended report is defined as a formal addendum that explicitly corrects a diagnosis or adds a previously missed finding based on the AI-human collaborative review.
Up to 90 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Shengjing Hospital

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Yu Shi, MD PhD, Shengjing Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
September 1, 2025

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
October 29, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
November 7, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
August 26, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 26, 2025

First Posted (Estimated)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
September 4, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
November 18, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 14, 2025

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
November 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • SH-CMU-FLL-Intervention

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

We plan to share IPD related to abdominal dynamic-contrast enhanced CT scans and clinical outcomes for hepatic tumor diagnosis.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings