Comparative Study Between Rezum and Tamsulosin
Comparison Between Convective Radiofrequency Water Vapor Thermal Ablation (REZUM) Versus Tamsulosin in Management of Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms in Patients With Benign Prostatic Enlargement
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Nozha
-
Cairo, Nozha, Egypt, 4470351
- The Armed Forces College of Medicine (AFCM
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- with prostate volumes of 30- 80 mL,
- mild to mod LUTS
- (maximum urinary flow rate [Q max] of <15 mL/s
- International Prostate Symptom Score [IPSS] of >13)
- PVR urine < 250 ml
Exclusion Criteria:
- prostate cancer,
- neurogenic bladder
- urethral stricture,
- urinary bladder stone
- previous prostatic surgery
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Rezum group
47 patient underwent Rezum therapy
|
Rezum procedure in Rezum group
|
|
Active Comparator: tamsulosin group
47 patients were given Tamsulosin medical treatment
|
Tamsulosin were given to Tamsulosin group
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
The International Prostate Symptom score (IPSS)
Time Frame: Time Frame: for each case in both groups the investigator assess IPSS at 3, 6, 12 after procedures through study completion, an average of 1 year
|
Measurement of The International Prostate Symptom score (IPSS) in both groups After 3, 6, 12 months of operation, the questioner is performed.
Minimum :0 / Maximum : 35 Total score: 0-7 Mildly symptomatic; 8-19 moderately symptomatic; 20-35 severely symptomatic
|
Time Frame: for each case in both groups the investigator assess IPSS at 3, 6, 12 after procedures through study completion, an average of 1 year
|
|
The Maximum Urinary flow rate (Qmax)
Time Frame: Time Frame: for each case in both groups the investigator assess Qmax at 3, 6, 12 months after procedures through study completion, an average of 1year
|
Measurement of The Maximum Urinary flow rate (Qmax) in both groups After 3, 6, 12 months of operation, the procedure is performed.
Qmax is measured by (ml/sec) Normal values are described as a Qmax above 15 ml/sec and below 10 ml/sec is considered abnormal
|
Time Frame: for each case in both groups the investigator assess Qmax at 3, 6, 12 months after procedures through study completion, an average of 1year
|
|
The Quality of Life (QoL)
Time Frame: [Time Frame: for each case in both groups the investigator assess QoL at 3, 6, 12 months after procedures through study completion, an average of 1 year
|
Measurement of The Quality of Life (QoL) in both groups After 3, 6, 12 months of operation, the questioner is performed.
Minimum :0 means delighted / Maximum : 5 means unhappy
|
[Time Frame: for each case in both groups the investigator assess QoL at 3, 6, 12 months after procedures through study completion, an average of 1 year
|
|
The Prostate size
Time Frame: Time Frame: for each case in both groups the investigator assess prostate size at 3, 6, 12 months after procedures through study completion, an average of 1 year.
|
the prostate size was measured by grams by Trans-rectal ultra sound
|
Time Frame: for each case in both groups the investigator assess prostate size at 3, 6, 12 months after procedures through study completion, an average of 1 year.
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Incidence of complications
Time Frame: through 1 year
|
For each case in both groups the investigator assess the safety using incidence of complications by The Clavien-Dindo system.
It uses a 5-grade scale (I-V), to classify complications from minor issues not requiring intervention (Grade I) to death (Grade V).
|
through 1 year
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
Helpful Links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimated)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimated)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- Rezum procedure for BPH
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.