Motor-Cognitive Training for Motoric Cognitive Risk Syndrome (VRTT for MCR)
The goal of this clinical trial is to investigate if combined motor-cognitive training can improve motor and cognitive symptoms in older adults with motoric cognitive risk syndrome. The main questions it aims to answer are:
- Does motor-cognitive training using a virtual reality treadmill improve gait speed?
- Does motor-cognitive training using a virtual reality treadmill improve cognitive functions?
Researchers will compare virtual reality treadmill training with treadmill training to see if virtual reality treadmill training works to improve motor and cognitive functions in older adults at risk of dementia
Participants will
- Complete 18 sessions (1 hour, 3x/week, 6 weeks) of either virtual reality treadmill training or treadmill training
- Complete a pre- and post-training assessment
- Wear an activity sensor for seven days prior to the pre-training assessment and for seven days after the post-training assessment.
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Hannes Devos, PhD
- Phone Number: 913-588-8253
- Email: hdevos@kumc.edu
Study Locations
-
-
Kansas
-
Kansas City, Kansas, United States, 66160
- University of Kansas Medical Center
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age ≥ 65
- English speaking
- Normal cognition (CDR=0)
- Meet MCR criteria
- Voluntary consent
Exclusion Criteria:
- Major chronic unstable disease or neurological condition (e.g., seizures)
- Diagnosed dementia
- Active psychiatric conditions
- Musculoskeletal conditions that affect walking for more than 2 minutes
- Severe visual or hearing impairments
- Sedating drugs (new use of narcotics or anxiolytics within the past month or chronic use that causes sedation)
- Currently engaged in other non-pharmacological interventions to improve cognition or walking
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Virtual Reality Treadmill Training
The virtual reality treadmill training (VRTT) group will complete 18 training sessions over six weeks (three 1-hour sessions per week).
Participants will perform prescribed tasks designed to challenge motor, cognitive, and motor-cognitive functions within a VR environment projected onto a screen in front of the treadmill (Fig 1).
The VRTT system includes a conventional treadmill with a harness suspension system, camera-based motion capture (Intel RealSense, Santa Clara, CA), and a computer-generated simulation (GaitBetter, Tel Aviv, Israel).
The camera tracks the participant's feet movements, which are displayed within the VR environment, allowing participants to see their feet navigating obstacles, pathways, and narrow corridors.
Each session will include three walking bouts interspersed with rest breaks, targeting at least 40 minutes of active motor-cognitive training.
|
The Virtual Reality Treadmill Training (VRTT) group will complete 18 training sessions over six weeks (three 1-hour sessions per week).
Participants will perform prescribed tasks designed to challenge motor, cognitive, and motor-cognitive functions within a VR environment projected onto a screen in front of the treadmill (Fig 1).
The VRTT system includes a conventional treadmill with a harness suspension system, camera-based motion capture (Intel RealSense, Santa Clara, CA), and a computer-generated simulation (GaitBetter, Tel Aviv, Israel).
The camera tracks the participant's feet movements, which are displayed within the VR environment, allowing participants to see their feet navigating obstacles, pathways, and narrow corridors.
Each session will include three walking bouts interspersed with rest breaks, targeting at least 40 minutes of active motor-cognitive training.
|
|
Active Comparator: Treadmill Training
Participants in the treadmill training (TT) intervention will follow a traditional TT program without feedback from the VR system.
70 The focus will be on increasing gait speed and distance, with no motor-cognitive training such as obstacle crossing or cognitive tasks while walking.
|
Participants in the Treadmill Training (TT) intervention will follow a traditional TT program without feedback from the VR system.
70 The focus will be on increasing gait speed and distance, with no motor-cognitive training such as obstacle crossing or cognitive tasks while walking.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Dual-task gait speed
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 6 weeks
|
2 trials of 2-minute walking on a 10-meter walkway while completing auditory oddball task
|
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 6 weeks
|
|
Cognition
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 6 weeks
|
Uniform Data Set (UDS) 4.0 global cognition composite score
|
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 6 weeks
|
|
Gait speed
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 6 weeks
|
Gait speed on 4-meter walk test (4MWT)
|
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 6 weeks
|
|
Cognitive complaints
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 6 weeks
|
Self-report of cognitive complaints based on memory item of the Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS): yes - no
|
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 6 weeks
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Spatiotemporal gait characteristics
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 6 weeks
|
Inertial Motion Units will collect spatiotemporal gait characteristics during single-task and dual-task walking
|
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 6 weeks
|
|
Cognitive domain scores
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 6 weeks
|
Uniform Data Set 4.0 (UDS) cognitive domain scores
|
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 6 weeks
|
|
P3 event-related potential (ERP)
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 6 weeks
|
P3 event-related potential (ERP) extracted from electroencephalography during oddball test
|
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 6 weeks
|
|
Mitochondrial function
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 6 weeks
|
Mitochondrial functional index collected from blood serum
|
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 6 weeks
|
|
Dual task cost
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 6 weeks
|
Motor and cognitive dual task cost defined using ((dual task - single task) / single task) * 100
|
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 6 weeks
|
Other Outcome Measures
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Real-world physical activity and gait data
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 6 weeks
|
Physical activity and gait data collected from activity sensors
|
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 6 weeks
|
|
Depression
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 6 weeks
|
Scores on the Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS): range 0 - 15; higher score is worse
|
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 6 weeks
|
|
Health-related Quality of life
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 6 weeks
|
Scores on Short Form 36 (SF-36): range 0 - 100; higher score is better
|
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 6 weeks
|
|
Frailty
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 6 weeks
|
Scores on the Evaluative Frailty Index for Physical Activity (EFIPA): range 0 - 1; higher score is worse
|
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 6 weeks
|
|
Falls
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 6 weeks
|
Self-report of falls via falls diaries
|
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 6 weeks
|
|
Resilience
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 6 weeks
|
Brief Resilience Scale (BRS): range 6 - 30; higher scores are better
|
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 6 weeks
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 00161860
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.