The Efficacy and Safety of Pregabalin Combined With Dexmedetomidine in Patients With Fibromyalgia

November 22, 2025 updated by: Fang Luo, Beijing Tiantan Hospital

Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Pregabalin Monotherapy With Pregabalin Combined Dexmedetomidine in the Treatment of Fibromyalgia: A Multicenter Clinical Study

Fibromyalgia (FM) is a chronic pain syndrome characterized by widespread pain, fatigue, and emotional disorders. Its onset is related to factors such as central sensitization and imbalance of neurotransmitters. The current mainstream treatments include pregabalin, but the efficacy of pregabalin is limited, with only 25%-40% pain relief rate, and adverse reactions are common. Dexmedetomidine, a highly selective α2-adrenergic receptors agonist, could improve sleep disorders, making it a possible treatment option for treating FM. The investigators hypothesize that the combination of pregabalin with dexmedetomidine may offer greater pain relief compared pregabalin monotherapy, without a significant increase in adverse effects for patients with FM.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
400

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • China
      • Beijing, China
        • Recruiting
        • Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Beijing, Beijing 100070
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosed with FM according to the 2016 Revisions to the 2010/2011 FM diagnostic criteria;
  • Aged 18 years or older;
  • Experiencing moderate to severe FM that have not been effectively alleviated by non-pharmacological treatments and has not received currently recommended pharmacological treatment for FM;
  • Numeric rating scale (NRS) score ≥ 4 at baseline;
  • Aspartate aminotransferase and alanine aminotransferase levels less than twice the upper limit of normal;
  • Estimated glomerular filtration rate of 30 mL/min per 1.73 m2 or higher;
  • Willing to sign the informed consent form and possessing sufficient cognitive and language abilities to comply with all the study requirements.

Exclusion criteria

  • History of hypersensitivity to pregabalin, venlafaxine or any of its excipients;
  • History of epilepsy, or depression requiring antidepressant medications;
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding;
  • Presence of serious systemic diseases, including uncontrolled hypertension, uncontrolled diabetes, or significant cardiac dysfunction;
  • With acute or chronic pain conditions other than FM.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: Monotherapy group
Pregabalin
Drug: Pregabalin
In the pregabalin monotherapy group, pregabalin will be initiated at 150 mg daily, divided into 2 or 3 doses per day, and increased to 300 mg per day after 3 to 7 days, subsequent increases of 150 mg daily may occur every 3 to 7 days, based on individual patient response and tolerability, with a maximum dose of 600 mg daily.
Experimental: Combination therapy group
Pregabalin with dexmedetomidine
Drug: Pregabalin with dexmedetomidine
In the pregabalin with dexmedetodimine group, the dose titration of pregabalin is identical with pregabalin monotherapy group. The dose of dexmedetomidine administered via nasal spray is 4 sprays per day, with 1 spray in each nostril on both sides. The spray should be held for about 30 seconds before another 1 spray is administered in each nostril. A total of 4 sprays are given. The total dosage is 100 μg.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The average pain intensity
Time Frame: At the 4-weeks
The average pain intensity over the past 24 hours, rated each morning upon awakening and averaged over 7 days at the 4 weeks. This will be measured based on NRS, where 0 represents no pain and 10 represents worst pain imaginable.
At the 4-weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The worst pain intensity
Time Frame: At the weeks 1, 2, 4, and 8
The worst pain intensity over the past 24 hours, rated each morning upon awakening and averaged over 7 days. The pain intensity will be measured based on NRS, where 0 represents no pain and 10 represents worst pain imaginable.
At the weeks 1, 2, 4, and 8
The proportion of patients achieving pain reduction
Time Frame: At the weeks 1, 2, 4, and 8
The proportion of patients achieving a ≥ 50% and ≥ 30% reduction in mean baseline pain intensity. The pain intensity will be measured based on NRS, where 0 represents no pain and 10 represents worst pain imaginable.
At the weeks 1, 2, 4, and 8
The Revised FM Impact Questionnaire
Time Frame: At the weeks 1, 2, 4, and 8
The Revised FM Impact Questionnaire assesses the severity of FM symptoms and their impact on daily functioning. It evaluates three linked domains: function, overall impact, and symptoms, using a 0 to10 NRS. The total score ranges from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating greater disease burden.
At the weeks 1, 2, 4, and 8
The short-form 36 Health Survey (SF-36)
Time Frame: At the weeks 1, 2, 4, and 8
The SF-36 assesses health-related quality of life, capturing preferences across various health states. It assesses 8 dimensions: physical functioning, physical role limitations due to physical health, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, emotional role limitations due to emotional problems, and mental health. Scores range from 0 to 100 for each dimension, with higher scores indicating better health status.
At the weeks 1, 2, 4, and 8
The Medical Outcomes Study Sleep Scale (MOS)
Time Frame: At the weeks 1, 2, 4, and 8
The MOS is a questionnaire comprising 12 items that assess various aspects of sleep using a 6-point ordinal scale (1 indicating permanence and 6 indicating absence).
At the weeks 1, 2, 4, and 8
The Beck Depression Inventory-Ⅱ (BD-Ⅱ)
Time Frame: At the weeks 1, 2, 4, and 8
The BD-Ⅱ evaluates the severity of depressive symptoms using a 4-point scale from 0 to 3, where 0 indicates no symptom and 3 indicates severe symptomatology. It comprises 21 items, the total score ranging from 0 to 63.
At the weeks 1, 2, 4, and 8
Adverse Events
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 8 weeks
The incidence and proportion of adverse events will be recorded and categorized as mild, moderate, severe, or life-threatening. AEs are defined as events that arise during treatment, were absent before treatment, or worsen relative to the pretreatment state.
Through study completion, an average of 8 weeks
The Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) severity (BPI-S) and interfere (BPI-I) subscales
Time Frame: At the weeks 1, 2, 4, and 8
BPI-S accesses pain intensity over the past 24 hours, calculated as the average of items 3 to 6 on the BPI, scored using a 0 to 10 NRS. In the NRS scale, 0 indicates no pain, while 10 represents the worst pain imaginable. The total score ranges from 0 to 40, with higher scores indicating greater pain severity. BPI-I evaluates the degree to which pain interferes with daily activities, including general activity, mood, mobility work, relationships, sleep, and pleasure. This subscale comprises 7 items, each scored from 0 (no interference) to 10 (complete interference), with a total score ranging from 0 to 70.
At the weeks 1, 2, 4, and 8

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Beijing Tiantan Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
September 30, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
June 30, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
August 31, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
November 13, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 13, 2025

First Posted (Estimated)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
November 17, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
November 28, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 22, 2025

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
November 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • KY2025-217-03-07

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Individual participant data that underlie the results reported in this article, after de-identification (text, tables, figures and appendices) are available. Derived data supporting the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author Fang Luo on request.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Fibromyalgia

Clinical Trials on Pregabalin

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings