Lymphovenous Bypass Procedure for Secondary Prevention of Lymphedema in Breast Cancer

November 14, 2025 updated by: Bayu Brahma, Dharmais National Cancer Center Hospital

Effectiveness of Lymphovenous Bypass Procedure for Secondary Prevention of Lymphedema in Breast Cancer

This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of the Lymphovenous Bypass (LVB) procedure compared to physiotherapy alone as secondary prevention of lymphedema in breast cancer patients undergoing axillary lymph node dissection.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

In the intervention group, LVB was performed with intima-to-intima coaptation using the super microsurgery technique. The anastomosis was between the afferent lymphatic vessel and the recipient vein. The upper extremity lymphedema (UEL) index and indocyanine green (ICG) lymphography are utilized to evaluate the progression of lymphedema.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
136

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • Indonesia
    • Jakarta Special Capital Region
      • Jakarta, Jakarta Special Capital Region, Indonesia, 11420
        • Recruiting
        • Dharmais National Cancer Center
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Breast cancer patients aged ≥ 18 years with an ECOG score > 1
  • Breast cancer patients with post-axillary lymph node dissection diagnosed with stage 0 and I lymphedema.
  • Those who have never undergone lymphedema physiotherapy.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with dermal backflow before axillary lymph node dissection (ALND).
  • Patients with breast cancer lymphedema who are unable to undergo a 24-month follow-up at Dharmais Cancer Hospital.
  • Patients with iodine allergy, severe asthma, decreased kidney function, pregnancy, or breastfeeding.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Lymphovenous bypass (LVB)
Sixty-eight subjects will be needed per group. LVB was performed by creating an intima-to-intima anastomosis between the afferent lymphatic vessels and the recipient veins. After surgery, follow-up will be done every 6 months for 2 years. During follow-up, a comprehensive evaluation will be performed, including history and physical examinations, radiological and histopathological examinations, UEL index, ICG lymphography, and quality-of-life evaluation. Each subject will complete the Lymphedema Quality of Life Questionnaire.
Procedure: Lymphovenous bypass (LVB)
The Lymphovenous Bypass (LVB) procedure in this study is a microsurgical supermicrosurgery-based intervention specifically designed for the secondary prevention of breast cancer-related lymphedema following axillary lymph node dissection.
No Intervention: Physiotherapy
Sixty-eight subjects will be needed per group. Patients will receive physiotherapy from trained physiotherapists. The protocol includes manual lymphatic drainage (massage techniques), compression, skin care, and arm exercises. Follow-up will be done every 6 months for 2 years. During follow-up, a comprehensive evaluation will be performed, including history and physical examinations, radiological and histopathological examinations, UEL index, ICG lymphography, and quality-of-life evaluation. Each subject will complete the Lymphedema Quality of Life Questionnaire.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
BCRL improvement rate
Time Frame: 24 months

BCRL definition:

Post-operation subject condition with the presence of minimum DB 2 with one or both symptoms (swelling, heaviness), and an increment of UEL index >10% compared to pre-operation OR Post-operation subject condition with presence of ≥ DB 2 with minimum area 30% in one arm region in one of the arm lymphatic pathways (anterior or posterior), without presence of symptoms (swelling or heaviness), and increment of UEL index >10% compared to pre-operation.

International Society of Lymphology (ISL) stage 1 definition:

An early stage of lymphedema is characterized by soft tissue swelling that may subside with limb elevation or overnight rest, without permanent structural changes.

BCRL improvement :

Improvement in ICG lymphography stage with or without clinical signs (UEL <10% and or symptoms improvement)
24 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Quality of life in lymphedema
Time Frame: 24 months
QLQ-BR23 is a supplement to the EORTC QLQ-30, specific to breast cancer patients, containing 23 questions and scored from 0 (not at all) to 4 (very much). To evaluate the quality of life, we asked three questions about the arm (pain, swelling, and mobility issues). The quality of life decreases with a higher score.
24 months
Adverse event of lymphedema
Time Frame: 24 months
Complications such as seroma, hematoma, wound separation, bleeding, and wound infection can be seen after surgery.
24 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Dharmais National Cancer Center Hospital

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Bayu Brahma, MD, PhD, Dharmais Cancer Hospital - National Cancer Center

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
March 18, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
March 21, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
March 21, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
November 14, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 14, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
November 18, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
November 18, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 14, 2025

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
November 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • DP.04.03/11.5/095/2024

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings