Influence of Two Different Occlusal Schemes Following Single Molar Implant-supported Restorations.
Influence of Two Different Occlusal Schemes on Radiographic and Clinical Outcomes Following Single Molar Implant-supported Restorations. A 2-years Randomized Controlled Trial.
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Cairo, Egypt
- International Dental Continuing Education
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients who have a single posterior (1st or second molar) bounded implant with opposing natural tooth teeth.
- Adults above the age of 18.
- Good oral hygiene.
- Patient accepts to provide informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Smokers.
- Pregnant and lactating females.
- Medically compromised patients.
- Patients with untreated active periodontal diseases.
- Patients with parafunctional habits.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Prevention
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Protective occlusion
According to the literature, Misch introduced the concept of implant-protective occlusion (IPO) (Misch and Bidez, 1994) based on basic prosthetic concepts, bone biomechanical principles and finite element analysis, which refers to an occlusal scheme designed for implant restoration, promoting the conditions for less biomechanical complications by reducing the stress to the implant interface and enhancing the longevity of the implant and prosthesis.
It mainly entails the elimination of premature occlusal contacts or interferences.
|
To evaluate crestal bone loss, chewing efficiency and prosthetic complications after single posterior implant restoration in protective occlusion in comparison to maximum intercuspation occlusion.
|
|
Experimental: Maximum Intercuspation
|
to evaluate crestal bone loss, chewing efficiency and prosthetic complications after single posterior implant restoration in protective occlusion in comparison to maximum intercuspation occlusion.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Marginal Bone Loss
Time Frame: 2 years
|
• To evaluate marginal bone loss using bitewing radiographs in mm.
|
2 years
|
|
Stability
Time Frame: 2 years
|
• to assess implant micromotion in both groups by resonance frequency analysis (Osstell®) in mm.
|
2 years
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- IDCE-16112025
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.