Brain Ultrafast Ultrasound Imaging (Brain Ultrafas)

December 9, 2025 updated by: University Hospital, Bordeaux

Brain Ultrafast Ultrasound Imaging: Application in Pediatric Cardiology: Brain Ultrafast

Congenital heart defects affect 1 in 100 births in France, with rising prevalence due to better care. Despite improved survival, 40% of children post-surgery face neurological impairments, and some of them show brain lesions. Causes include heart defects, genetic syndromes, and surgeries. Some heart defects and support systems increase cerebral risks. Monitoring cerebral perfusion is difficult to assess but emerging ultrafast ultrasound offers real-time, non-invasive blood flow insights.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Congenital heart defects affect 1 in 100 live births in France. While incidence remains stable, prevalence is rising due to improved medical care, with cases expected to double by 2050. Despite increased survival, neurological comorbidities remain a major concern, with 40% of patients undergoing childhood cardiac surgery experiencing impairments and 73% presenting MRI-detectable brain lesions postoperatively. These injuries result from congenital heart defects, haemodynamic disturbances, genetic syndromes, and neonatal surgeries with extracorporeal circulation.

Some heart defects, such as systemic-to-pulmonary shunts and cyanotic heart diseases, impair cerebral perfusion, increasing the risk of hypoxia and stroke. Mechanical circulatory support systems (e.g. ECMO, cardiopulmonary bypass) also contribute to cerebral risks due to hypoperfusion and clotting complications.

Cerebral autoregulation helps maintain stable perfusion despite blood pressure variations. However, bedside cerebral perfusion monitoring remains challenging leading to reliance on indirect methods like near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) and transcranial Doppler (TCD), both with limitations. Ultrafast ultrasound (UFUS) is an emerging non-invasive technique that enables real-time quantification of cerebral blood flow, offering new insights into neonatal cerebral haemodynamics.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
300

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Every patient, under two years old, receiving a transcranial Doppler in routine care in our CHD unit of intensive care and anaesthesiology for cardiovascular surgery department.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Every patient under 2 years old any sex or gender hospitalised in the congenital heart disease unit of the intensive care and anaesthesia for cardiovascular surgery, CHU de Bordeaux.
  • Open anterior fontanella
  • congenital heart disease
  • cardiac shock necessitating mechanical circulatory support.
  • Social security affiliation
  • Parental or legal guardian's non-opposition

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Anechoic
  • Allergy to echocardiography gel.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Patient receiving a transcranial Doppler
Every patient receiving a transcranial Doppler in routine care in our CHD unit of intensive care and anaesthesiology for cardiovascular surgery department
Other: Ultrafast ultrasound (UFUS)
Ultrafast ultrasound imaging(UFUS), ultrasound images at a very high rate, using a Verasonics system (ultrasound open platform).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Cerebral blood volume variation
Time Frame: at baseline
Depending on stage of medico-surgical treatment
at baseline
Cerebral blood volume variation
Time Frame: at baseline
Depending on hemodynamic or ventilatory situation, and exposure to vasoactive or neuroactive drugs.
at baseline

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Evolution of Arterial blood pressure
Time Frame: at baseline
at baseline
Evolution of central venous blood pressure
Time Frame: at baseline
at baseline
Evolution of left atrial pressure
Time Frame: at baseline
at baseline
Evolution of SpO2
Time Frame: at baseline
at baseline
Evolution of SaO2
Time Frame: at baseline
at baseline
Evolution of SvO2
Time Frame: at baseline
at baseline
Evolution of PaCO2
Time Frame: at baseline
at baseline
Evolution of PaO2
Time Frame: at baseline
at baseline
Evolution of Hemoglobinemia
Time Frame: at baseline
at baseline
Inotropic drugs dosages
Time Frame: at baseline
at baseline
Vasopressive drugs dosages
Time Frame: at baseline
at baseline
Sedation dosages
Time Frame: at baseline
at baseline
Analgesia dosages
Time Frame: at baseline
at baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University Hospital, Bordeaux

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
January 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
January 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
January 1, 2029

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
November 19, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 9, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
December 23, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
December 23, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 9, 2025

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
December 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • CHUBX 2025/28
  • CER-BDX 2025-136 (Other Identifier: Comité d'Etique - Centre Ethique et Recherche en Santé de Bordeaux)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings