Evaluation of the Efficiency of Bone Born Intra Oral Distractor for Closure of Wide Alveolar Cleft (BBID-WAC)
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Cairo Governorate
-
Cairo, Cairo Governorate, Egypt, 12345
- Faculty of oral and dental medicine for Girls AlAzhar University
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Child
- Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients with wide alveolar clefts more than 8ml either unilateral or bilateral or median facial cleft.
- Patients who had previous failed grafting also may be included.
- Age range of patients 7-20 years old, with no gender prediction, able to read and sign the informed consent (parents)
- Patients with median facial clefts.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Narrow alveolar cleft
- Syndromic patients.
- Oral soft tissues defects, inflammation, infections and bone metabolism disturbance.
- Allergy to titanium implant.
- Patient with systemic disease and immunocompromised patient.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Bone-Borne Intra-oral distractor
Surgeries to fix the device were conducted under GA.
Then latency period of seven days was applied.
Activation was 0.5 mm twice a day.
The transport segment touched the docking site then the Consolidation period is achieved.
Follow up for 6 months.
|
Evaluation of the efficiency of the Bone-Borne Intraoral distractors on wide Alveolar cleft
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in alveolar cleft defect area measured by cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) (minimum value: 0 mm²; no predefined maximum value; lower values indicate better outcome)
Time Frame: 6 months postoperative follow up
|
The alveolar cleft defect area will be quantitatively measured using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT).
Preoperative and postoperative CBCT scans will be superimposed to calculate the change in defect area following distraction osteogenesis.
|
6 months postoperative follow up
|
|
Change in tooth mobility assessed using Miller's Tooth Mobility Index (minimum score: 0; maximum score: 3; higher scores indicate worse mobility)
Time Frame: 6 months postoperative follow up
|
Tooth mobility will be clinically evaluated using Miller's Tooth Mobility Index to detect and grade the degree of mobility before and after treatment.
|
6 months postoperative follow up
|
|
Vitality of the transported bone segment assessed by clinical vitality indicators after transport distraction osteogenesis (binary outcome: viable / non-viable; viable outcome indicates better result)
Time Frame: 6 months follow up
|
Vitality of the transported disk after transport distraction osteogenesis is measured through clinical indicators as No infection, No pain or inflammation, Stable transported segment, Successful consolidation phase.
|
6 months follow up
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Study Chair: Hanaa Elmorsy, Assis.Lec, Assistant lecturer of OMFs department Azhar University
- Study Director: Susan H Abdel Hakim, professor, Professor of OMFs department azhar university
- Study Director: Wael Shawkat, Consultant, Head of the department at the Health Insurance Hospital
- Study Director: Fatema khalifa, Assist.Prof, Assistant Professor of OMFs Azhar university
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimated)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- ORSUR-10
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.