Comparison of ACT and CBSM for Caregivers in Cancer
Comparing the Effectiveness of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy and Cognitive Behavioral Stress Management on Fear of Recurrence, Quality of Life, Psychological Distress, and Fatigue of Caregivers of Cancer Patients
The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the effectiveness of cognitive-behavioral stress management (CBSM) and acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) on the fear of recurrence, quality of life, psychological distress, and fatigue of caregivers of cancer patients.
Researchers compare the effectiveness of CBSM and ACT to a Control(without receiving intervention) to see if treatment works to improve the health of caregivers of cancer patients. A comparison between the two treatments was also conducted to determine if there was a difference in their effectiveness.
Participants:
In this study, 66 participants were randomly assigned to one of three groups: the CBSM group, the ACT group, or the control group.
The CBSM and ACT groups each attended eight 90-minute, in-person sessions twice a week.
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Yazd Province
-
Yazd, Yazd Province, Iran
- Emdadgaran-e Ashura Charity Institute
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
To be included in the study, caregivers had to be 18 years or older, literate, and provide informed consent. A key requirement was that participants either lived with the patient or visited them at least twice a week.
Exclusion Criteria:
Exclusion criteria were applied to ensure the integrity of the study. Participants were excluded if they missed more than two sessions, were currently receiving other psychological interventions, had a major psychiatric or cognitive disorder that would prevent them from providing informed consent, or if the patient passed away.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Cognitive Behavioral Stress Management (CBSM)
Participants in this group receive Cognitive Behavioral Stress Management (CBSM)
|
consisted of eight in-person sessions, twice a week for 90 minutes each
|
|
Experimental: Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT)
Participants in this group receive Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT)
|
consisted of eight in-person sessions, twice a week for 90 minutes each
|
|
No Intervention: Control
The control group receives no intervention.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Fear of Cancer Recurrence Inventory-caregiver (FCRI-c)
Time Frame: assessments at three distinct time points: at baseline (pre-intervention), immediately following the four-week intervention period (post-test), and at a two-month follow-up.
|
This scale, developed by Lin et al., (2018), consists of 42 items measured on a 5-point Likert scale, encompassing seven subscales related to triggers, severity, psychological distress, functional impairment, insight, reassurance, and coping Strategy.
|
assessments at three distinct time points: at baseline (pre-intervention), immediately following the four-week intervention period (post-test), and at a two-month follow-up.
|
|
Depression Anxiety and Stress (DASS)
Time Frame: assessments at three distinct time points: at baseline (pre-intervention), immediately following the four-week intervention period (post-test), and at a two-month follow-up.
|
This scale, developed by Lovibond and Lovibond (1995), consists of 21 items measured on a 4-point Likert scale, encompassing three subscales for depression, anxiety, and stress.
|
assessments at three distinct time points: at baseline (pre-intervention), immediately following the four-week intervention period (post-test), and at a two-month follow-up.
|
|
Caregiver Quality of Life-Cancer (CQOLC)
Time Frame: assessments at three distinct time points: at baseline (pre-intervention), immediately following the four-week intervention period (post-test), and at a two-month follow-up.
|
This scale, developed by Weitzner et al., (1999), consists of 35 items measured on a 5-point Likert scale, encompassing four subscales for burden, disruptiveness, positive adaptation, and financial concern, along with eight additional items.
|
assessments at three distinct time points: at baseline (pre-intervention), immediately following the four-week intervention period (post-test), and at a two-month follow-up.
|
|
Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI)
Time Frame: assessments at three distinct time points: at baseline (pre-intervention), immediately following the four-week intervention period (post-test), and at a two-month follow-up.
|
This scale, developed by Smets et al., (1995), consists of 20 items measured on a 5-point Likert scale, encompassing five subscales: general fatigue, physical fatigue, reduced activity, reduced motivation, and mental fatigue.
|
assessments at three distinct time points: at baseline (pre-intervention), immediately following the four-week intervention period (post-test), and at a two-month follow-up.
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- IR.YAZD.REC.1403.058
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.