The Best Workflow for Paroxysmal Supraventricular Tachycardia Ablation With Zero-fluoroscopy (zeroPSVT)
Primary Objective: To observe, record, and analyze the workflow and guidance system efficiency of these two surgical procedures, including placement time, location, and the number of successful placements.
Secondary Objective: To compare the differences between the two procedures and observe and record the process of transitioning to intracardiac ultrasound guidance by experienced physicians performing both workflows. The primary focus is on the time spent on target steps and related complications, with the aim of reducing radiation exposure during the procedure with the new technology.
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Taipei, Taiwan, 100
- National Taiwan University Hospita
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients with documented PSVT on ECG. Twelve-lead is preferred. Single-lead is acceptable if recording quality is good enough for interpretation.
- Patients who are willing to sign the informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria:
- The patients had received PSVT ablation procedure before.
- Informed consent could not be obtained
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Protocol A (Fam DX+)
Create geometry FAM Mapping with DECANAV(Fam DX+)
|
Mapping with DECANAV
Other Names:
|
|
Active Comparator: Protocol B (FAM DX-)
Create geometry FAM MAPPING WITH NAVISTAR (FAM DX-)
|
Mapping with NAVISTAR
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
The success of ablation
Time Frame: 1Year
|
defined by elimination of accessory pathway and slow nodal pathway or modification of the slow nodal pathway with which a PSVT upto 3 reentrants would not be induced
|
1Year
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
The complication rates
Time Frame: 1Year
|
including the occurrence of AV block needing pacemaker, or pericardial effusion needing drainage, or use of fluoroscopy
|
1Year
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Collaborators
Collaborators
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 202401199RIPB
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.