Fluctuational Imaging for the Diagnosis of Hepatic Hemangioma: A Multicenter, Prospective Study

February 11, 2026 updated by: Yonsei University

[Background and Rationale] Hepatic hemangioma is the most common benign tumor of the liver, with a reported prevalence of up to 20% in the general population. On B-mode ultrasonography, a typical hemangioma appears as a well-defined hyperechoic lesion compared with the surrounding liver parenchyma. However, hyperechogenicity is observed in only approximately 70% of cases, while the remaining lesions may appear hypoechoic or mixed echogenic. Additional sonographic features such as posterior acoustic enhancement or an echogenic rim may aid diagnosis, but none are specific to hemangioma. Consequently, contrast-enhanced CT or MRI is commonly required for definitive diagnosis, even when a hemangioma is strongly suspected on conventional ultrasound.

In 2020, Kobayashi et al. (Ultrasound Med Biol 2021;47:941-946)reported a novel ultrasound finding termed the "fluttering sign," defined as continuous motion of tiny hyperechoic dots within a hemangioma during real-time scanning. Although the precise mechanism has not been experimentally validated, this phenomenon is presumed to reflect motion of acoustic scatterers, mainly red blood cells, induced by the ultrasound beam. The fluttering sign was observed in approximately 39% of hyperechoic hemangiomas and in up to 85% of hypoechoic or mixed-echoic hemangiomas, suggesting potential lesion specificity.

A major limitation of the fluttering sign is its subjectivity, as visual assessment during real-time ultrasound is highly operator-dependent. To address this limitation, Imamura et al. (Sci Rep 2022;12:4701) developed a computer-based algorithm named Fluctuational Imaging (FLI), which objectively quantifies fluttering motion. FLI demonstrated almost perfect agreement with visual assessment of the fluttering sign (Cohen's kappa = 0.95).

[Study Objectives] Although FLI is theoretically expected to be specific to hemangiomas, no study has systematically evaluated its behavior across a broad spectrum of non-hemangioma hepatic lesions. The primary objective of this study is to investigate whether the proportion of FLI-positive findings is significantly higher in hepatic hemangiomas than in non-hemangioma liver lesions.

[Risk-Benefit Assessment] FLI is based on conventional diagnostic ultrasound physics and does not impose additional risk to patients. If FLI enables confident diagnosis of hepatic hemangioma using ultrasound alone, it may reduce unnecessary contrast-enhanced CT or MRI examinations, thereby decreasing healthcare costs, radiation exposure, and contrast-related risks. Overall, the anticipated benefits outweigh potential risks.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Detailed Description

[Study Population and Sample Size] This is an exploratory, prospective, multicenter study. A predefined sample size is not required. With an estimated enrollment of approximately 100 cases per institution over one year and participation of four institutions, approximately 400 cases are expected.

[Eligibility Criteria] Eligible participants are adults aged 19 years or older with a focal hepatic lesion ≥1 cm that has been definitively diagnosed or is expected to be diagnosed within one month after FLI examination, and who provide informed consent. Patients unable to hold their breath for at least 5 seconds, those with inadequate B-mode image quality, lesions <1 cm on ultrasound, or without definitive diagnosis within one month are excluded.

[Reference Standard] The reference standard for lesion diagnosis was defined as follows: hepatic hemangiomas were confirmed by histopathology or by typical imaging features with size stability for at least two years; hepatocellular carcinoma was confirmed by histopathology or by the presence of an LR-5 lesion in patients with liver cirrhosis; all other hepatic lesions (including metastasis, cholangiocarcinoma, adenoma, focal nodular hyperplasia, and angiomyolipoma) required histopathological confirmation.

[Study Design and Statistical Analysis] After informed consent, FLI is performed on the target lesion. FLI maps are anonymized and independently reviewed by four readers, each classifying findings as positive or negative. The primary endpoint is comparison of FLI-positive proportions between hemangioma and non-hemangioma groups using chi-square or Fisher's exact tests. Interreader agreement will be evaluated using Fleiss' kappa. The secondary endpoint of this study is to explore how the diagnostic performance of FLI for hepatic hemangioma varies according to lesion echogenicity and lesion depth. Continuous variables will be analyzed using Student's t-test or Mann-Whitney U test, as appropriate. A p-value < 0.05 will be considered statistically significant.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
400

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.
  • Name: Seung-seob Kim, Professor
  • Phone Number: 82) 10-2600-0127
  • Email: k2s0127@yuhs.ac

Study Locations

  • South Korea
    • Seodaemun-gu
      • Seoul, Seodaemun-gu, South Korea, 03722
        • Recruiting
        • Severance hospital, Yonsei university college of medicine
        • Contact:
          • Seung-seob Kim, Professor
          • Phone Number: 82) 10-2600-0127
          • Email: k2s0127@yuhs.ac

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

This prospective, multicenter study will enroll adult patients (≥19 years) from four university-affiliated tertiary hospitals in South Korea who have focal hepatic lesions measuring 1 cm or larger on ultrasonography. Eligible participants must have a definitive diagnosis established by pathology or lesion-specific imaging reference standards, or be expected to receive a definitive diagnosis within one month after the FLI examination. The study population will include patients with hepatic hemangiomas as well as a broad spectrum of non-hemangioma hepatic lesions, including both benign and malignant tumors.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adults aged 19 years or older.
  • Presence of a focal hepatic lesion measuring 1 cm or larger on ultrasonography.
  • Lesion diagnosis established by pathology or lesion-specific imaging reference standards, or expected to be definitively established within 1 month after the FLI examination.
  • Ability and willingness to provide written informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Inability to maintain stable breath-holding for at least 5 seconds during ultrasonography.
  • Inadequate B-mode ultrasound image quality of the target lesion due to factors such as acoustic shadowing or severe beam attenuation.
  • Target lesion measuring less than 1 cm on ultrasonography.
  • Failure to establish a definitive diagnosis within 1 month after the FLI examination.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Hepatic hemangioma
Patients with focal hepatic lesions diagnosed as hepatic hemangioma based on predefined reference standards.
Non-hemangioma hepatic lesions
Patients with focal hepatic lesions diagnosed as non-hemangioma hepatic tumors, including benign and malignant lesions, based on predefined reference standards.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
FLI-positivity
Time Frame: Periprocedural
FLI is performed on the target liver lesion. The resulting FLI maps are anonymized and independently reviewed by four readers, each classifying the findings as positive or negative according to predefined criteria. An FLI finding is considered positive when a high-signal-intensity area is present within the target lesion relative to the surrounding liver parenchyma; otherwise, it is considered negative. For the final determination, a lesion is classified as FLI-positive when at least three of the four readers rate it as positive.
Periprocedural

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Echogenicity of liver lesion
Time Frame: Periprocedural
The echogenicity of the target liver lesion is assessed on ultrasonography and recorded as one of the following categories: hyperechoic, hypoechoic, or mixed.
Periprocedural
Depth of liver lesion
Time Frame: Periprocedural
The depth of the target liver lesion is assessed on ultrasonography by measuring the distance from the ultrasound probe to the lesion and is recorded in centimeters.
Periprocedural

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Yonsei University

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Seung-seob Kim, Professor, Severance hospital, Yonsei university college of medicine

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
January 2, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 31, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 31, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
February 2, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 11, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
February 18, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
February 18, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 11, 2026

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
February 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 1-2024-0043

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hemangioma

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings