Comparison of Intralesional Triamcinolone Acetonide Treatment With Intralesional Verapamil Hydrochloride in Keloids

February 12, 2026 updated by: Muhammad Aamir Latif

Comparison of the Outcome of Treatment of Intralesional Triamcinolone Acetonide With Intralesional Verapamil Hydrochloride in Patients Presenting With Keloid at Tertiary Care Hospital, Bahawalpur.

The paucity of local literature regarding the comparison of intralesional verapamil with intralesional triamcinolone acetonide led this study to be carried out with the objective of comparing the clinical effectiveness of intralesional triamcinolone acetonide and intralesional verapamil hydrochloride in patients with keloids.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Although the anti-inflammatory and scar-enhancing properties of corticosteroids on hypertrophic scars and keloids have been investigated and documented thoroughly. There are many different treatments for keloids nowadays; each method has its advantages and disadvantages, and the results also vary depending on each study. Moreover, local data to address this issue is also scarce. The findings of this study would not add to the existing stats, but comparing the outcomes of both the drugs would also guide clinicians towards better management of keloids by choosing the more appropriate treatment.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
60

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Pakistan
    • Punjab Province
      • Bahawalpur, Punjab Province, Pakistan, 63100
        • Bahawal Victoria Hospital/Quaid-e-Azam Medical College

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Either gender
  • Aged between 20 and 60 years
  • With keloids
  • Benign dermal growths
  • Scar length not exceeding 5 centimeters
  • Keloid duration of five years or less
  • A baseline Vancouver Scar Scale score of 5 or more

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnant or lactating women
  • A family history of keloids
  • Diagnosed with conditions such as acromegaly, diabetes mellitus, or congestive cardiac disease
  • a history of thyroidectomy
  • Current or recent use of isotretinoin or anabolic steroids, as determined by history, physical examination, blood glucose analysis, and electrocardiography

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Triamcinolone Group
Patients received intralesional triamcinolone acetonide (20 mg/mL) at a volume not exceeding 1.5 cc per session every three weeks, for a maximum of eight sessions or until complete scar flattening. Each injection session was preceded by 20 seconds of cryotherapy using cryospray applied at a distance of one centimeter from the lesion.
Drug: Triamcinolone Acetonide
Patients received intralesional triamcinolone acetonide (20 mg/ml) at a volume not exceeding 1.5 cc per session every three weeks, for a maximum of eight sessions or until complete scar flattening. Each injection session was preceded by 20 seconds of cryotherapy using cryospray applied at a distance of one centimeter from the lesion.
Experimental: Verapamil Group
Patients were managed with intralesional verapamil hydrochloride (2.5 mg/ml) at a volume not exceeding 1.5 cc per session every three weeks, for a maximum of eight sessions or until complete scar flattening. Each injection session was preceded by 20 seconds of cryotherapy using cryospray applied at a distance of one centimeter from the lesion.
Drug: Verapamil Hydrochloride
Patients were managed with intralesional verapamil hydrochloride (2.5 mg/ml) at a volume not exceeding 1.5 cc per session every three weeks, for a maximum of eight sessions or until complete scar flattening. Each injection session was preceded by 20 seconds of cryotherapy using cryospray applied at a distance of one centimeter from the lesion.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Scar assessment
Time Frame: 24 weeks
Using the Vancouver Scar Scale, height, vascularity, pliability, and pigmentation were assessed at baseline and compared with post-treatment measures at 24 weeks. A score closer to 0 was deemed as better vascularity (not red), low pigmentation, high pliability (soft), and low thickness.
24 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Muhammad Aamir Latif

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Bakhtawar, Bahawal Victoria Hospital/Quaid-e-Azam Medical College, Bahawalpur
  • Study Director: Salman Ashraf, FCPS, Bahawal Victoria Hospital/Quaid-e-Azam Medical College, Bahawalpur

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
January 1, 2025

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
June 30, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
June 30, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
February 12, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 12, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
February 19, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
February 19, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 12, 2026

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
February 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • Dr-Bakhtawar-BVH

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Data can be shared on a reasonable request.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings