Evaluation of Modified Le Fort I Osteotomy for Treating Cleft Lip and Palate Patients
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Phase 4
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Alexandria, Egypt, 21514
- Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University, Champollion St., Azarita, Alexandria, Egypt
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Child
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Presence of a maxillary skeletal deformity requiring correction
- Presence of an alveolar cleft deformity not previously treated at the mixed dentition stage.
- Patients having an alveolar cleft previously treated but a residual deformity is still present.
Exclusion criteria:
- Class 1 occlusion
- Dental malocclusion not associated with dentofacial deformities.
- Medical contraindication to general anesthesia
- Psychological instability
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: adults with Angle class III relation and persistent alveolar bone defect due to CL/P deformity
|
segmental Le Fort I (SLF-1) osteotomy technique for repair of facial deformities of cleft lip and palate patients, as regards to the stability and predictability and cleft-alveolar gap dimension changes
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Alveolar Gap Measurement
Time Frame: 6 months
|
CBCT DICOM images of the patient's scan were imported into 3D Slicer software (BWH, USA).
Volume rendering was calculated based on selection of region between the base of the nose superiorly, and edges of the alveolar cleft inferiorly, posteriorly, anteriorly, and on both sides.
Segmentation of air present in this region was done, and exported in Standard Tessellation Language (stl) file format.
The volume of this file was calculated to give an estimate of volume of the alveolar defect, using Meshmixer™ Version 3.5.474
(Autodesk®, California, USA).
6 months' postoperative CBCT and preoperative CBCT.
were compared to determine the amount of change.
|
6 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
amount of planned maxillary advancement compared to actual amount of advancement achieved after the operation
Time Frame: 6 month
|
Planned amount of advancement was extracted from the digital planning procedure for each subject, and this was compared with the actual amount of advancement achieved from the surgery.
This actual amount of advancement was calculated by superimposing the 3D-generated skulls of the preoperative CBCT on the 3D-generated skull of the postoperative CBCT, and a point placed on the upper first molar of each of the preoperative and postoperative CBCT.
The distance between the two points is the amount of advancemenet achieved.
|
6 month
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 0026-05/2019
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.