Road Mapping Guided Puncture Versus Ultrasound Guided Puncture During Retrograde Angioplasty Feasibility and Safety
The study aims to compare the technical feasibility and safety of road mapping-guided versus ultrasound-guided retrograde arterial puncture in patients with (CLTI) as measured by:
- Puncture success rate
- Access-related complication rate (e.g., hematoma, vessel dissection, perforation)
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Yohana F Fayez, MBBCh
- Phone Number: +201288374728
- Email: yohana_farouz_post@med.sohag.edu.eg
Study Locations
-
-
-
Sohag, Egypt, 82511
- Recruiting
- Sohag university hospital
-
Contact:
- Yohana Farouz Fayez, MBBCh
- Phone Number: +201288374728
- Email: yohana_farouz_post@med.sohag.edu.eg
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion criteria: -.
- Adults : Both male and female participants.
Diagnosed with critical limp threatening ischemia (CLTI):
significant occlusions in the femoropopliteal
o Rutherford Class 5: Non-healing wounds or ulcers
Failed or unable to achieve antegrade access:
Patients requiring retrograde puncture for the procedure.
- Planned intervention with retrograde access: Candidates for endovascular interventions, including angioplasty, stent deployment
Exclusion criteria:
• Active infection at the puncture site: Any localized infection, particularly over the ankle region , will be an exclusion.
• Severe calcification or anatomical abnormalities: Patients with excessive arterial calcification or significant anatomical distortion preventing safe retrograde puncture.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Road Mapping Guided Puncture
|
Road-map guided versus US guided retrograde access
|
|
Active Comparator: Ultrasound Guided Puncture
|
Road-map guided versus US guided retrograde access
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
|---|---|
|
Complication rate
Time Frame: 12 months
|
12 months
|
|
Success rate
Time Frame: 12 months
|
12 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- Soh-Med-26-1-1MS
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.