Effect of Central Venous Catheter Dressing Types on Device-Related Pressure Injuries (CVC PROTECT)
The Effect of Central Venous Catheter Dressing Types on Medical Device-Related Pressure Injuries in Intensive Care Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial
The purpose of this clinical trial is to evaluate the effect of different central venous catheter dressing methods on the development of medical device-related pressure injuries in participants treated in the intensive care unit.
This study aims to answer the following questions:
- What is the risk of pressure injury development in participants whose catheter dressings are performed using gauze and adhesive tape?
- What is the risk of pressure injury development in participants whose catheter dressings are performed using a chlorhexidine gluconate-containing transparent dressing?
- Is there a difference between these two dressing methods in terms of pressure injury development?
The researchers will compare participants receiving gauze and adhesive tape dressings with participants receiving chlorhexidine gluconate-containing transparent dressings.
Participants will:
- Receive catheter dressings according to the assigned dressing method based on randomization.
- Undergo regular catheter site assessments.
- Be evaluated for pressure injury development through skin assessments.
- Have their pressure injury risk monitored using the Braden Pressure Injury Risk Assessment Scale.
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
This study is a randomized controlled experimental study designed to evaluate the effects of different central venous catheter dressing methods on the development of medical device-related pressure injuries in participants treated in the intensive care unit.
The study was conducted in the intensive care unit of a tertiary-level hospital. Participants who underwent central venous catheterization and met the study protocol criteria were included.
Participants were assigned to two groups using a randomization method. The randomization process was performed to ensure balanced group distribution and to minimize potential bias.
In the first group, central venous catheter dressing was performed using gauze and adhesive tape. In the second group, dressing was performed using a chlorhexidine gluconate-containing transparent dressing.
Participants' catheter sites were systematically assessed at predetermined observation time points. During these assessments, skin integrity, skin surface characteristics, and clinical findings related to medical device-related pressure injury development were evaluated.
Catheter site evaluations were recorded using a structured observation form. Moisture at the catheter site and skin surface characteristics were assessed during routine follow-up.
Participants' pressure injury risk levels were evaluated using the Braden Pressure Injury Risk Assessment Scale.
Throughout the study, central venous catheter care and dressing procedures were performed in accordance with clinical protocols.
Data obtained during the study were analyzed using appropriate statistical methods.
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Istanbul
-
Istanbul, Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye), 34384
- Prof. Dr. Cemil Taşcıoğlu City Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria: Patients hospitalized in the intensive care unit who:
- Were aged 18 years or older,
- Underwent a new central venous catheter insertion,
- Had no pressure injury at the catheter insertion site at baseline,
- Provided informed consent (patient or legal representative).
Exclusion Criteria: Patients who:
- Had a pressure injury at the catheter insertion site at baseline,
- Had dermatological conditions affecting skin integrity at the catheter site,
- Had a central venous catheter inserted at another institution,
- Were discharged or deceased before completion of follow-up.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Prevention
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Gauze and Adhesive Tape
Participants received central venous catheter dressing using gauze and adhesive tape according to institutional protocol.
|
Central venous catheter dressing performed using sterile gauze and adhesive tape.
|
|
Experimental: Chlorhexidine Gluconate Transparent Dressing
Participants received central venous catheter dressing using chlorhexidine gluconate-impregnated transparent dressing according to institutional protocol.
|
Central venous catheter dressing performed using chlorhexidine gluconate-impregnated transparent dressing.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Medical device-related pressure injury at central venous catheter site.
Time Frame: Day 2, Day 9, and Day 16
|
Incidence of Stage 1 medical device-related pressure injury at the central venous catheter insertion site, assessed according to the National Pressure Injury Advisory Panel (NPIAP) Staging System (Stage 1 represents non-blanchable erythema of intact skin; higher stages indicate greater tissue damage).
|
Day 2, Day 9, and Day 16
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Moisture at central venous catheter site
Time Frame: Day 2, Day 9, and Day 16
|
Assessment of moisture status at the central venous catheter insertion site during dressing changes.
|
Day 2, Day 9, and Day 16
|
|
Pressure injury risk (Braden Scale)
Time Frame: Day 1, Day 2, Day 9, and Day 16
|
Pressure injury risk assessed using the Braden Scale for Predicting Pressure Sore Risk (total score range: 6-23; lower scores indicate higher risk of pressure injury).
|
Day 1, Day 2, Day 9, and Day 16
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Hilal Uysal, PhD, Bartın University, Department of Internal Medicine Nursing
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- E-74555795-050.01.04-391967
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.