Trial to Test the Effectiveness of Vibrotactile Stimulation for Lower Limb Spasticity
Vibrotactile Stimulation for Lower Limb Spasticity
The goal of this clinical trial is to find out if Vibrotactile Stimulation (VTS) can help improve mobility and reduce spasticity (muscle stiffness) in people with lower limb spasticity. The study will also look at how VTS affects walking speed. The main questions it aims to answer are:
- Which areas of the body are the best for applying VTS?
- Does VTS help improve walking speed in people with lower limb spasticity?
Participants will:
- Receive 15 minutes of VTS treatment on different parts of the body
- Use the VTS device for 60 minutes during supervised lab sessions and at home (at rest and while walking)
- Complete a daily log of how much time the device was used for and note any issues or difficulties the participant experience
- Complete assessments after the treatment to measure change in mobility
- Complete surveys about how comfortable the device is to use
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
This study will investigate both the neurophysiological mechanisms and clinical effects of VTS in individuals with poststroke lower limb spasticity.
Aim 1 will assess how different anatomical placements of VTS impact neuromuscular activity and spasticity.
Aim 2 will test the feasibility and efficacy of VTS during both static and dynamic gait contexts using a randomized crossover design.
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
New York
-
New York, New York, United States, 10065
- Recruiting
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine
-
Contact:
- Joan Stilling, MD., MS.
- Phone Number: 212-746-1500
- Email: qsi9001@med.cornell.edu
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- ≥6 months following neurologic diagnosis leading to spasticity
- Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) score of 3 or lower on ankle plantar flexor.
- Ability to stand (with or without assistance) and lie supine.
- Able to understand and comply with study procedures.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Uncontrolled systemic illness or serious medical conditions that could interfere with study procedures.
- Previous surgery to treat spasticity in the affected lower limb.
- Prior Botulinum Toxin (BoNT) therapy in the target limb within 4 months.
- Unstable medication regimens for spasmolysis or muscle relaxation.
- Participation in tone-related treatments (e.g., physiotherapy, TENS, acupuncture) within 4 weeks prior to baseline. If ongoing treatment started more than 4 weeks before baseline, it should remain consistent throughout the study
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
- Masking: Single
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: VTS Static Use, then Dynamic Use (Aim 2)
The participant will first use the VTS device for 60 minutes daily for three consecutive days while in a static position.
After a washout period of 1 week, the participant will use the VTS device for 60 minutes daily for three consecutive days during active gait training.
|
The Vibrotactile Stimulation (VTS) device is a wearable, non-invasive therapeutic system designed to reduce spasticity and improve motor function in individuals with neurological impairments leading to lower limb spasticity. The device consists of a compact vibratory motor housed in a soft, adjustable strap that can be worn over targeted muscle groups (e.g., gastrocnemius/soleus complex). The stimulation is delivered at a predefined frequency and amplitude, optimized based on prior research to modulate spinal reflex pathways and reduce motoneuron hyperexcitability. The device will be worn during static conditions (e.g., standing or seated) and is intended for daily use at home or in-clinic. |
|
Experimental: VTS Dynamic Use, then Static Use (Aim 2)
The participant will first use the VTS device for 60 minutes daily for three consecutive days during active gait training.
After a washout period of 1 week, the participant will use the VTS device for 60 minutes daily for three consecutive days while in a static position.
|
The Vibrotactile Stimulation (VTS) device is a wearable, non-invasive therapeutic system designed to reduce spasticity and improve motor function in individuals with neurological impairments leading to lower limb spasticity. The device consists of a compact vibratory motor housed in a soft, adjustable strap that can be worn over targeted muscle groups (e.g., gastrocnemius/soleus complex). The stimulation is delivered at a predefined frequency and amplitude, optimized based on prior research to modulate spinal reflex pathways and reduce motoneuron hyperexcitability. The device will be used in dynamic conditions (e.g., walking) and is intended for daily use at home or in-clinic. |
|
Other: VTS Neurophysiological Mechanism (Aim 1)
The participant will use the VTS device for three 15-minutes sessions, once for each anatomical locations (i.e.
muscle belly, origin, and insertion) around the leg and ankle.
|
The Vibrotactile Stimulation (VTS) device is a wearable, non-invasive therapeutic system designed to reduce spasticity and improve motor function in individuals with neurological impairments leading to lower limb spasticity.
The device consists of a compact vibratory motor housed in a soft, adjustable strap that can be worn over targeted muscle groups (e.g., gastrocnemius/soleus complex).
The stimulation is delivered at a predefined frequency and amplitude, optimized based on prior research to modulate spinal reflex pathways and reduce motoneuron hyperexcitability.
The device will be used to investigate the neurophysiological mechanisms through which VTS modulates spasticity at different anatomical sites and its effectiveness on improving mobility.
investigate the underlying neurophysiological mechanisms through which VTS modulates spasticity and muscle tone at different anatomical locations (i.e.
muscle belly, origin, and insertion) around the leg and ankle.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
H-reflex amplitude Baseline (Aim 1)
Time Frame: Baseline measurement immediately before three 15-minutes intervention periods within a single session (Day 1) for Aim 1
|
Assesses spinal reflex excitability as a neurophysiological indicator of spasticity modulation.
μV amplitude; no fixed range.
|
Baseline measurement immediately before three 15-minutes intervention periods within a single session (Day 1) for Aim 1
|
|
H-reflex amplitude After Intervention (Aim 1)
Time Frame: Immediately after each of three 15-minutes intervention periods within a single session (Day 1) for Aim 1
|
Assesses spinal reflex excitability as a neurophysiological indicator of spasticity modulation.
μV amplitude; no fixed range.
|
Immediately after each of three 15-minutes intervention periods within a single session (Day 1) for Aim 1
|
|
Surface EMG activity of gastrocnemius/soleus Baseline (Aim 1)
Time Frame: Baseline measurement immediately before three 15-minutes intervention periods within a single session (Day 1) for Aim 1
|
Measures muscle activation patterns in gastrocnemius/soleus to evaluate VTS effects.
μV amplitude; no fixed range.
|
Baseline measurement immediately before three 15-minutes intervention periods within a single session (Day 1) for Aim 1
|
|
Surface EMG activity of gastrocnemius/soleus After Intervention (Aim 1)
Time Frame: Immediately after each of three 15-minutes intervention periods within a single session (Day 1) for Aim 1
|
Measures muscle activation patterns in gastrocnemius/soleus to evaluate VTS effects.
μV amplitude; no fixed range.
|
Immediately after each of three 15-minutes intervention periods within a single session (Day 1) for Aim 1
|
|
Modified Ashworth Scale at Screening
Time Frame: Screening Visit (-0 to 7 days prior to Aim 1 intervention)
|
Assesses muscle tone and spasticity, especially in ankle plantarflexors.Total score ranges from: 0 (no increase in tone) to 4 (rigid in flexion/extension).
|
Screening Visit (-0 to 7 days prior to Aim 1 intervention)
|
|
Modified Ashworth Scale at Baseline (Aim 1)
Time Frame: Baseline measurement immediately before three 15-minutes intervention periods within a single session (Day 1) for Aim 1
|
Assesses muscle tone and spasticity, especially in ankle plantarflexors.Total score ranges from: 0 (no increase in tone) to 4 (rigid in flexion/extension).
|
Baseline measurement immediately before three 15-minutes intervention periods within a single session (Day 1) for Aim 1
|
|
Modified Ashworth Scale After Intervention (Aim 1)
Time Frame: Immediately after each of three 15-minutes intervention periods within a single session (Day 1) for Aim 1
|
Assesses muscle tone and spasticity, especially in ankle plantarflexors.Total score ranges from: 0 (no increase in tone) to 4 (rigid in flexion/extension).
|
Immediately after each of three 15-minutes intervention periods within a single session (Day 1) for Aim 1
|
|
Modified Ashworth Scale at Baseline (Aim 2)
Time Frame: Baseline measurement immediately before intervention for 3 consecutive days for Aim 2
|
Assesses muscle tone and spasticity, especially in ankle plantarflexors.Total score ranges from: 0 (no increase in tone) to 4 (rigid in flexion/extension).
|
Baseline measurement immediately before intervention for 3 consecutive days for Aim 2
|
|
Modified Ashworth Scale After Intervention (Aim 2)
Time Frame: Immediately after intervention for 3 consecutive days for Aim 2
|
Assesses muscle tone and spasticity, especially in ankle plantarflexors.Total score ranges from: 0 (no increase in tone) to 4 (rigid in flexion/extension).
|
Immediately after intervention for 3 consecutive days for Aim 2
|
|
Passive range of motion at the ankle at Screening
Time Frame: Screening Visit (-0 to 7 days prior to Aim 1 intervention)
|
Evaluates joint flexibility, particularly at the ankle.
Range:Degrees; higher indicates greater flexibility
|
Screening Visit (-0 to 7 days prior to Aim 1 intervention)
|
|
Passive range of motion at the ankle at Baseline (Aim 1)
Time Frame: Baseline measurement immediately before three 15-minutes intervention periods within a single session (Day 1) for Aim 1
|
Evaluates joint flexibility, particularly at the ankle.
Range:Degrees; higher indicates greater flexibility
|
Baseline measurement immediately before three 15-minutes intervention periods within a single session (Day 1) for Aim 1
|
|
Passive range of motion at the ankle After Intervention (Aim 1)
Time Frame: Immediately after each of three 15-minutes intervention periods within a single session (Day 1) for Aim 1
|
Evaluates joint flexibility, particularly at the ankle.
Range:Degrees; higher indicates greater flexibility
|
Immediately after each of three 15-minutes intervention periods within a single session (Day 1) for Aim 1
|
|
Passive range of motion at the ankle at Baseline (Aim 2)
Time Frame: Baseline measurement immediately before intervention for 3 consecutive days for Aim 2
|
Evaluates joint flexibility, particularly at the ankle.
Range:Degrees; higher indicates greater flexibility
|
Baseline measurement immediately before intervention for 3 consecutive days for Aim 2
|
|
Passive range of motion at the ankle After Intervention (Aim 2)
Time Frame: Immediately after intervention for 3 consecutive days for Aim 2
|
Evaluates joint flexibility, particularly at the ankle.
Range:Degrees; higher indicates greater flexibility
|
Immediately after intervention for 3 consecutive days for Aim 2
|
|
10 meter walk test at Baseline (Aim 2)
Time Frame: Baseline measurement immediately before intervention for 3 consecutive days for Aim 2
|
Measures gait speed over a short distance; primary measure of functional mobility.
Time is in seconds; lower is better.
|
Baseline measurement immediately before intervention for 3 consecutive days for Aim 2
|
|
10 meter walk test at Baseline After Intervention (Aim 2)
Time Frame: Immediately after intervention for 3 consecutive days for Aim 2
|
Measures gait speed over a short distance; primary measure of functional mobility.
Time is in seconds; lower is better.
|
Immediately after intervention for 3 consecutive days for Aim 2
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Timed up and go (TUG) at Baseline (Aim 2)
Time Frame: Baseline measurement immediately before intervention for 3 consecutive days for Aim 2
|
Assesses walking endurance and functional mobility over a longer duration.Distance in meters; higher is better.
|
Baseline measurement immediately before intervention for 3 consecutive days for Aim 2
|
|
Timed up and go (TUG) After Intervention (Aim 2)
Time Frame: Immediately after intervention for 3 consecutive days for Aim 2
|
Assesses walking endurance and functional mobility over a longer duration.Distance in meters; higher is better.
|
Immediately after intervention for 3 consecutive days for Aim 2
|
|
Two minute walk test (TMWT) at Baseline (Aim 2)
Time Frame: Baseline measurement immediately before intervention for 3 consecutive days for Aim 2
|
Assesses functional mobility, balance, and fall risk.
Time (s); lower is better.
|
Baseline measurement immediately before intervention for 3 consecutive days for Aim 2
|
|
Two minute walk test (TMWT) After Intervention (Aim 2)
Time Frame: Immediately after intervention for 3 consecutive days for Aim 2
|
Assesses functional mobility, balance, and fall risk.
Time (s); lower is better.
|
Immediately after intervention for 3 consecutive days for Aim 2
|
|
Berg Balance Scale (BBS) at Baseline (Aim 2)
Time Frame: Baseline measurement immediately before intervention for 3 consecutive days for Aim 2
|
Evaluates balance performance using a 14-item scale.
Range: 0 to 56; higher scores indicate better balance.
|
Baseline measurement immediately before intervention for 3 consecutive days for Aim 2
|
|
Berg Balance Scale (BBS) After Intervention (Aim 2)
Time Frame: Immediately after intervention for 3 consecutive days for Aim 2
|
Evaluates balance performance using a 14-item scale.
Range: 0 to 56; higher scores indicate better balance.
|
Immediately after intervention for 3 consecutive days for Aim 2
|
|
Global Impression of Change Scale (GICS) at Baseline (Aim 2)
Time Frame: Baseline measurement immediately before intervention for 3 consecutive days for Aim 2
|
Self-reported measure of overall perceived improvement.
Range: 1 (very much worse) to 7 (very much improved.
|
Baseline measurement immediately before intervention for 3 consecutive days for Aim 2
|
|
Global Impression of Change Scale (GICS) After Intervention (Aim 2)
Time Frame: Immediately after intervention for 3 consecutive days for Aim 2
|
Self-reported measure of overall perceived improvement.
Range: 1 (very much worse) to 7 (very much improved.
|
Immediately after intervention for 3 consecutive days for Aim 2
|
|
Short form 12 (SF12) at Baseline (Aim 2)
Time Frame: Baseline measurement immediately before intervention for 3 consecutive days for Aim 2
|
Assesses health-related quality of life across physical and mental domains.
Range: 0 to 100 per domain; higher is better
|
Baseline measurement immediately before intervention for 3 consecutive days for Aim 2
|
|
Short form 12 (SF12) After Intervention (Aim 2)
Time Frame: Immediately after intervention for 3 consecutive days for Aim 2
|
Assesses health-related quality of life across physical and mental domains.
Range: 0 to 100 per domain; higher is better
|
Immediately after intervention for 3 consecutive days for Aim 2
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Collaborators
Collaborators
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Joan Stilling, M.D., M.S., Weill Medical College of Cornell University
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Khalifeloo M, Naghdi S, Ansari NN, Akbari M, Jalaie S, Jannat D, Hasson S. A study on the immediate effects of plantar vibration on balance dysfunction in patients with stroke. J Exerc Rehabil. 2018 Apr 26;14(2):259-266. doi: 10.12965/jer.1836044.022. eCollection 2018 Apr.
- Caliandro P, Celletti C, Padua L, Minciotti I, Russo G, Granata G, La Torre G, Granieri E, Camerota F. Focal muscle vibration in the treatment of upper limb spasticity: a pilot randomized controlled trial in patients with chronic stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012 Sep;93(9):1656-61. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2012.04.002. Epub 2012 Apr 13.
- Seo NJ, Woodbury ML, Bonilha L, Ramakrishnan V, Kautz SA, Downey RJ, Dellenbach BHS, Lauer AW, Roark CM, Landers LE, Phillips SK, Vatinno AA. TheraBracelet Stimulation During Task-Practice Therapy to Improve Upper Extremity Function After Stroke: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Study. Phys Ther. 2019 Mar 1;99(3):319-328. doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzy143.
- Seim CE, Wolf SL, Starner TE. Wearable vibrotactile stimulation for upper extremity rehabilitation in chronic stroke: clinical feasibility trial using the VTS Glove. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2021 Jan 23;18(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s12984-021-00813-7.
- Seim CE, Ritter B, Starner TE, Flavin K, Lansberg MG, Okamura AM. Design of a Wearable Vibrotactile Stimulation Device for Individuals With Upper-Limb Hemiparesis and Spasticity. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2022;30:1277-1287. doi: 10.1109/TNSRE.2022.3174808. Epub 2022 May 17.
- Kodama K, Yasuda K, Kuznetsov NA, Hayashi Y, Iwata H. Balance Training With a Vibrotactile Biofeedback System Affects the Dynamical Structure of the Center of Pressure Trajectories in Chronic Stroke Patients. Front Hum Neurosci. 2019 Mar 12;13:84. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2019.00084. eCollection 2019.
- Enders LR, Hur P, Johnson MJ, Seo NJ. Remote vibrotactile noise improves light touch sensation in stroke survivors' fingertips via stochastic resonance. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2013 Oct 11;10:105. doi: 10.1186/1743-0003-10-105.
- Bark K, Hyman E, Tan F, Cha E, Jax SA, Buxbaum LJ, Kuchenbecker KJ. Effects of vibrotactile feedback on human learning of arm motions. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2015 Jan;23(1):51-63. doi: 10.1109/TNSRE.2014.2327229. Epub 2014 Jun 2.
- Alashram, A. and Annino, G. (2022). Focal muscle vibration reduces spasticity and improves functional level in incomplete spinal cord injury: a case report. Physikalische Medizin Rehabilitationsmedizin Kurortmedizin, 33(03), 162-165. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1819-6874
- Afzal MR, Pyo S, Oh MK, Park YS, Yoon J. Evaluating the effects of delivering integrated kinesthetic and tactile cues to individuals with unilateral hemiparetic stroke during overground walking. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2018 Apr 16;15(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s12984-018-0372-0.
- Fari G, Ranieri M, Marvulli R, Dell'Anna L, Fai A, Tognolo L, Bernetti A, Caforio L, Megna M, Losavio E. Is There a New Road to Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation? A Case Report about the Effects of Driving a Go-Kart on Muscle Spasticity. Diseases. 2023 Aug 22;11(3):107. doi: 10.3390/diseases11030107.
- Afzal MR, Lee H, Eizad A, Lee CH, Oh MK, Yoon J. Effects of Vibrotactile Biofeedback Coding Schemes on Gait Symmetry Training of Individuals With Stroke. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2019 Aug;27(8):1617-1625. doi: 10.1109/TNSRE.2019.2924682. Epub 2019 Jun 24.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Neurologic Manifestations
- Musculoskeletal Diseases
- Cerebrovascular Disorders
- Brain Diseases
- Central Nervous System Diseases
- Nervous System Diseases
- Vascular Diseases
- Cardiovascular Diseases
- Muscular Diseases
- Muscle Hypertonia
- Neuromuscular Manifestations
- Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms
- Signs and Symptoms
- Muscle Spasticity
- Stroke
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 25-07029051
- UL1TR002384 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
IPD Sharing Time Frame
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type
- STUDY_PROTOCOL
- ICF
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Lower Limb Spasticity
-
NCT03017729Completed
-
NCT01905683CompletedLower Limb and Combined Lower Limb and Upper Limb Spasticity Due to Cerebral Palsy
-
NCT04050527Completed
-
NCT02020980Completed
-
NCT04604379CompletedUpper and/or Lower Limb Focal Spasticity
-
NCT03992404Active, not recruitingLower Limb or Combined Lower Limb and Upper Limb Spasticity Due to Stroke or Traumatic Brain Injury
-
NCT01603459CompletedSpasticity of the Upper and Lower Limb Due to Cerebral Causes
-
NCT07478822Recruiting
-
NCT07242300Not yet recruiting
-
NCT07292025CompletedUpper Limb Spasticity Post-Stroke
Clinical Trials on Vibrotactile Stimulation (Static Use)
-
NCT05152836CompletedParkinson Disease | Tremor
-
NCT03298243RecruitingStroke | Proprioceptive Disorders
-
NCT04069572SuspendedLow Back Pain | Chronic Pain | Migraine | Pelvic Pain | Functional Abdominal Pain Syndrome
-
NCT03785535Completed
-
NCT03255616Completed
-
NCT07443891Recruiting