Evaluation of Accuracy of 3D Printed Aligners in Comparison to Thermoformed Aligners in Orthodontic Patients (Aligner)
Assessment of the Accuracy of Tooth Movement of 3D Printed Versus Thermoformed Aligners in Patients With Lower Anterior Crowding: A Randomized Clinical Trial
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Recently, a new resin for 3D direct printed aligners (DPA) has been introduced. This resin, characterized by its viscoelastic properties, allows for precise control over material dimensions, structure, and properties. This enables the aligners to exert constant and gradual forces within the physiological limits of tooth movements .
Tera Harz Tc-58, a new direct-printed resin material introduced by Graphy Company, exhibits a significant shape memory effect. Approximately 90% of the deformation is recovered within 10 minutes, while 96% recovered after 60 minutes, whereas PETG maintains its deformed shape and shows no shape recovery.
DPA shows a significant enhancement in treating different moderate malocclusion cases by reducing the peer assessment rating (PAR) score by 86% and also reducing the need for attachment which simplifies treatment.
This study aims to determine the accuracy of DPA in facilitating tooth movement and to identify which types of tooth movements are more accurately achieved with DPA compared to conventional aligners.
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Cairo Governorate
-
Cairo, Cairo Governorate, Egypt, 12613
- Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine
-
Contact:
- Farouk Khaled Ismail, Postgraduate
- Phone Number: 00201002487056
- Email: farouk.khaled@dentistry.cu.edu.eg
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Child
- Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Non-extraction orthodontic treatment cases
- Mild to moderate lower anterior crowding (<5 mm)
- Age between 12 and 25 years
- Dental rotation less than 30 degrees
- Relapse cases with crowding less than 5 mm
Exclusion Criteria:
- Active or history of periodontal disease
- Presence of systemic disease
- Temporomandibular joint disorders (TMJ)
- Missing teeth
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: 3D printed aligner
Participants will receive orthodontic treatment using directly 3D printed aligners fabricated with shape memory resin.
|
direct printed aligner will be used
|
|
Active Comparator: thermoformed aligner
Participants will receive orthodontic treatment using conventional thermoformed aligners fabricated using vacuum forming techniques.
|
conventional thermoformed aligner will be the gold standard
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
accuracy of tooth movement
Time Frame: 6 month
|
The accuracy of tooth movement will be assessed by comparing the predicted tooth position from the digital treatment plan (TP) with the actual post-treatment position (T1) using 3D superimposition techniques.
Measurements will include linear and angular differences for each tooth using digital software analysis.
|
6 month
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Patient reported Pain
Time Frame: 6 month
|
Pain levels will be evaluated using a Visual Analogue Scale questionnaire completed by participants during aligner therapy. its score from 1 to 10 in which score 10 is the worst pain level |
6 month
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Migliorati M et al. Accuracy of orthodontic movements with 3D printed aligners: A prospective observational pilot study. Korean J Orthod. 2024;54(3):160-170.
- Rossini G, Parrini S, Castroflorio T, Deregibus A, Debernardi CL. Efficacy of clear aligners in controlling orthodontic tooth movement: A systematic review. Angle Orthod. 2015;85(5):881-889.
- Kesling HD. The philosophy of tooth positioning appliance. Am J Orthod Oral Surg. 1945;31:297-304.
Helpful Links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Estimated)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 30-12-2025
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.