Assessment of Maxillary Local Anesthesia Infiltration Using Needle-free Jet vs Conventional Syringe in Tooth Extraction
Assessment of Maxillary Local Anesthesia Infiltration Efficiency and Adult Patient Satisfaction: Needle-free Jet vs Conventional Syringe in Simple Tooth Extraction in a Single-blinded, Randomized Controlled Trial
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
- King Abdulaziz University
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- KAUDH patients aged 18 to 65 years.
- Bilateral posterior dentition suitable for the split-mouth technique.
- Classified as American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) I or ASA II.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Pediatric patients (<18 years).
- Medically compromised individuals.
- Patients with unilateral teeth indicated for extraction,
- Patient with upper anterior teeth requiring a nasopalatine nerve block.
- Patient with lower teeth requiring a nerve block.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Device Feasibility
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
- Masking: Quadruple
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Standard needle injection dental syringe
|
Conventional dental syringe injection
|
|
Active Comparator: Needle free injector
|
Dental needle-free anesthesia jet (Comfort-in™)
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Pain perception survey
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of assessment of treatment at 24 weeks
|
Pain levels were recorded using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) in a survey after the extraction procedures.
VAS scores were measured by asking patients to mark their pain level on a 1-10 line, and these pain scores were summarized using means and standard deviations (SD), and medians with interquartile ranges (IQR).
( 1 low pain, 10 worst pain)
|
From enrollment to the end of assessment of treatment at 24 weeks
|
|
Pain perception survey
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of assessment of treatment at 24 weeks
|
Pain levels were recorded using the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) in a survey after the extraction procedures.
NRS scores were recorded verbally by the patient on a scale from 0 to 10, and these pain scores were summarized using means and standard deviations (SD), and medians with interquartile ranges (IQR).
( 0 is low pain, 10 worst pain)
|
From enrollment to the end of assessment of treatment at 24 weeks
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Alsbrooks K, Hoerauf K. Prevalence, causes, impacts, and management of needle phobia: An international survey of a general adult population. PloS one 2022; 17:e0276814.
- Kuzin AV. [Practical advices in choosing local anesthesia tools in dentistry. Management of carpule's quality in local anesthesia in dentistry]. Stomatologiia 2014; 93:37-39.
- Ravi AD, Sadhna D, Nagpaal D, Chawla L. Needle free injection technology: A complete insight. International journal of pharmaceutical investigation 2015; 5:192-199.
- Queralt CB, Comet V, Jr., Cruz JM, Val-Carreres C. Local anesthesia by jet-injection device in minor dermatologic surgery. Dermatologic surgery : official publication for American Society for Dermatologic Surgery [et al] 1995; 21:649-651.
- Munshi AK, Hegde A, Bashir N. Clinical evaluation of the efficacy of anesthesia and patient preference using the needle-less jet syringe in pediatric dental practice. J Clin Pediatr Dent 2001; 25:131-136.
- Makade CS, Shenoi PR, Gunwal MK. Comparison of acceptance, preference and efficacy between pressure anesthesia and classical needle infiltration anesthesia for dental restorative procedures in adult patients. Journal of conservative dentistry : JCD 2014; 17:169-174.
- Belevcikli M, Altan H, Demir O. Effect of the new needle-free injection system on pain perception and dental anxiety during anesthesia: randomized controlled split-mouth study. J Dent Anesth Pain Med. 2023 Feb;23(1):1-8. doi: 10.17245/jdapm.2023.23.1.1. Epub 2023 Jan 30.
- Altan A, Altan H, Almas B, Şahin ND. The effectiveness of a needle-free system in reducing injection pain during palatal infiltrative anesthesia in children: a randomized clinical study. J Clin Pediatr Dent 2025; 1:11.
- Brunton PA, McLean M, Vedagiri S, McKeage J, Ruddy B, Weatherly K, White D, Taberner A, Loch C. Jet injection needle-free dental anaesthesia: Initial findings. J Dent. 2022 Jul;122:104165. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2022.104165. Epub 2022 May 14.
- Shankar P, Chellathurai BNK, Kumar SA, et al. A Comparison in Patient Comfort Using Conventional Syringe and Needleless Jet Anesthesia Technique in Periodontal Surgery-A Split-Mouth Randomized Clinical Trial. Med 2022; 58:278.
- Sağlam H, Karataş E. Anesthetic Efficacy, Injection Pain and Pulse-rate Effect of Needle-free Injection in Pulpal Anesthesia of Maxillary Premolars with Irreversible Pulpitis: Randomised Clinical Study. European endodontic journal 2025; 10:181-187.
- Trimzi MA, Ham YB. A Needle-Free Jet Injection System for Controlled Release and Repeated Biopharmaceutical Delivery. Pharmaceutics 2021; 13.
- Eren F, Peker MS, Bekiroglu GN, Ozgur EG, Kargul B. The effect of a needle-free injection system on dental injection pain in children: a randomised cross-over clinical trial. J Clin Pediat Dentistry 2025; 49:128-139.
- Alameeri AA, AlShamsi HA, Murad A, Alhammadi MM, Alketbi MH, AlHamwi A, Rawi NHA, Kawas SA, Mohammed MM, Shetty SR. The feasibility of needleless jet injection versus conventional needle local anesthesia during dental procedures: a systematic review. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2022 Dec 31;48(6):331-341. doi: 10.5125/jkaoms.2022.48.6.331.
- Kumal M, Shah A, Karn K, Kandel K, Paneru A, Subedi K. Prevalence of dental anxiety and its associated factors among patients visiting tertiary care dental hospital in Kathmandu, Nepal: a cross-sectional study. BMJ Open. 2025 Aug 1;15(7):e103762. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-103762.
- Glaesmer H, Geupel H, Haak R. A controlled trial on the effect of hypnosis on dental anxiety in tooth removal patients. Patient education and counseling 2015; 98:1112-1115.
- Milgrom P. Increasing dental patients' access to measures for anxiety, fear, and phobia management. Perspectives from a dental school-based fear clinic. Anesthesia progress 1986; 33:62-64.
- Meechan JG. Infiltration Anesthesia in the Mandible. Dental Clin 2010; 54:621-629.
- Khan MIU, Singh RP, Prince J, Chiu AV, El-Awour H. Recent advances in dental local anaesthesia. Adv Oral Maxillofacial Surg 2025; 19:100575.
- Shareef RA, Chaturvedi S, Suleman G, Elmahdi AE, Elagib MFA. Analysis of tooth extraction causes and patterns. Open Access Macedonian J Med Sci 2020; 8:36-41.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 190-11-24
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.