Study of Blinking as a Function of Tear Film Quality (WINK)

March 23, 2026 updated by: Essilor International

Etude Des Clignements en Fonction de la Qualité du Film Lacrymal

The goal of this study is to better understand how eye blinking behavior is linked to the stability of the tear film, in adults aged 18 to 65 years, with or without symptoms of dry eye.

The main questions are:

  • Do the results of a New Blink Task reflect tear film stability ?
  • How are the blink related metrics in relation with each other? Researchers will compare two groups of participants-those without dry eye symptoms and those with dry eye symptoms-to see if blinking measures differ between them and whether these measures relate differently to tear film quality.

Participants will:

  • Answer a questionnaire about dry eye symptoms
  • Have their visual correction measured (if they wear glasses)
  • Undergo non-invasive assessments of tear film quality using an imaging device
  • Complete three types of blink tasks, each repeated three times, including measurements of blinking and of tear film stability

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
60

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • France
      • Paris, France, 94220
        • EssilorLuxottica - Neuroscience & Medical Research center
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Volunteer, fluent in French, willing to follow the protocol, able to read and understand the information sheet and provide free and informed consent
  • Covered by a social security
  • Aged between 18 and 65 years inclusive
  • Binocular near visual acuity ≤ 0.3 LogMAR (≥ 5/10) (corrective glasses accepted)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Employees of Essilor International, Luxottica, or GrandVision and their subsidiaries
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding women (Article L1121-5)
  • Individuals deprived of liberty by judicial or administrative decision, or hospitalized without consent under Articles L.3212-1 and L.3213-1, who do not fall under Article L.1121-8, and individuals admitted to a health or social care facility for purposes other than research
  • Adults unable or incapable of giving informed consent (Article L1121-8)
  • Participants currently in an exclusion period from another study
  • Participants deemed unfit to participate by the investigator for any reason that may affect subject safety or study integrity All categories of individuals particularly protected under French law are excluded from this research (Articles L1121-5 to L1121-9 of the French Public Health Code).
  • Use of eye drops or ophthalmic solutions within the last 2 hours
  • Wearing contact lenses within the last 48 hours
  • Reported history of severe ocular pathology such as glaucoma, retinitis pigmentosa, diabetic retinopathy, macular involvement, resulting in visual field loss or acuity loss (especially aphakia), except for dry eye (which is not an exclusion criterion)
  • Reported history of eye surgery or trauma to the eye or its adnexa excepted refractive surgery and cataract surgery
  • Reported history of eyelid abnormalities (ptosis)
  • Reported history of neurological deficits, including epilepsy or sensory-motor coordination disorders, vestibular or cerebellar pathology (e.g., balance disorders, nystagmus, Parkinson's disease)
  • Reported history of musculoskeletal disorders preventing maintenance of a fixed head position

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Basic Science
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Single arm
Other: Blink behaviour
Single intervention

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Evaluates the correlation between the Absolute Maximum Eye Aperture Duration measured in seconds and the non-invasive tear film break-up time measured in seconds measured with device IDRA .
Time Frame: Day one
Day one

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Evaluates the correlation between the Absolute Maximum Eye Aperture Duration measured in seconds with parameters of dry eye ( tears meniscus height (mm), bulbar redness grade (from 0 to 4), blink quality (in %)) measured with device IDRA .
Time Frame: Day one
Day one
Compares the coefficient of variation of the Absolute Maximum Eye Aperture Duration (in %) with the coefficient of variation of the non-invasive tear film break-up time (in %) measured with device IDRA .
Time Frame: Day one
Day one
Evaluate the effects of ocular surface characteristics, demographics, and task acceptability on two primary outcomes via linear regression model
Time Frame: Day one

Uses linear regression models to evaluate the effects of ocular surface characteristics (tears meniscus height (mm), bulbar redness grade (from 0 to 4), blink quality (in %) measured with device IDRA , demographics (age and gender), and task acceptability (questionnaire) on two primary outcomes:

Absolute Maximum Eye Aperture Duration (seconds) and the non-invasive tear film break-up time (seconds)
Day one
Evaluate the effects of ocular surface characteristics, demographics, and task acceptability on coefficient of variation of two primary outcomes via linear regression model
Time Frame: Day one

Uses linear regression models to evaluate the effects of ocular surface characteristics (tears meniscus height (mm), bulbar redness grade (from 0 to 4), blink quality (in %) measured with device IDRA , demographics (age and gender), and task acceptability (questionnaire) on two primary outcomes:

Absolute Maximum Eye Aperture Duration (seconds) and the non-invasive tear film break-up time (seconds) on coefficient two primary outcomes: Absolute Maximum Eye Aperture Duration (%) and the non-invasive tear film break-up time (%)
Day one

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Essilor International

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
March 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
June 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
June 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
March 17, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 23, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
March 30, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
March 30, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 23, 2026

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
March 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • WS10489
  • 2025-A02676-43 (Other Identifier: ANSM RCB)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings