Effect of the "EMS Back-Up" Ergonomic Program on Paramedics' Manual Handling Safety.
Investigation on the Benefit of a Structured Manual Handling Training Program Regarding Paramedics' Technical Proficiency, Knowledge, and Behavioral Intentions on Clinical Practice Safety.
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Liang-Fu Chen
- Phone Number: +886963055751
- Email: chris2372660@gmail.com
Study Locations
-
-
-
Taipei, Taiwan, 116
- Recruiting
- Taipei Municipal Wanfang Hospital
-
Contact:
- Liang-Fu Liang-Fu Chen
- Phone Number: +8860963055751
- Email: chris2372660@gmail.com
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Frontline Emergency Medical Technicians (EMTs) or paramedics.
- Active duty personnel involved in patient handling and transport.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Non-frontline personnel (administrative only).
- Students or trainees not yet in clinical practice.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Prevention
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: EMS Back-Up Training Group
|
A multi-modal training session including:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Total Score on the Standardized Manual Handling Checklist
Time Frame: Baseline (Pre-test) and Immediate Post-intervention (within 8 hours).
|
Technical proficiency is measured using the 9-item Standardized Manual Handling Checklist v3.0.
Each item is scored on a 3-point scale (0 = not achieved, 1 = partially achieved, 2 = fully achieved).
The total score is calculated by summing the scores of all 9 items, resulting in a range from 0 to 18.
A higher total score indicates a higher level of technical proficiency and safer manual patient handling performance.
|
Baseline (Pre-test) and Immediate Post-intervention (within 8 hours).
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Rated Perceived Exertion (RPE)
Time Frame: Baseline and Immediate Post-intervention.
|
Borg CR10 Scale (0-10), assessing the subjective physical effort during task execution.
|
Baseline and Immediate Post-intervention.
|
|
Score on the EMS Ergonomics and Safety Knowledge Test
Time Frame: Baseline and Immediate Post-intervention.
|
Theoretical knowledge is assessed via a 12-item multiple-choice and true/false questionnaire focusing on biomechanics, injury prevention, and the SAFE handling process.
Each correct answer is awarded 1 point.
The total score ranges from 0 to 12.
A higher score represents a greater understanding of occupational safety and ergonomic principles related to patient handling.
|
Baseline and Immediate Post-intervention.
|
|
Mean Score of Transtheoretical Model (TTM) Stages of Change
Time Frame: Baseline and Immediate Post-intervention.
|
Readiness for behavioral change is assessed using a 5-point scale corresponding to the TTM stages: 1 = Pre-contemplation, 2 = Contemplation, 3 = Preparation, 4 = Action, and 5 = Maintenance.
The result is reported as the mean stage score across 5 specific behavioral items (C1-C5).
The score ranges from 1 to 5, where a higher numerical value indicates a more advanced stage of readiness for adopting safe manual handling behaviors.
|
Baseline and Immediate Post-intervention.
|
|
Mean Score of Health Belief Model (HBM) Self-Efficacy Construct
Time Frame: Baseline and Immediate Post-intervention.
|
Perceived self-efficacy is measured using a 5-point Likert scale (1 = strongly disagree to 5 = strongly agree) based on two specific items (D10, D11) regarding the ability to perform and lead safe handling techniques.
The outcome is the mean of these items, ranging from 1 to 5. A higher score reflects a higher level of confidence in performing safe manual handling tasks.
|
Baseline and Immediate Post-intervention.
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Estimated)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- N202505088
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.