Evaluating Noninvasive Brain Stimulation for TMD Pain: A Feasibility Study
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Carla Campbell
- Phone Number: 612-625-6976
- Email: ohcrc@umn.edu
Study Locations
-
-
Minnesota
-
Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States, 55455
- Recruiting
- University of Minnesota
-
Contact:
- Carla Campbell
- Phone Number: 612-625-6976
- Email: ohcrc@umn.edu
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age 18 to 65 years.
- Diagnosis of temporomandibular disorder (TMD) based on the Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (DC-TMD).
- Pain intensity of at least 4/10 on the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) over the past two weeks.
- Chronic pain duration of at least three months, consistent with diagnosis of chronic TMD.
- Willingness to self-administer transcutaneous auricular nerve stimulation (tAN) at home and comply with study procedures.
- Fluency in English to ensure comprehension of study materials and assessments.
- Access to a smartphone or computer with internet to complete electronic study surveys and check-ins with the research team.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Neurological conditions that may interfere with study outcomes, including epilepsy, stroke, multiple sclerosis, or traumatic brain injury.
- Use of implanted neuromodulation devices, such as vagus nerve stimulators, deep brain stimulators, or cochlear implants.
- Unstable or severe psychiatric disorders, including active psychosis or severe depression with suicidal ideation.
- Pregnancy or intention to become pregnant during the study period.
- Skin conditions or other contraindications that prevent safe electrode placement on the auricular region (e.g., metal in the cymba concha that is unable or not willing to remove).
- History of trauma (e.g., skull fracture) or periauricular surgery (e.g., temporomandibular joint replacement, acoustic neuroma removal) which would affect the location and function of the target peripheral innervation.
- Use of both surgical and non-surgical bone conduction hearing devices.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Quadruple
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Active tAN
After the baseline assessments, participants will be trained to self-administer tAN at home according to their assigned condition (active or sham).
They will be instructed to use the device daily for a minimum of two hours (maximum is 24 hours) while recording any side effects.
The device's internal log will track session compliance, stimulation parameters, and usage frequency.
|
The intervention in this study is Transcutaneous Auricular Neurostimulation (tAN), a noninvasive neuromodulation technique that delivers mild electrical stimulation to the auricular branch of the vagus nerve (ABVN) via electrodes placed on the external ear.
|
|
Placebo Comparator: Sham Stimulation
The sham condition will mimic active stimulation without delivering therapeutically active parameters, defined as electrical stimulation being provided to the earpiece electrode.
The sham stimulation will be passive stimulation meaning that no electrical stimulation will be provided to the participant.
|
the sham condition will mimic active stimulation without delivering therapeutically active parameters, defined as electrical stimulation being provided to the earpiece electrode.
The sham stimulation will be passive stimulation meaning that no electrical stimulation will be provided to the participant.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Retention Rate
Time Frame: Week 6
|
The proportion of enrolled participants who complete both baseline and post-treatment assessments.
A retention rate of ≥50% is considered feasible.
|
Week 6
|
|
Intervention Adherence
Time Frame: Week 4
|
The percentage of prescribed tAN sessions completed by each participant, as recorded in the internal device log.
Feasibility is defined as ≥50% adherence to scheduled sessions.
|
Week 4
|
|
Acceptability
Time Frame: Week 4
|
Measured using a post-treatment Likert scale survey, where participants will rate comfort, usability, and willingness to use tAN again on a 1 to 5 scale.
A mean acceptability score of ≥3/5 indicates feasibility.
|
Week 4
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Donald Nixdorf, MD, University of Minnesota
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- DENT-2025-34560
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.