Increasing Lung Cancer Screening Among Emergency Department Patients - LCS R01

April 28, 2026 updated by: David Adler, University of Rochester

Increasing Lung Cancer Screening Uptake Among Emergency Department Patients - LCS R01

This randomized clinical trial evaluates the effectiveness of text messaging and facilitated referral strategies to increase lung cancer screening uptake among emergency department patients who meet lung cancer screening eligibility criteria.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

This randomized clinical trial will evaluate strategies to improve lung cancer screening uptake among emergency department patients who meet lung cancer screening eligibility criteria based on age and smoking history. Participants will be randomized using a 2 by 2 factorial design into one of four groups: basic referral, basic referral plus text messaging, facilitated referral, or facilitated referral plus text messaging.

The basic referral strategy includes verbal referral to the lung cancer screening program and primary care provider, if applicable, along with written contact information for the lung cancer screening program navigator. The facilitated referral strategy includes submission of a lung cancer screening requisition to the lung cancer screening program on behalf of the participant during the emergency department visit.

The text messaging intervention includes a series of theory informed messages designed to increase intention and motivation to complete lung cancer screening. Lung cancer screening uptake will be assessed at 120 days after enrollment using participant follow up and electronic health record review.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
1036

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 50 - 80
  • ≥ 20 pack-year smoking history
  • current smoker or quit within 15 years
  • English/Spanish speaking
  • Registered in the Emergency Department as a patient

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Non-English/Spanish
  • Inability to provide consent (e.g. high clinical acuity, cognitive deficit)
  • Lack of text-capable mobile phone and/or inability to use text function

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Screening
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Factorial Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: Basic Referral (enhanced control arm)
Participants assigned to this arm will be notified that they are eligible and meet federal recommendations for lung cancer screening. They will be verbally referred to a lung cancer screening program and their primary care provider (if they have one) to discuss lung cancer screening. They will also be provided with written materials that include telephone contact information for the lung cancer screening program navigator. If contacted, the LCS Program Navigator will conduct a discussion, schedule a screening CT scan at one of the 8 regional American College of Radiology-designated lung cancer screening centers and arrange clinical follow-up as needed.
Behavioral: Basic Referral
Participants are verbally referred to the lung cancer screening program and their primary care provider if applicable. Written materials with contact information for the lung cancer screening program navigator are provided.
Experimental: Basic Referral plus Text Messaging
Participants assigned to this arm will receive the basic referral as described in the previous arm. In addition, they will receive a series of text messages, aimed at generating intention and motivation to get lung cancer screening. Patients will receive a total of 9 messages.
Behavioral: Basic Referral
Participants are verbally referred to the lung cancer screening program and their primary care provider if applicable. Written materials with contact information for the lung cancer screening program navigator are provided.
Behavioral: Text Messaging
Participants receive a series of up to 9 theory informed text messages designed to increase awareness, motivation, and completion of lung cancer screening.
Active Comparator: Facilitated Referral
Participants assigned to this arm will be notified that they are eligible and meet federal recommendations for lung cancer screening. Rather than the basic referral received in the arms above, a lung cancer screening requisition form will be submitted to the lung cancer screening program on behalf of the participant during their emergency department visit.
Behavioral: Facilitated Referral
A lung cancer screening requisition form is submitted to the lung cancer screening program on behalf of the participant during the emergency department visit. The screening program will contact the participant to discuss screening and schedule a low dose CT scan if appropriate.
Experimental: Facilitated Referral plus Text Messaging
Participants assigned to this arm will receive facilitated referral plus the series of text messages described above. Among these participants, contact with the lung cancer screening program is likely to occur after receipt of the initial text messages but prior to receipt of all text messages.
Behavioral: Text Messaging
Participants receive a series of up to 9 theory informed text messages designed to increase awareness, motivation, and completion of lung cancer screening.
Behavioral: Facilitated Referral
A lung cancer screening requisition form is submitted to the lung cancer screening program on behalf of the participant during the emergency department visit. The screening program will contact the participant to discuss screening and schedule a low dose CT scan if appropriate.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Proportion of Participants Who Complete Lung Cancer Screening Within 120 Days After Enrollment
Time Frame: Up to 120 Days After Enrollment
Lung cancer screening uptake is defined as completion of a low dose computed tomography scan for lung cancer screening within 120 days after enrollment. Screening completion will be confirmed using electronic health record review, lung cancer screening program records, or participant self report obtained during follow up. The outcome is reported as the proportion of participants who complete screening.
Up to 120 Days After Enrollment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Proportion of Participants Who Participate in Shared Decision Making for Lung Cancer Screening Within 120 Days After Enrollment
Time Frame: Up to 120 Days After Enrollment
Participation in shared decision making is defined as documentation of a shared decision making discussion regarding lung cancer screening or participant self report of completing such a discussion within 120 days after enrollment. The outcome is reported as the proportion of participants who participate in shared decision making.
Up to 120 Days After Enrollment
Frequency of Reported Barriers to Lung Cancer Screening at 120 Days
Time Frame: 120 Days After Enrollment
Barriers to lung cancer screening are assessed using participant responses to a structured questionnaire administered at follow up. The questionnaire includes items on transportation challenges, cost concerns, scheduling difficulties, and fear of screening results. The outcome is reported as the number and proportion of participants reporting each barrier.
120 Days After Enrollment
Acceptability of Emergency Department Based Lung Cancer Screening Interventions at 120 Days
Time Frame: Up to 120 Days After Enrollment
Acceptability is assessed using participant responses to Likert scale questionnaire items evaluating the degree to which participants find the emergency department based lung cancer screening interventions acceptable. Each item is scored on a 5 point Likert scale ranging from 1 to 5, with higher scores indicating greater acceptability. The outcome is reported as summary scores based on participant responses.
Up to 120 Days After Enrollment
Appropriateness of Emergency Department Based Lung Cancer Screening Interventions at 120 Days
Time Frame: 120 Days After Enrollment
Appropriateness is assessed using participant responses to Likert scale questionnaire items evaluating the perceived fit and relevance of emergency department based lung cancer screening interventions. Each item is scored on a 5 point Likert scale ranging from 1 to 5, with higher scores indicating greater perceived appropriateness. The outcome is reported as summary scores based on participant responses.
120 Days After Enrollment
Frequency of Reported Facilitators to Lung Cancer Screening at 120 Days
Time Frame: 120 Days After Enrollment
Facilitators to lung cancer screening are assessed using participant responses to a structured questionnaire administered at follow up. The questionnaire includes items related to factors such as access to care, health literacy, prior healthcare engagement, and presence of a primary care provider. The outcome is reported as the number and proportion of participants reporting each facilitator.
120 Days After Enrollment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University of Rochester

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
March 1, 2027

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 1, 2030

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 1, 2031

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
April 27, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 28, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
May 5, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
May 5, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 28, 2026

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
April 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • FP00007604

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

IPD Plan Description

Undecided

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings