How TENS Affects Pain, Medication Use, and Muscle Function in Older Adults With Hip Fractures (TENS-HIP)
Effects of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) on Pain and Analgesic Use and the Association of Clinical and Psychosocial Factors With Muscle Function in Older Adults With Hip Fracture
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) can reduce perioperative pain in older adults with hip fractures. It will also evaluate its effects on physiological and psychological outcomes. The main questions it aims to answer are:
Does adding TENS to usual care during the preoperative phase reduce pain intensity and analgesic consumption? Does TENS affect pressure pain threshold and vital signs (blood pressure, heart rate, and respiratory rate)?
Researchers will compare active TENS to sham TENS (no perceptible stimulation) to see if TENS is effective in reducing pain and improving related outcomes.
Participants will:
- Undergo a standardized baseline assessment, including evaluation of pain, vital signs, anxiety, discomfort, and pressure pain threshold
- Complete questionnaires assessing quality of life, physical activity, depressive symptoms, anxiety, fear of falling, and pain catastrophizing
- Be randomly assigned to receive either active TENS or sham TENS
- Receive a single 45-minute TENS session
- Have their analgesic use recorded for the 24 hours before and after the intervention.
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Hip fractures in older adults are commonly associated with significant perioperative pain, which is often managed with opioid analgesics despite their potential adverse effects. Non-pharmacological and non-invasive strategies, such as transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS), have been proposed as adjunctive approaches for pain management. While previous studies have primarily focused on postoperative applications, the effects of TENS during the preoperative phase remain unclear.
This randomized clinical trial will include 32 older adults diagnosed with hip fracture. After providing written informed consent, participants will undergo a standardized baseline assessment. Demographic and clinical data, including age, sex, marital status, and education level, will be collected through an anamnesis form.
Physiological and clinical outcomes will be assessed before and after the intervention. These include vital signs (blood pressure, heart rate, and respiratory rate), pain intensity, discomfort level, anxiety level, and pressure pain threshold. Additionally, validated instruments will be applied once prior to the intervention to assess broader health domains, including quality of life (SF-36), physical activity level (International Physical Activity Questionnaire - IPAQ), depressive symptoms (Geriatric Depression Scale), anxiety symptoms (State-Trait Anxiety Inventory), fear of falling (Falls Efficacy Scale International), and pain catastrophizing (Pain Catastrophizing Scale).
Following baseline assessments, participants will be randomly assigned to one of two groups. The intervention group (G1) will receive active TENS, with intensity adjusted to the maximum level tolerated by the participant. The control group (G2) will receive sham TENS, with intensity set at a sub-sensory level without perceptible stimulation. The intervention will consist of a single session lasting 45 minutes.
Analgesic consumption will be evaluated based on the type and quantity of medications used by participants in the 24 hours before and 24 hours after the intervention. These data will be obtained from medical records and prescription information.
This study aims to provide evidence regarding the effectiveness of preoperative TENS as an adjunct to usual care for pain management and its potential influence on physiological and psychological outcomes in older adults with hip fractures.
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: ISABEL PAZ, PhD
- Phone Number: +55 51 3591-1122
- Email: idealmeidapaz@gmail.com
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Older adults (male and female) diagnosed with hip fracture
- Age ≥ 60 years
- Admitted to the hospital inpatient unit (HPS)
- Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score ≥ 20
Exclusion Criteria:
- Conditions contraindicating electrical stimulation, such as presence of a pacemaker, significant sensory loss in the lower limbs, or skin lesions at the electrode placement site
- History of neurological or cognitive impairment that may interfere with understanding of the assessments
- Previous treatment with neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) in the lower limb within the last 3 months
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Active TENS
Group 1 will receive active TENS, with intensity adjusted to the maximum level tolerated by the participant.
|
Active transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) will be applied for 45 minutes, with intensity adjusted to the maximum level tolerated by the participant.
|
|
Sham Comparator: Sham TENS
Group 2 will receive sham TENS, with intensity adjusted to a sub-sensory level (no perceptible stimulation).
|
Sham transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) will be applied for 45 minutes, with intensity set at a sub-sensory level, with no perceptible stimulation.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Pain intensity
Time Frame: Before and immediately after the intervention (single session)
|
Pain intensity will be assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), ranging from 0 to 10, where 0 indicates no pain and 10 indicates worst imaginable pain.
Higher scores represent worse outcomes.
|
Before and immediately after the intervention (single session)
|
|
Pressure pain threshold
Time Frame: Before and immediately after the intervention
|
Pressure pain threshold will be measured using a pressure algometer.
|
Before and immediately after the intervention
|
|
Blood pressure
Time Frame: Before and immediately after the intervention
|
Blood pressure will be measured before and after the intervention.
|
Before and immediately after the intervention
|
|
Analgesic consumption
Time Frame: 24 hours before and 24 hours after the intervention
|
Analgesic use will be assessed based on the type and quantity of medications recorded in medical records.
|
24 hours before and 24 hours after the intervention
|
|
Quality of life (SF-36)
Time Frame: Baseline (pre-intervention)
|
Quality of life will be assessed using the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36), ranging from 0 to 100, where higher scores indicate better quality of life.
|
Baseline (pre-intervention)
|
|
Physical activity level (IPAQ)
Time Frame: Baseline
|
Physical activity level will be assessed using the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ), expressed in MET-minutes/week.
Higher values indicate higher levels of physical activity.
|
Baseline
|
|
Depressive symptoms
Time Frame: Baseline
|
Depressive symptoms will be assessed using the Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS), ranging from 0 to 15, where higher scores indicate more severe depressive symptoms.
|
Baseline
|
|
Anxiety symptoms
Time Frame: Baseline
|
Anxiety will be assessed using the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI), ranging from 20 to 80, where higher scores indicate greater anxiety levels.
|
Baseline
|
|
Fear of falling
Time Frame: Baseline
|
Fear of falling will be assessed using the Falls Efficacy Scale International (FES-I), ranging from 16 to 64, where higher scores indicate greater concern about falling.
|
Baseline
|
|
Pain catastrophizing
Time Frame: Baseline
|
Pain catastrophizing will be assessed using the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), ranging from 0 to 52, where higher scores indicate greater levels of catastrophizing.
|
Baseline
|
|
Heart rate
Time Frame: Before and immediately after the intervention
|
Heart rate will be measured before and after the intervention.
|
Before and immediately after the intervention
|
|
Respiratory rate
Time Frame: Before and immediately after the intervention
|
Respiratory rate will be measured before and after the intervention.
|
Before and immediately after the intervention
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Estimated)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 96034926.1.0000.5338
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Hip Fractures
-
NCT07178756Active, not recruitingHip Fracture Surgeries | Post-operative Hip Fractures Recovery
-
NCT00595634TerminatedUnstable Intertrochanteric Hip Fractures
-
NCT06765083Not yet recruitingHip Fractures (i.e. Femoral Neck or Intertrochanteric Hip Fractures)
-
NCT07591311RecruitingHip Surgery | Hip Arthroplasty
-
NCT07427082CompletedFemoral Neck Fractures | Hip Surgery
-
NCT07178041Recruiting
-
NCT07556263RecruitingHip Fractures (ICD-10 72.01-72.2)
-
NCT02294747CompletedHip Fractures | Trochanteric Fractures | Intertrochanteric Fractures
-
NCT01238068UnknownIntertrochanteric Fractures of the Hip
Clinical Trials on Active Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS)
-
NCT06341673RecruitingOveractive Bladder Syndrome
-
NCT05678101Active, not recruitingHip Fractures | Orthopedic Disorder | Post Operative Pain | Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip | Internal Fixation
-
NCT02445677Withdrawn
-
NCT06834308Completed
-
NCT04936451Terminated
-
NCT02678403Terminated
-
NCT04399707UnknownAnalgesia | Cesarean Section | Transcutaneous Electric Nerve Stimulation
-
NCT04004052Completed
-
NCT06240260RecruitingAnalgesia | Pain, Acute | Patient Preference | IUD
-
NCT03968796CompletedLateral Epicondylitis (Tennis Elbow) Bilateral | Pain in Arm, Unspecified | Tenosynovitis Elbow