AI in Endoscopic Transsphenoidal Surgery

April 30, 2026 updated by: University College, London

The Application of Artificial Intelligence to Patients Undergoing Endoscopic Transsphenoidal Surgery: a Single-site Prospective Feasibility and Exploratory Study (IDEAL Stage 1 and 2a)

This study focuses on bringing artificial intelligence into the operating room to assist with pituitary tumour surgeries performed through the nose. These procedures are technically demanding, and training new surgeons is often inconsistent. To address this, researchers at the National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery are testing AI systems that "watch" surgical videos in real-time to identify anatomy, instruments, and the specific phase of the operation.

The core goal of the prospective trial is to improve education and team coordination without interfering with the surgery itself. The AI displays its analysis on tablets positioned for the surgical residents and nurses, rather than the lead surgeon. This setup allows the team to follow the procedure's progress, key anatomy and anticipate next steps without the surgeon needing to stop and explain. Because hospital internet can be unreliable, the study is prioritizing specialized hardware from NVIDIA that processes data locally. This "edge computing" approach ensures the AI is fast and doesn't require a live cloud connection to function.

This trial will assess the device feasibility (IDEAL Stage 1 study, ~6 cases), followed by early safety and system technical refinement (IDEAL 2a study, ~20-30 cases).

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
30

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Early Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United Kingdom
      • London, United Kingdom
        • National Hospital For Neurology and Neurosurgery

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

The inclusion criteria will be:

  1. Adult patients (above the age of 18 years old)
  2. Undergoing endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery
  3. Able to provide consent

The exclusion criteria will be:

  1. Patients less than 18 years of age
  2. Undergoing transcranial surgery or microscopic transsphenoidal surgery
  3. Unable to provide consent e.g., cannot understand, mental illness, or later withdrawing consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Intervention Arm
Device: Live intra-op AI analysis of endoscopic video feed, with output displayed on supplementary monitor
Live intra-op AI analysis of endoscopic video feed, with output displayed on supplementary monitor

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Feasibility of live AI video analysis
Time Frame: Immediately after the intervention/procedure/surgery
The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the feasibility of the TouchSurgery platform or NVIDIA AGx/IGx based platforms for prospective AI-based surgical video analysis (via observation, validated implementation assessment and human factors questionnaires; and semi-structured interviews of surgical team members).
Immediately after the intervention/procedure/surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Safety
Time Frame: Perioperatively/periprocedurally (surgeon distraction, team disruption); and immediately after the intervention/procedure/surgery (output accuracy, volatility and latency)
  • observation for operating surgeon distraction: recorded as discrete instances of unplanned disruption of primary surgeon workflow per surgery, as observed by observer from research team
  • wider surgical team workflow disruption : recorded as discrete instances of unplanned disruption of wider surgical team workflow per surgery, as observed by observer from research team
  • AI output inaccuracy and volatility: measured via sampling of 3-5x clips (30-60sec at 5fps) during which surgical scene is static (i.e. during routine anatomical verification checks), and calculating DICE scores (vs groundtruth segmentations) for accuracy estimation and DICE/sec for volatility estimatipon.
  • AI output latency: measured as discrete instances of unacceptably elevated latency (>200ms) of the AI output display vs the primary direct surgical feed, as observed by observer from research team.
Perioperatively/periprocedurally (surgeon distraction, team disruption); and immediately after the intervention/procedure/surgery (output accuracy, volatility and latency)
Educational yield
Time Frame: Immediately after the intervention/procedure/surgery

To evaluate the utility of the platform for educational purposes.

Via structured educational yield questionnaire of surgeons involved in each case
Immediately after the intervention/procedure/surgery
Surgical outcomes
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
  • Surgical performance vs matched cohort: measured via modified OSATS on independent surgical video review
  • Surgical outcomes vs matched cohort: measured via comparative analysis of standardised outcome set
Through study completion, an average of 1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University College, London

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
University College London Hospitals

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
June 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
August 1, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
January 31, 2029

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
March 30, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 30, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
May 5, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
May 5, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 30, 2026

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
April 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 127474

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Available upon formal reasonable request

IPD Sharing Time Frame

To be specific in data transfer agreement

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

To be specific in data transfer agreement

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • ICF
  • CSR

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pituitary Adenoma

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings