Comparing Whole-Body Vibration vs. Balance Board Exercise for Pain, Function, and Quality of Life in Obese Adults With Knee Osteoarthritis
Comparison of the Effectiveness of Balance Training Using Stochastic Resonance Therapy-Whole Body Vibration and Balanced Board in Obese Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
DKI Jakarta
-
Jakarta Pusat, DKI Jakarta, Indonesia, 10430
- Universitas Indonesia, Cipto Mangunkusumo General Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- 45-65 years old patient
- VAS score ranged from 4 - 6
- Diagnosed with knee OA KL Grade I - II based on American College of Rheumatology Classification
- Grade I obesity
- Understand Bahasa Indonesia
Exclusion Criteria:
- Used assistive devices or can't walk
- Diagnosed with other medical conditions or mentally unstable
- Diagnosed with advanced stage of osteoporosis
- Had history of knee surgery
- Were currently taking analgesic or anti-inflammatory medications
- Pregnant
- Unwilling to participate
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Stochastic Resonance Therapy-Whole Body Vibration
Subjects assigned to the SRT-WBV group were required to stand on the footboard of the SRT-WBV (SR Therapiesysteme GmbH & Co. Lifescience KG, Berlin) device with shoulder width stance, and knees bent at 30 degrees, facing forward.
The trim settings progressed from weak (45 seconds with 8 repetitions), to mild (55 seconds with 8 repetitions), average (60 seconds with 6 repetitions), and strong (60 seconds with 6 repetitions), with intensity increased at two-week intervals.
Each repetition was separated by a resting period that had the same duration as the trim settings (weak: 45 seconds, mild: 55 seconds, average and strong: 60 seconds).
|
A total of 16 therapeutic exercise sessions were conducted during the intervention where 2 sessions were conducted every week, separated by at least one day.
Specifically, subjects assigned to either group, with each session began with standardized warm-up exercises lasting approximately 5-10 minutes, followed by specific therapeutic exercises such as SRT-WBV and Balance Board.
Other Names:
|
|
Active Comparator: Balance Board
Subjects were required to stand on the balance board with knees bent at 30 degrees and both hands placed on the chest with eyes opened.
The balance board intervention used different durations as its intensity, such as 7.5 minutes, 10 minutes, 12.5 minutes, and 15 minutes continuously without resting period.
The intensity of exercise was progressively increased every 2 weeks until completion of the program.
|
The balance board intervention used different durations as its intensity, such as 7.5 minutes, 10 minutes, 12.5 minutes, and 15 minutes continuously without resting period.
The intensity of exercise was progressively increased every 2 weeks until completion of the program.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Knee function (WOMAC Total Score)
Time Frame: 8 weeks
|
Knee function was assessed using the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis (WOMAC) questionnaire where pain score, stiffness, and physical function were evaluated on a scale of 0-4, with higher scores indicating worse pain, stiffness, and functional limitations.
The questionnaire contains 24 items and the WOMAC Osteoarthritis Index scores were then derived from the sum of the scores for the three subscales It was administered at the beginning and completion of the intervention, as well as every 4 weeks during the intervention.
|
8 weeks
|
|
Timed Up and Go Test (Balance)
Time Frame: 8 weeks
|
Balance and mobility will be assessed using the Timed Up and Go Test.
The time (in seconds) taken to stand up from a chair, walk 3 meters, turn, return, and sit down will be recorded.
|
8 weeks
|
|
Straight Leg Raise Test
Time Frame: 8 weeks
|
Balance/flexibility will be assessed using the Straight Leg Raise test.
The maximum angle (in degrees) achieved during leg elevation will be recorded.
|
8 weeks
|
|
Knee Pain (VAS Score)
Time Frame: 8 weeks
|
Knee pain will be measured using the Visual Analog Scale ranging from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating greater pain.
Participants will rate their pain at rest while seated.
|
8 weeks
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Quality of Life (SF-12 Score)
Time Frame: 8 weeks
|
Quality of life will be assessed using the SF-12.
Scores will be calculated according to standard scoring procedures.
|
8 weeks
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Collaborators
Collaborators
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Tirza Z Tamin, MD, Indonesia University
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- SRTKneeOsteoarthritis
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.