PERsistance of Long-Acting inJEctable CAB+RPV in a Cohort of Virologically-suppressed PLWH: a Real-life Study (PERLAJE)

May 5, 2026 updated by: Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS

Evaluating Persistence of Switching From Oral RPV/FTC/TAF to Long- Acting Injectable CAB+RPV in a Cohort of Virologically-suppressed PLWH: a Real-life Study

People living with HIV (PLWH) need to take antiretroviral therapy (ART) long-life. The development of new and more effective ART regimens has increased viral suppression and improved the recovery of immune function, leading to an extension of the lifespan of PLWH. However, antiretroviral drugs have short- and long-term side effects. In fact, ART has recently been reported as one of the significant factors associated with metabolic syndromes (obesity, liver disease, and factor). This insidious progression of long-term metabolic complications has become a new challenge for our clinics. Therefore, optimizing ART in the context of viral suppression is mandatory. In recent years, thanks to the availability of more potent drugs with a high genetic barrier, simplification strategies have been explored with various regimens containing fewer drugs for PLWH who are virologically suppressed on a standard three-drug regimen. Based on international guidelines, following the results of clinical trials, two-drug regimens are now recommended as pro-active switch strategies within preventive strategies to reduce morbidity in PLWH. Following the results of the ATALS-2M, FLAIR, and SOLAR studies, the long-acting parenteral regimen containing cabotegravir and rilpivirine (CAB+RPV), administered every 2 months, has been included in the guidelines as a pro-active switch strategy for maintaining virological suppression. Cabotegravir, a new integrase inhibitor (INI), has demonstrated high efficacy, excellent tolerability, and safety, with a higher-than-average genetic barrier.

Rilpivirine is a non-nucloside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) with potent virological efficacy and a favorable safety profile compared to other NNRTIs. This type of strategy has several primary advantages: improve adherence, especially in complex PLWH, easier to integrate into daily activities, less likely to generate stigma and/or discrimination.

Furthermore, intramuscular administration, bypassing intestinal metabolism, potentially reduces the severity of drug-drug interactions. In light of the growing attention to the metabolic impact of various antiretroviral therapy regimens and their associated adverse events, it is crucial to examine the tolerability of this injectable regimen as a medium- and long-term switching strategy. The results of the Phase 3 studies are based on populations with a short exposure to antiretroviral drugs, which may not be generalized to PLWH with a long history of ART, who represent the majority of patients in clinical practice in high-income countries. This study aims, in a clinical practice setting, to evaluate the cumulative probability of treatment discontinuation (TD) at 48 weeks in PLWH switching to the injectable LA CAB + RPV (LAI CAB + RPV) regimen from an oral regimen with rilpivirine/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide fumarate (RPV + FTC + TAF).

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
200

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

N/A

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

HIV patients who, according to clinical practice, are recommended to switch to LAI CAB+RPV from an oral regimen with RPV+FTC+TAF;

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥ 18 years
  • HIV infection
  • Virologically suppression (defined as VL<50 copies/mL in at least two consecutive determinations with a minimum interval of at least two months±2weeks between each determination)
  • Informed consent form signed

Exclusion Criteria:

  • none

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Evaluation of persistance on LAI CAB+RPV over 48 weeks
Time Frame: 1 year

Evaluation of the proportion of PLWH remaining on LAI CAB+RPV without treatment discontinuation (TD) for any reasons over 48 weeks. TD will be considered at the occurrence of VF (defined as 2 consecutive HIV RNA levels ≥50 copies/mL or a single level ≥1000 copies/mL after initiation of LAI CAB+RPV) or at switching to another regimen for any reason.

The primary endpoint will be estimated according to an Intention to treat (ITT) approach in which all the participants enrolled who received at least one dose of LAI CAB+RPV will be included: the week 48 analysis will take place after the last participant has its week 48 viral load.
1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Simona Di Giambenedetto, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
June 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
June 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
June 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
May 5, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 5, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
May 12, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
May 12, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 5, 2026

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
May 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 18140 (City of Hope Medical Center)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on HIV-1-infection

Clinical Trials on Cabotegravir/Rilpivirine

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings