A Post-Market Assessment of the Safety and Performance of the TriClip™ System (TREAT TR)

August 31, 2026 updated by: Abbott Medical Devices

A Post-Market Assessment of the Safety and Performance of the TriClip™ System (TREAT TR)

The objective of the TREAT TR study is to confirm the safety and performance of the TriClip System for tricuspid TEER in a contemporary, real-world setting, using the commercially available device in accordance with its approved indications for use.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

TREAT TR is a prospective, observational, single-arm, multi-center, post-market study designed to confirm the safety and performance of the TriClip System in a contemporary, real-world setting in accordance with its approved indications for use. The study will be conducted at up to 100 centers globally. Clinical investigation assessments will be conducted prior to the procedure to assess eligibility. Follow-up visits after the TriClip procedure will occur at discharge, 30 days, 6 months (telephone), 12 months, and annually through 5-years. An independent echocardiographic core laboratory (ECL) will be utilized for evaluating echocardiograms. An imaging substudy will be conducted at a subset of participating sites in up to 250 subjects who consent to participate in the substudy. Cardiac-gated computed tomography (CT) will be performed at baseline and 12 months to evaluate reverse cardiac remodeling.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
1000

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

  • Italy
    • Lombard
      • Milan, Lombard, Italy, 20132
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Ospedale San Raffaele - Cardiac
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Francesco Maisano
        • Contact:
  • Spain
      • Barcelona, Spain, 08036
        • Recruiting
        • Hospital Clinic de Barcelona
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Xavier Freixa Rofastes
        • Contact:
    • Principality of Asturias
      • Oviedo, Principality of Asturias, Spain, 33011
        • Recruiting
        • Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Pablo Avanzas, MD, PhD
        • Contact:
  • United States
    • California
      • La Jolla, California, United States, 92037
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Scripps Health
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Matthew Price, MD
        • Contact:
    • Illinois
      • Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60611
        • Recruiting
        • Northwestern Memorial Hospital
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Akhil Narang, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Anita Asgar, MD
    • Texas
      • Austin, Texas, United States, 78705
        • Recruiting
        • Ascension Texas Cardiovascular Research
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Mark Gajjar, MD
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

This clinical investigation will enroll subjects from the general population who are scheduled to undergo the TriClip procedure per the current approved regional IFU.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Subject is eligible to receive the TriClip System per the current approved indications for use and is intended to undergo the procedure.
  2. Subject, or their legally authorized representative, has provided written informed consent prior to study procedure.
  3. Subject agrees to attend follow-up assessments.
  4. Subject is ≥ 18 years of age (or legal age of consent) at time of consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Subject is participating in another clinical study that could impact the follow-up or results of this study.
  2. Subject has an existing TriClip implant
  3. Presence of other conditions or factors that, in the Investigator's opinion, could limit the subject's ability to participate in follow-up.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Rate of Peri-Procedural Adverse Events
Time Frame: Through 30 days post-procedure
Defined as all-cause mortality, device embolization, device thrombosis, non-elective surgery or transcatheter intervention for device- or procedure-related adverse event (AE) new pacemaker implantation and device- or procedure related major bleeding
Through 30 days post-procedure
Tricuspid Regurgitation (TR) grade less than or equal to moderate
Time Frame: At 30-day follow-up
At 30-day follow-up
Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire Overall Summary (KCCQ-OS) score improvement of at least 10 points
Time Frame: At 30-day follow-up
All KCCQ scores are scaled from 0 (worst) to 100 (best possible status), where the higher score reflects a better health status.
At 30-day follow-up

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Abbott Medical Devices

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Director: Meghan Griffin, Abbott

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
July 2, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
September 1, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
August 1, 2033

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
May 8, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 8, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
May 14, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
September 2, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 31, 2026

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
July 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • ABT-CIP-10594

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings