Using Artificial Intelligence To Improve Ventilator Settings For Intensive Care Patients
Research on Intelligent Optimization of Ventilator Parameters for Intensive Care Patients Based on Multimodal Large Models
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Zhejiang
-
Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China, 325000
- The Second Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University and Yuying Children's Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Child
- Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- PICU patients aged 1 month to 18 years.
- Receiving invasive mechanical ventilation, expected to last ≥ 48 hours.
- Informed consent signed prior to enrollment.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Expected survival < 24 hours
- Irreversible brain injury (GCS = 3 + absence of brainstem reflexes)
- Severe congenital cardiopulmonary malformations affecting ventilation assessment
- Pregnancy (must be ruled out in adolescent girls)
- Currently participating in other ventilation intervention trials
- Guardian refusal to participate
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
Number of groups / cohorts
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / CohortGroup / Cohort |
|---|
|
AI-Assisted Ventilator Parameter Optimization in Pediatric ICU
Clinical data from key time points following tracheal intubation in each pediatric patient were input into an AI system to generate recommendations.
These recommendations were then compared against the actual adjustments made by physicians, enabling a counterfactual assessment to determine whether-had the AI's suggestions been adopted-the number of ventilator-free days within a 28-day period would have been superior.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Number of ventilator-free days within 28 days
Time Frame: From the start of tracheal intubation until 28 days after tracheal intubation.
|
Days survived and free from invasive ventilation
|
From the start of tracheal intubation until 28 days after tracheal intubation.
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
mortality rate
Time Frame: 28 and 90 days after the initiation of tracheal intubation
|
All-cause mortality at 28 and 90 days following tracheal intubation
|
28 and 90 days after the initiation of tracheal intubation
|
|
Mechanical Ventilation-Related Complications
Time Frame: From the start of tracheal intubation to Day 28
|
Cumulative duration of mechanical ventilation, reintubation rate (within 48 hours of extubation), ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP), barotrauma.
|
From the start of tracheal intubation to Day 28
|
|
Length of Hospital Stay
Time Frame: The duration from the time of admission to discharge for pediatric patients-up to a maximum of three months.
|
PICU Length of Stay, Total Hospital Length of Stay
|
The duration from the time of admission to discharge for pediatric patients-up to a maximum of three months.
|
|
Artificial Intelligence System Evaluation
Time Frame: From the start of tracheal intubation to Day 28
|
Physician Adoption Rates and Outcomes of Cases Involving Discrepancies Between AI Recommendations and Physician Decisions
|
From the start of tracheal intubation to Day 28
|
|
Health Economics
Time Frame: The duration from the time of admission to discharge for pediatric patients-up to a maximum of three months.
|
PICU Hospitalization Costs
|
The duration from the time of admission to discharge for pediatric patients-up to a maximum of three months.
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Gattinoni L, Tonetti T, Cressoni M, Cadringher P, Herrmann P, Moerer O, Protti A, Gotti M, Chiurazzi C, Carlesso E, Chiumello D, Quintel M. Ventilator-related causes of lung injury: the mechanical power. Intensive Care Med. 2016 Oct;42(10):1567-1575. doi: 10.1007/s00134-016-4505-2. Epub 2016 Sep 12.
- Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Network; Brower RG, Matthay MA, Morris A, Schoenfeld D, Thompson BT, Wheeler A. Ventilation with lower tidal volumes as compared with traditional tidal volumes for acute lung injury and the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2000 May 4;342(18):1301-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200005043421801.
- Fleuren LM, Klausch TLT, Zwager CL, Schoonmade LJ, Guo T, Roggeveen LF, Swart EL, Girbes ARJ, Thoral P, Ercole A, Hoogendoorn M, Elbers PWG. Machine learning for the prediction of sepsis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy. Intensive Care Med. 2020 Mar;46(3):383-400. doi: 10.1007/s00134-019-05872-y. Epub 2020 Jan 21.
- Char DS, Shah NH, Magnus D. Implementing Machine Learning in Health Care - Addressing Ethical Challenges. N Engl J Med. 2018 Mar 15;378(11):981-983. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1714229. No abstract available.
- Pirracchio R, Petersen ML, Carone M, Rigon MR, Chevret S, van der Laan MJ. Mortality prediction in intensive care units with the Super ICU Learner Algorithm (SICULA): a population-based study. Lancet Respir Med. 2015 Jan;3(1):42-52. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(14)70239-5. Epub 2014 Nov 24.
- Chen JH, Asch SM. Machine Learning and Prediction in Medicine - Beyond the Peak of Inflated Expectations. N Engl J Med. 2017 Jun 29;376(26):2507-2509. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1702071. No abstract available.
- Komorowski M, Celi LA, Badawi O, Gordon AC, Faisal AA. The Artificial Intelligence Clinician learns optimal treatment strategies for sepsis in intensive care. Nat Med. 2018 Nov;24(11):1716-1720. doi: 10.1038/s41591-018-0213-5. Epub 2018 Oct 22.
- Esteva A, Robicquet A, Ramsundar B, Kuleshov V, DePristo M, Chou K, Cui C, Corrado G, Thrun S, Dean J. A guide to deep learning in healthcare. Nat Med. 2019 Jan;25(1):24-29. doi: 10.1038/s41591-018-0316-z. Epub 2019 Jan 7.
- Topol EJ. High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence. Nat Med. 2019 Jan;25(1):44-56. doi: 10.1038/s41591-018-0300-7. Epub 2019 Jan 7.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2026-K-78-01
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.