Digital Patient-Reported Assessment in Older Adults With Acute Leukemia

August 4, 2026 updated by: Teresa Bernal del Castillo, Fundación para la Investigación Biosanitaria del Principado de Asturias

Feasibility of a Structured Digital Patient-Reported Assessment Pathway in Older Adults With Acute Leukemia: A Prospective Single-Center Pilot Study

This pilot study will evaluate the feasibility of implementing a structured digital patient-reported assessment pathway in adults aged 65 years or older with acute leukemia. Following activation of the institutional MiAsturSalud/SESPA platform, participants will complete the EORTC QLQ-C30 and FACT-Leu remotely after the baseline visit and will repeat the digital assessment at 3-6 months. The primary outcome will be completion of at least 80% of the baseline digital assessment within 7 days. Secondary outcomes will be caregiver assistance requirement, non-completion of the planned digital follow-up assessment, and elapsed completion time. The study is not designed to establish clinical efficacy.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
20

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

  • Spain
    • Principality of Asturias
      • Oviedo, Principality of Asturias, Spain, 33011
        • Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias (HUCA)

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 65 years or older.
  • Confirmed diagnosis of acute leukemia of myeloid or lymphoid origin.
  • Active ambulatory follow-up in the Hematology Service at Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias.
  • Ability to understand the questionnaires and provide their own responses, independently or with practical assistance from a caregiver.
  • Access to a compatible internet-enabled digital device, either personally or through a caregiver.
  • Provision of written informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Cognitive impairment that, in the treating hematologist's clinical judgment, prevents the participant from understanding the questionnaires or providing their own responses, despite permitted practical assistance from a caregiver.
  • Clinical condition that, in the treating hematologist's judgment, precludes completion of the study procedures.
  • Persistent inability to access or use the MiAsturSalud/SESPA platform despite reasonable technical support.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Digital Patient-Reported Assessment Pathway
Other: Digital Patient-Reported Assessment Pathway
Following activation of the MiAsturSalud/SESPA digital pathway, participants will complete the EORTC QLQ-C30 and FACT-Leu remotely after the baseline visit. The baseline digital assessment will be scheduled within 48-72 hours, with an outcome assessment window extending to 7 days. A second digital assessment will be scheduled at 3-6 months. The platform will record questionnaire completion status and elapsed completion time, and caregiver assistance will be documented. The pathway will not generate automated clinical alerts or mandate changes to treatment.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Feasibility of Digital Implementation
Time Frame: Within 7 days after baseline.
Proportion of participants completing at least 80% of all required items across the EORTC QLQ-C30 and FACT-Leu baseline digital questionnaire battery.
Within 7 days after baseline.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Caregiver Assistance Requirement
Time Frame: Within 7 days after baseline.
Proportion of participants requiring practical caregiver assistance to access or navigate the platform, read questionnaire content or enter responses selected by the participant. Independent proxy completion will not be permitted.
Within 7 days after baseline.
Non-completion of Planned Digital Follow-up Assessment
Time Frame: From baseline to 3-6 months.
Proportion of participants who do not complete the planned digital follow-up assessment at 3-6 months. Reasons for non-completion will be categorised where ascertainable, including voluntary withdrawal, technical difficulties, clinical deterioration, disease progression, hospitalisation, death and loss to follow-up.
From baseline to 3-6 months.
Time Required for Digital Completion
Time Frame: Within 7 days after baseline.
Elapsed time, in minutes, required to complete the baseline digital questionnaires.
Within 7 days after baseline.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Fundación para la Investigación Biosanitaria del Principado de Asturias

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
December 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
June 1, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
May 13, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 13, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
May 19, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
August 6, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 4, 2026

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
August 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 2025.519

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

De-identified individual participant data underlying results reported in publications arising from this study, together with the corresponding data dictionary and statistical analysis code, will be available from the principal investigators upon reasonable request. Access will be subject to a methodologically sound proposal, institutional governance review, an appropriate data-use agreement and applicable ethics and data-protection requirements. Owing to the small sample size and risk of re-identification, participant-level data will not be deposited in an openly accessible public repository.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Beginning 6 months after publication of the principal study results and ending 5 years thereafter.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Requests must include a methodologically sound research proposal and will be subject to approval by the principal investigators and relevant institutional governance bodies. Access will require an appropriate data-use agreement and compliance with applicable ethics and data-protection requirements

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • ANALYTIC_CODE

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings