TCM Formula vs. HMB in Pre-Frail Elders: Muscle Strength and Bone Status (TCM-HMB-PF)

May 13, 2026 updated by: Jui-Shan Lin, MD, Tri-Service General Hospital

Effects of Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) Formula vs. HMB on Muscle Strength and Bone Status in Pre-Frail Elders: A Comparative Study

The purpose of this study is to compare the effects of a standardized Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) formula versus beta-hydroxy-beta-methylbutyrate (HMB) on muscle strength and bone health in pre-frail older adults . Pre-frailty is a critical stage where functional decline may still be reversed through proper intervention. The study will enroll 90 participants aged 65 years or older who meet the criteria for pre-frailty. Participants will be randomly assigned to either the TCM group (receiving a standardized herbal powder formula) or the HMB group (receiving nutritional supplement tablets) for 24 weeks . The primary objective is to evaluate the change in handgrip strength from baseline to Week 12 . Researchers will also assess changes in skeletal muscle mass, bone mineral density, and overall physical performance . The goal is to determine if the TCM formula is an effective alternative or complementary intervention for managing geriatric frailty.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

This is a randomized, open-label, parallel-group comparative study designed to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of a standardized Traditional Chinese Medicine formula versus beta-hydroxy-beta-methylbutyrate supplementation in pre-frail older adults . Pre-frailty is identified as a reversible stage between robust health and frailty. This study aims to provide clinical evidence for the Traditional Chinese Medicine formula as an intervention to improve muscle strength, bone health, and physical function. Eligible participants aged 65 years or older who meet 1 to 2 of the 5 Fried frailty phenotype criteria will be randomized in a 1 to 1 ratio. The total study duration for each participant is approximately 26 weeks, including a screening period and a 24-week intervention period. Participants in the Traditional Chinese Medicine group receive a standardized herbal powder formula designed to tonify Qi, Blood, Liver, and Kidney. The total daily dosage is 18 grams, administered as 9 grams twice daily, taken 30 minutes before breakfast and lunch. Participants in the HMB group receive a total daily dose of 3 grams of beta-hydroxy-beta-methylbutyrate, administered as two 0.75-gram tablets twice daily after breakfast and lunch. The primary endpoint is the change from baseline in handgrip strength at Week 12 . Secondary endpoints assessed at Week 12 and Week 24 include changes in skeletal muscle mass, bone mineral density, body fat percentage, gait speed using a 6-meter test, Timed Up and Go test, Five Times Sit-to-Stand test, Fried frailty phenotype status, Clinical Frailty Scale scores, and SF-12 quality of life scores . Safety is monitored throughout the study by assessing adverse events and changes in laboratory parameters, including complete blood count, liver and renal function, and urinalysis . A total of 90 participants (45 per group) is required based on a non-inferiority t-test for the primary endpoint. The calculation assumed a power of 80 percent and a one-sided significance level of 0.025, accounting for an estimated 20 percent dropout rate.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
90

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

  • Taiwan
      • Taipei, Taiwan, 114202
        • Recruiting
        • Tri-Service General Hospital
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Jui-Shan Lin, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Li-Wei Wu, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Sui-Lung Su, Prof.
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Wen-Hui Fang, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Yaw-Wen Chang, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Tung-Wei Kao, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Hung-Yi Chen, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Yan-Ru Wang, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Yu-Heng Wang, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Po-Han Lin, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Tao-Chun Peng, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Ting-Ching Chen, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Wan-Ting Soong, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Yu-Ting Cheng, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Yi-Ru Lei, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male or female participants aged 65 years or older at the time of screening.
  • Body Mass Index less than 30 kilograms per square meter.
  • Identified as pre-frail according to the Fried frailty phenotype, meeting 1 to 2 of the following 5 criteria: 1) Hand grip strength below specific thresholds based on gender and Body Mass Index. For males, Body Mass Index 24 or less is 29 kilograms or less, Body Mass Index 24.1 to 28 is 30 kilograms or less, Body Mass Index greater than 28 is 32 kilograms or less. For females, Body Mass Index 23 or less is 17 kilograms or less, Body Mass Index 23.1 to 26 is 17.3 kilograms or less, Body Mass Index 26.1 to 29 is 18 kilograms or less, Body Mass Index greater than 29 is 21 kilograms or less. 2) Slow walking speed. For a 4-meter distance, walking time of 7 seconds or more for males 173 centimeters or shorter, or 6 seconds or more for males taller than 173 centimeters. For females 159 centimeters or shorter, 7 seconds or more, or 6 seconds or more for females taller than 159 centimeters. 3) Self-reported exhaustion. Answering 3 days or more per week to either feeling that everything was an effort or could not get going in the past week. 4) Unintentional weight loss. Loss of 3 kilograms or more or more than 5 percent of body weight in the past year. 5) Low physical activity. Weekly energy expenditure less than 383 kilocalories for males or less than 270 kilocalories for females.
  • Ability to safely complete a 6-meter walk test in a single attempt without assistance or using only simple aids such as a cane.
  • Clinically stable condition allowing for follow-up visits every 4 weeks and participation in all study-related assessments.
  • Willingness to provide existing test data from within 90 days prior to randomization, including Bone Mineral Density by DXA and serum biochemistry or urinalysis results.
  • Sufficient cognitive function to understand the study and sign the informed consent form, or with the assistance of a legal representative.
  • Willingness to maintain existing diet and exercise habits during the study and not start high-intensity exercise programs or large amounts of nutritional supplements.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Major acute illness such as acute myocardial infarction, pneumonia, or acute stroke within 2 weeks prior to screening.
  • Major organ dysfunction, including renal function with estimated glomerular filtration rate less than 45 milliliters per minute per 1.73 square meters within 1 month prior to screening, liver function with AST or ALT greater than 3 times the upper limit of normal within 1 month prior to screening, NYHA Class III or IV heart failure, or severe COPD requiring long-term oxygen therapy.
  • Unplanned hospitalization within 1 month prior to screening, or major surgery with incomplete functional recovery within 3 months prior to screening.
  • Current malignant tumor under treatment, or less than 12 months since the completion of cancer treatment.
  • Use of supplements containing the same ingredients as the study interventions, or products that may affect the primary endpoint including HMB, creatine, branched-chain amino acids, or high-dose protein powder within 4 weeks prior to screening.
  • Known significant clinical allergy or hypersensitivity to any components of the study formula or HMB nutritional supplement.
  • Moderate to severe dementia, severe depression, or other psychiatric disorders resulting in inability to cooperate without a legal representative.
  • Participation in other interventional clinical trials involving drugs, biologics, or nutritional supplements within 3 months prior to screening.
  • New initiation or dose adjustment of medications affecting muscle or bone metabolism within 3 months prior to screening, including systemic glucocorticoids, anabolic steroids, testosterone, or growth hormones.
  • Any other condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, makes the participant unsuitable for the study due to safety or compliance concerns.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Experimental: TCM Group
Participants will receive a standardized Traditional Chinese Medicine herbal powder formula. This formula is designed to tonify Qi, Blood, Liver, and Kidney to enhance physical function in elders. The daily dosage is 18 grams, administered as one 9-gram sachet twice daily. It is taken 30 minutes before breakfast and lunch for 24 consecutive weeks.
Drug: TCM Formula
A scientific TCM herbal powder formula prepared by the hospital pharmacy. The formula consists of 10 botanical ingredients focused on tonifying Qi, Blood, Liver, and Kidney. Participants will receive a total daily dose of 18 grams, administered as 9 grams twice daily (BID), 30 minutes before breakfast and lunch.
Other Names:
  • TCM
Active Comparator: Active Comparator: HMB Group
Participants will receive beta-hydroxy-beta-methylbutyrate (HMB) as an active control. The intervention consists of a total daily dose of 3 grams, administered as two 0.75-gram tablets twice daily. The tablets are to be taken after breakfast and lunch for 24 consecutive weeks.
Dietary supplement: HMB (beta-Hydroxy-beta-methylbutyrate)
The active ingredient is beta-hydroxy-beta-methylbutyrate (HMB), provided in 0.75g tablets. Participants will take 2 tablets twice daily (BID) after breakfast and lunch, resulting in a total daily dose of 3 grams. This is a common clinical dose used as a nutritional intervention for muscle strength and physical performance.
Other Names:
  • HMB

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from Baseline in Hand Grip Strength at Week 12
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 12
Hand grip strength is used as a functional biomarker to reflect overall muscle strength. Measurement will be performed using a standardized JAMAR dynamometer. Participants will follow a standardized procedure: seated position, elbow flexed at 90 degrees, with the forearm in a neutral position using the dominant hand. The "Change" is calculated as the value at Week 12 minus the baseline value . Higher values indicate improved muscle strength.
Baseline and Week 12

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Hand Grip Strength at Week 24
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 24.
Change from baseline in hand grip strength at Week 24. Measurement is performed using a standardized JAMAR dynamometer with the dominant hand. Higher values indicate better muscle strength.
Baseline and Week 24.
Change in Skeletal Muscle Mass
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 12, and Week 24.
Change from baseline in skeletal muscle mass measured by Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis (BIA). This reflects structural changes in muscle quantity.
Baseline, Week 12, and Week 24.
Change in Calf Circumference
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 12, and Week 24.
Change from baseline in calf circumference measured at the widest part of the calf using a soft tape. It serves as a proxy indicator for lower limb muscle mass.
Baseline, Week 12, and Week 24.
Change in Gait Speed
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 12, and Week 24.
Change from baseline in gait speed using the 6-meter gait speed test. Participants walk at a normal pace, and the time taken is recorded to reflect functional mobility.
Baseline, Week 12, and Week 24.
Change in Timed Up and Go (TUG) Test Time
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 12, and Week 24.
Change from baseline in the time required to rise from a chair, walk 3 meters, turn, return, and sit down again. This test evaluates dynamic balance and agility.
Baseline, Week 12, and Week 24.
Change in Five Times Sit-to-Stand (5xSTS) Test Time
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 12, and Week 24.
Change from baseline in the time taken to complete five consecutive sit-to-stand cycles as quickly as possible. This reflects lower limb muscle power and endurance.
Baseline, Week 12, and Week 24.
Change in Fried Frailty Phenotype Status
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 12, and Week 24.
Change from baseline in frailty status categorized as Robust (0 criteria), Pre-frail (1-2 criteria), or Frail (3-5 criteria) based on 5 indicators: grip strength, walking speed, exhaustion, weight loss, and physical activity.
Baseline, Week 12, and Week 24.
Change in Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) Score
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 12, and Week 24.
Change from baseline in the Clinical Frailty Scale score, which ranges from 1 (Very Fit) to 9 (Terminally Ill). It provides a holistic clinical assessment of frailty level.
Baseline, Week 12, and Week 24.
Change in Bone Mineral Density (BMD)
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 12, and Week 24.
Change from baseline in bone mineral density measured by Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA, Lunar iDXA).
Baseline, Week 12, and Week 24.
Change in Body Fat Percentage
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 12, and Week 24.
Change from baseline in body fat percentage analyzed using DXA (Lunar iDXA). This reflects changes in body composition related to metabolic health.
Baseline, Week 12, and Week 24.
Change in SF-12 Quality of Life Score
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 12, and Week 24.
Change from baseline in the 12-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12) scores. Higher scores represent better health-related quality of life.
Baseline, Week 12, and Week 24.

Other Outcome Measures

Other Outcome Measures

For clinical trials, a planned measurement described in the protocol that is used to determine the effect of an intervention/treatment on participants. For observational studies, a measurement or observation that is used to describe patterns of diseases or traits, or associations with exposures, risk factors, or treatment. Types of outcome measures include primary outcome measure and secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Incidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (Safety)
Time Frame: Baseline up to Week 24.
Number of participants with treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) . AEs will be assessed for severity (mild, moderate, or severe) and their causal relationship to the study interventions (TCM formula or HMB supplement).
Baseline up to Week 24.
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities
Time Frame: Baseline up to Week 24
Number of participants with laboratory values that are outside the reference range and judged by the investigator to be clinically significant. Laboratory assessments include: Complete Blood Count (CBC); Liver function (ALT, AST, Albumin); Renal function (BUN, Creatinine, eGFR, Uric acid); Electrolytes (Na, K, Ca, Mg); Fasting blood glucose; and General Urinalysis (protein, glucose, urobilinogen, bilirubin, sediment, specific gravity, pH, occult blood) .
Baseline up to Week 24

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Tri-Service General Hospital

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
National Research Institute of Chinese Medicine, Ministry of Health and Welfare

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Jui-Shan Lin, MD, Tri-Service General Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
April 2, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
October 31, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 31, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
May 5, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 13, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
May 19, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
May 19, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 13, 2026

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
May 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • MBS-101
  • 115-1-N001 (Other Grant/Funding Number: NRICM, MOHW)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Individual participant data collected during the trial will not be shared with the general public. According to the study protocol, all research data and intellectual property are jointly owned by the National Research Institute of Chinese Medicine and Tri-Service General Hospital. To protect participant privacy and maintain strict confidentiality, access to de-identified participant data is limited to the principal investigator and authorized research team members. Direct access to original records is permitted only for the trial sponsor, the Institutional Review Board, and regulatory authorities for the purposes of monitoring and auditing to ensure compliance with Good Clinical Practice and relevant data protection laws. There is currently no plan to make the individual participant data available to external researchers or the public to maintain the highest standards of participant confidentiality and protect the research interests of the participating institutions.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Sarcopenia

Clinical Trials on TCM Formula

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings