Performance of Diffusion-weighted Imaging-based Virtual MR Elastography (vMRE) for Diagnosing Breast Cancer
Performance of Diffusion-weighted Imaging-based Virtual MR Elastography (vMRE) for Diagnosing Breast Cancer: A Prospective Study
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Yunnan
-
Kunming, Yunnan, China
- Yunnan Cancer Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Aged 18 years or older
- Female patients with breast lesions BI-RADS category 4 and above on mammography or ultrasound
- Breast MRE and vMRE examinations should be performed within 2 weeks prior to needle biopsy or surgery
- Obtaining definitive pathology via needle biopsy or postoperatively
Exclusion Criteria:
- Pregnant and lactating women
- Previous history of breast treatment (e.g., surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, or targeted therapy, etc.)
- Inability to cooperate for MRI examination, or presence of severe artifacts (e.g., motion artifacts, metal artifacts) in the imaging data that precludes parameter measurement.
- The lesion cannot be clearly identified or delineated on MRE or vMRE images
- Complicated by severe cardiac, hepatic, or renal diseases, coagulation disorders, or other malignancies.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Performance of Diffusion-weighted Imaging-based Virtual MR Elastography (vMRE) for Diagnosing Breast
This study aims to prospectively collect breast MRE and vMRE image data, clinical data, and pathological data from female patients due to breast lesions indicated by mammography or ultrasound with BI-RADS category 4 or above.
It evaluates the consistency of MRE and vMRE in measuring breast lesions and compares the diagnostic performance of the two methods in distinguishing between benign and malignant breast conditions, with the goal of determining whether vMRE has the potential to replace or supplement MRE.
Furthermore, it explores and compares the correlation and diagnostic efficacy of sADC and virtual shear modulus calculated at different b-values with the true shear modulus, aiming to identify and optimize the optimal imaging protocol suitable for breast imaging.
It also investigates the correlation between quantitative parameters of vMRE and MRE and pathological results such as patient pathological grading and molecular typing, providing imaging evidence for individualized precis
|
Breast MRI scan outside of standard treatment options
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Differentiation between benign and malignant lesions
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of surgery
|
With puncture biopsy or surgical pathology serving as the gold standard, MRI parameters are used to distinguish benign from malignant lesions
|
From enrollment to the end of surgery
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Pathological TNM staging
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of surgery
|
Pathological examination information: The pathology results using surgery/biopsy data are the gold standard, and the depth of tumor invasion, lymph node metastasis, and distant metastasis are recorded
|
From enrollment to the end of surgery
|
|
Consistency Between MRE and vMRE in Lesion Measurement and Comparison of Diagnostic Performance
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of surgery
|
Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC); Bland-Altman analysis etc.
|
From enrollment to the end of surgery
|
|
Correlation of b-value-derived sADC and Virtual Shear Modulus with Reference Parameters, and Optimization of Imaging Protocol
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of surgery
|
Pearson or Spearman correlation coefficient (between sADC and true real ADC),AUC, sensitivity, specificity, accuracy for each b-value combination,Optimal b-value combination (based on maximal AUC or highest correlation coefficient)
|
From enrollment to the end of surgery
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Study Director: Lianhua Ye, Ethics Committee of Yunnan Provincial Cancer Hospital
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- KYLX2025-329
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.