EYEMAX® Versus SPYGLASS™ DS for Biliary Stricture Diagnosis (EYE/SPY)

May 26, 2026 updated by: David KARSENTI

Multicenter Study on the Quality of Biliary Biopsies: EYEMAX® vs SPYGLASS™ DS

Cholangiocarcinoma remains difficult to diagnose because of the limited sensitivity of currently available endobiliary sampling techniques. Cholangioscopy-guided biopsies performed with the SPYGLASS™ DS system have improved tissue acquisition compared with conventional brushing techniques, but diagnostic sensitivity remains suboptimal, partly because of the small diameter of the dedicated biopsy forceps.

The EYEMAX® cholangioscopy system has a larger working channel, potentially allowing the use of larger biopsy forceps and improved tissue acquisition. This multicenter randomized study aims to compare the diagnostic performance of EYEMAX® versus SPYGLASS™ DS for the diagnosis of malignant biliary strictures.

The primary objective is to compare the positive diagnostic yield of the first four cholangioscopy-guided biopsies obtained with each system in patients with adenocarcinomatous biliary strictures.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
120

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 1. Adult patients aged 18 to 84 years
  • 2. Patients requiring ERCP with cholangioscopy-guided biopsy for biliary stricture
  • 3. Absence of a mass easily accessible to EUS-guided fine needle aspiration
  • 4. ASA physical status 1-3
  • 5. No participation in another clinical trial
  • 6. Written informed consent obtained
  • 7. Patient affiliated with a social security system or equivalent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • 1. Lithiasic biliary obstruction
  • 2. Patients younger than 18 years
  • 3. ASA 4 or ASA 5 patients
  • 4. Pregnant or breastfeeding women
  • 5. Coagulation disorders preventing biopsy procedures
  • 6. Surgical anatomy preventing papillary access
  • 7. Patients unable to provide informed consent
  • 8. Upper gastrointestinal obstruction
  • 9. Intolerance to endoscopy
  • 10. Severe cardiopulmonary disease
  • 11. Acute pancreatitis or severe cholangitis
  • 12. Severe contrast agent allergy
  • 13. Patients under legal protection measures

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Cholangioscopy-guided biliary biopsies performed using the EYEMAX® cholangioscope (Micro-Tech).
Device: EYEMAX® cholangioscopy system
Cholangioscopy-guided biliary biopsies performed using the EYEMAX® cholangioscope (Micro-Tech) during ERCP under general anesthesia. Following biliary cannulation and guidewire passage across the stricture, two series of four targeted biopsies are obtained using the dedicated biopsy forceps through the EYEMAX® working channel. Additional diagnostic sampling procedures, including biliary brushing, fluoroscopy-guided biopsies, bile aspiration cytology, and EUS-guided sampling when clinically indicated, may also be performed according to local practice.
Active Comparator: Cholangioscopy-guided biliary biopsies performed using the SPYGLASS™ DS system (Boston Scientific).
Device: SPYGLASS™ DS system
Cholangioscopy-guided biliary biopsies performed using the SPYGLASS™ DS cholangioscopy system (Boston Scientific) during ERCP under general anesthesia. Following biliary cannulation and guidewire passage across the stricture, two series of four targeted biopsies are obtained using the dedicated biopsy forceps through the SPYGLASS™ DS working channel. Additional diagnostic sampling procedures, including biliary brushing, fluoroscopy-guided biopsies, bile aspiration cytology, and EUS-guided sampling when clinically indicated, may also be performed according to local practice.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of positive pathological diagnoses obtained from the first four cholangioscopy-guided biopsies
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
The positive diagnostic yield will be assessed for the first four biopsies obtained under cholangioscopy in patients with adenocarcinomatous biliary strictures. This rate will be defined as the ratio between the number of positive pathological diagnoses obtained from the first four cholangioscopy-guided biopsies and the total number of confirmed adenocarcinomatous biliary strictures.
Through study completion, an average of 1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Positive diagnostic yield of all eight cholangioscopy-guided biopsies
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
This rate will be defined as the proportion of positive pathological diagnoses obtained from all eight cholangioscopy-guided biopsies among all confirmed adenocarcinomatous biliary strictures.
Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Histological cellularity classification of cholangioscopy-guided biopsy specimens
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Biopsy specimen cellularity will be assessed by expert gastrointestinal pathologists and classified into four predefined categories: acellular, low abundance, satisfactory abundance, or rich abundance.
Through study completion, an average of 1 year
False negative rate of cholangioscopy-guided biopsies
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
The false negative rate will be defined as the proportion of patients with negative biopsy results despite a final diagnosis of adenocarcinomatous biliary stricture confirmed during follow-up.
Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Negative predictive value of cholangioscopy-guided biopsies
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Negative predictive value will be calculated as the proportion of patients with negative biopsy results who do not have adenocarcinomatous biliary strictures at final diagnosis.
Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Percentage of technical failures during cholangioscopy-guided biopsy procedures
Time Frame: Periprocedural
Technical failure will be defined as the inability to access the biliary stricture with the cholangioscope or the inability to obtain biopsy material using the dedicated biopsy forceps.
Periprocedural
Diagnostic yield of additional biliary sampling techniques
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
The diagnostic yield of additional biliary sampling techniques, including biliary brushing, fluoroscopy-guided biopsies, bile aspiration cytology, and EUS-guided sampling, will be evaluated as the proportion of positive pathological diagnoses obtained using each technique.
Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Number of participants with procedure-related adverse events
Time Frame: Up to Day 30
Procedure-related adverse events include abdominal pain, acute pancreatitis, cholangitis, cholecystitis, hepatic abscess, perforation, bleeding, and death.
Up to Day 30
Mean duration of cholangioscopy-guided biopsy procedures
Time Frame: Periprocedural
The duration required to complete the eight cholangioscopy-guided biopsies will be measured and compared between the two cholangioscopy systems.
Periprocedural

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
David KARSENTI

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
September 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
September 1, 2029

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
September 1, 2030

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
May 19, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 26, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
June 2, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
June 2, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 26, 2026

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
May 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • SFED-160

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings