Rehabilitation Assessment of Motor Function In Cerebral Palsy Using Explainable AI
Rehabilitation Assessment of Motor Function in Ambulatory Children With Cerebral Palsy Using Explainable Machine Learning
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Enrollment
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Qamar Mehmood, Phd Rehab
- Phone Number: 03335151063
- Email: qamar.mehmood@riphah.edu.pk
Study Locations
-
-
-
Islamabad, Pakistan
- Alfarabi special education center
-
Contact:
- Sidra Ghias, PhD*
- Phone Number: 03224356227
- Email: sidrahasan1989@gmail.com
-
Contact:
- Email: sidrahasan1989@gmail.com
-
Principal Investigator:
- Sidra Ghias, PhD*
-
Islamabad, Pakistan
- Army special education Academy
-
Islamabad, Pakistan
- National institute of Rehabilitation medicine
-
Contact:
- Sidra Ghias, PhD*
- Phone Number: 03224356227
- Email: sidrahasan1989@gmail.com
-
Contact:
- Email: sidrahasan1989@gmail.com
-
Principal Investigator:
- Sidra Ghias, PhD*
-
Karachi, Pakistan
- Karachi institue of neurological diseases and rehabilitation(KIND-R)
-
Contact:
- Email: sidrahasan1989@gmail.com
-
Principal Investigator:
- Sidra Ghias, PhD*
-
Contact:
- Sidra Ghias, PhD*
- Phone Number: 03314140498
- Email: sidrahasan1989@gmail.com
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Child
- Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age 4 to18 years
- Diagnosed any motor type of cerebral palsy (spastic, dyskinetic, ataxic, mixed),)
- GMFCS levels I -III (able to walk with or without an assistive device).
- All participants must be able to ambulate at least 10 meters with or without an assistive device.
- Capable of following simple verbal instructions.
- Parental informed consent and child assent
Exclusion Criteria:
- Recent orthopedic or neurosurgical interventions (<6 months).
- Uncontrolled seizures affecting gait.
- Non-ambulatory (GMFCS IV-V) or cognitive impairments preventing cooperation.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
Number of groups / cohorts
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / CohortGroup / Cohort |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Ambulatory Children with Spastic Cerebral Palsy (GMFCS I-III)
Children diagnosed with spastic cerebral palsy who are ambulatory and classified within Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) Levels I to III.
Participants will undergo clinical, functional, and gait assessments for AI-based prediction of functional mobility and gait outcomes
|
Participants will continue receiving their standard/routine physiotherapy rehabilitation program as prescribed by their treating therapist.
The study will involve observational collection of clinical, functional, and gait-related data using standardized assessment tools, and AI-based video analysis.
No additional therapeutic intervention will be administered specifically for research purposes.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Edinburgh visual gait scale (EVGS)
Time Frame: Baseline to 6 Months
|
Edinburgh visual gait scale (EVGS) EVGS can be a supportive tool that adds quantitative data instead of only qualitative assessment to a video only gait evaluation.
Interobserver agreement is 60-90% and Kappa values are 0.18-0.85
for the 17 items in EVGS.
Reliability is higher for distal segments (foot/ankle/knee 63-90%; trunk/pelvis/hip 60-76%).
Agreement between EVGS and 3DGA is 52-73%.
|
Baseline to 6 Months
|
|
WeeFIM (Functional Independence Measure for Children)
Time Frame: Baseline to 6 months
|
WeeFIM (Functional Independence Measure for Children) Reliability: High internal consistency and ICCs (motor and cognitive scales) ~0.91-0.98 in children with cerebral palsy Validity: Construct and external validity supported (scale fits Rasch model expectations and correlates with related developmental measures)
|
Baseline to 6 months
|
|
GMFM-88
Time Frame: Baseline to 6 months followup
|
GMFM (Gross Motor Function Measure) Reliability: Excellent.
Internal consistency Cronbach's α ~0.997-1.00;
intra- and inter-rater ICC ~0.994-0.999
(both GMFM-88 & GMFM-66) Validity: Construct and concurrent validity supported by strong correlations with related motor function classifications (e.g., GMFCS, PEDI mobility)
|
Baseline to 6 months followup
|
|
Markerless Gait Analysis
Time Frame: Baseline to 6 months
|
Gait videos will be processed using a validated markerless pose estimation framework . Spatiotemporal and kinematic gait parameters will be extracted, including but not limited to:
|
Baseline to 6 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Feasibility of markerless video-based gait analysis for routine physiotherapy assessment in low-resource clinical settings
Time Frame: Through study completion, 12 month
|
Feasibility will be evaluated using: (1) video acquisition success rate; (2) data processing completion rate; (3) time required for analysis; and (4) clinician usability and interpretability feedback, obtained through structured questionnaires and semi-structured interviews with practicing physiotherapists regarding SHAP-based model outputs.
|
Through study completion, 12 month
|
|
Predictive accuracy of the machine learning model for gait and motor function
Time Frame: At model validation ,post data collection ,6 month
|
Model performance will be evaluated using RMSE, MAE, and R² for continuous outcomes.
Explainability will be assessed using SHAP values, with examination of feature importance consistency across cross-validation folds.
based on gait and motor function data collected from participants with ambulatory cerebral palsy.
|
At model validation ,post data collection ,6 month
|
|
Robustness of model predictive performance and change in functional and gait outcomes across heterogeneous therapy exposure contexts
Time Frame: Baseline to 6-month follow-up
|
The Phase 2 trained model will be applied to 6-month follow-up data without retraining.
Predictive performance (RMSE, MAE, R²) will be compared across therapy exposure subgroups (regular vs. irregular/no physiotherapy).
Temporal prognosis will additionally be characterized using change from baseline in GMFM-66, WeeFIM, and EVGS, alongside gait symmetry indices derived from video analysis.
|
Baseline to 6-month follow-up
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Sidra Ghias, PhD* Rehab, Riphah International university Isalambad
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Estimated)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- RCRAHS-ISB/REC/PhD/011111
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.