Comparing the Effectiveness of Tensioner Vs Slider Neurodynamic Techniques in Patients With Sciatica
Comparing the Effectiveness of Tensioner Vs Slider Neurodynamic Techniques in Patients With Sciatica: A Randomised Control Trial
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Due to the increasing prevalence of sciatica and evidence based treatment options using physiotherapy that offers effective alleviation of pain and rehabilitation of function. Neurodynamic mobilization focuses on addressing neurological problems; thus, there is a need to know about the effectiveness of the different types of the technique being used.
The current research is expected to contribute to the existing literature in the area of physiotherapy concerning the identification of the most effective neurodynamic technique in the case of sciatica. These findings could be helpful for medical practitioners during their work, making decisions and planning treatment. At the same time, the results of the investigation may become the basis for further research.
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Sidra Hanif, DPT, MSNMPT, PhD PT
- Phone Number: +923335985631
- Email: sidra.hanif@uipt.iiui.edu.pk
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Sojla Bashir, DPT, MSPT MSK
- Phone Number: +923008580082
- Email: sojlabashir@gmail.com
Study Locations
-
-
Punjab Province
-
Rawalpindi, Punjab Province, Pakistan
- Recruiting
- Ibadat International Hospital
-
Contact:
- Sojla Bashir, DPT, MSPT MSK
- Phone Number: +923008580082
- Email: sojlabashir@gmail.com
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients with radicular pain persisting for 12 weeks to 1 year, with no acute episode in the last 4 weeks
- Unilateral symptoms radiating below the buttock to thigh, knee, or lower leg
- Positive Slump Test
- Positive Straight Leg Raise (SLR) test above 45°
- Functional limitation during activities such as walking or lifting
Exclusion Criteria:
- BMI < 20 kg/m² or > 30 kg/m²
- Previous history of spinal surgery
- Presence of red flags (significant motor/sensory loss, altered reflexes, or bowel/bladder dysfunction)
- Peripheral neuropathy
- History of vertebral fracture or significant spinal/limb trauma
- Systemic diseases (e.g., diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular, or renal disease)
- Progressive neurological deficits (motor weakness, sensory loss, reflex changes)
- Pregnancy
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Slider Neurodynamic Technique Group
Participants will receive slider neurodynamic mobilization techniques along with conventional physiotherapy management.
|
will receive slider neurodynamic mobilization techniques along with conventional physiotherapy management.
|
|
Active Comparator: Tensioner Neurodynamic Technique Group
Participants will receive tensioner neurodynamic mobilization techniques along with conventional physiotherapy management.
|
will receive tensioner neurodynamic mobilization techniques along with conventional physiotherapy management.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Pain intensity
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 8
|
will be measured using VAS
|
Baseline to Week 8
|
|
Functional disability
Time Frame: Baseline to week 8
|
measured using Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)
|
Baseline to week 8
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Hip range of motion
Time Frame: Baseline to week 8
|
assessed using Goniometer
|
Baseline to week 8
|
|
Lumbar flexion Range of Motion
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 8
|
measured using Modified-Modified Schober Test (MMST)
|
Baseline to Week 8
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Estimated)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- IIUI/RERC/ADT/2026/01/211
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.