Volume Removal Intolerance During Net Ultrafiltration in Acute Kidney Injury Patients (VINKO)

June 9, 2026 updated by: Gonzalo Ramirez Guerrero, Hospital Las Higueras

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is common in critically ill patients and is frequently associated with fluid overload, which can worsen clinical outcomes. Continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) allows fluid removal through net ultrafiltration (UFNET), but some patients develop hemodynamic instability or signs of poor tissue perfusion during this process.

The purpose of this prospective observational study is to evaluate tolerance to net ultrafiltration in critically ill patients with AKI receiving CRRT. The study will assess clinical, hemodynamic, ultrasound, perfusion, and biochemical parameters before and during fluid removal to identify factors associated with ultrafiltration intolerance.

The investigators hypothesize that alterations in hemodynamic, perfusion, and congestion-related parameters can identify patients at increased risk of ultrafiltration intolerance before the development of overt hypotension. The results may help improve individualized fluid removal strategies and optimize the safety of CRRT in critically ill patients.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Detailed Description

Fluid overload is a frequent and clinically relevant complication in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury (AKI). In this setting, continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) is frequently used not only for solute control but also as a strategy for controlled fluid removal through net ultrafiltration (UFNET). Although UFNET is central to de-resuscitation, the individual tolerance to fluid removal is highly variable and is not fully captured by blood pressure monitoring alone.

The concept of ultrafiltration intolerance remains poorly standardized. In clinical practice, intolerance is often recognized only after overt hemodynamic instability occurs, such as hypotension, escalation of vasoactive support, or interruption of fluid removal. However, reductions in cardiac output, impaired tissue perfusion, or worsening venous congestion may precede overt hypotension. Therefore, a multiparametric assessment may allow earlier identification of patients at risk.

This is a prospective, observational, analytical study in critically ill adult patients with AKI receiving CRRT with prescribed UFNET. The study does not assign or modify therapeutic interventions. CRRT modality, anticoagulation strategy, UFNET prescription, vasopressor management, fluid administration, and all other clinical decisions will remain under the responsibility of the treating clinical team according to routine care.

The study will characterize the physiological response to UFNET using a structured multiparametric monitoring approach. Recorded domains will include conventional macrohemodynamic variables, vasoactive support, selected advanced hemodynamic variables when available, focused cardiac ultrasound, venous congestion assessment, peripheral perfusion parameters, fluid balance variables, and selected biochemical markers. Functional hemodynamic maneuvers may be performed when feasible and clinically safe.

Data will be collected prospectively using a standardized case report form. Variables will be recorded at predefined time points before and during the early phase of UFNET, with additional off-schedule recordings if clinical signs compatible with intolerance occur. Source data will be obtained from the electronic or paper medical record, bedside monitoring systems, CRRT prescription and treatment records, laboratory results, and ultrasound assessments performed as part of clinical evaluation.

A data dictionary will define each variable, including its source, units, coding, and expected physiological range when applicable. Data quality procedures will include review of completeness, range checks, consistency checks between related variables, and verification of clinically implausible values against source records. The research team will periodically review entered data to identify missing, inconsistent, or out-of-range values.

Data will be anonymized before analysis. No directly identifiable patient information will be stored in the final analytical database. Access to the study database will be restricted to authorized study investigators. Data will be stored using password-protected institutional or investigator-controlled systems according to local confidentiality and ethical requirements.

The planned sample size is 128 participants, including an estimated analytical sample of 116 participants and an approximate 10% over-recruitment to account for incomplete data, missing assessments, or inability to definitively adjudicate the outcome. The sample size was based on an analytical case-control approach aimed at identifying factors associated with ultrafiltration intolerance.

Missing data will be evaluated before statistical analysis. Variables with substantial missingness may be excluded from inferential analyses. For variables with acceptable levels of missingness, available-case analysis will be performed. The extent and pattern of missing data will be reported.

Statistical analysis will include descriptive statistics, comparison between patients who develop ultrafiltration intolerance and those who do not, and exploratory modeling to identify factors independently associated with intolerance. Continuous variables will be summarized using median and interquartile range or mean and standard deviation, as appropriate. Categorical variables will be summarized as frequencies and percentages. Group comparisons will be performed using appropriate parametric or non-parametric tests according to data distribution. Multivariable logistic regression may be used to explore independent predictors, with covariate selection based on clinical relevance and number of events.

The overall objective of this study is to improve the characterization of ultrafiltration intolerance during CRRT and to generate evidence that may support individualized, physiology-guided fluid removal strategies in critically ill patients with AKI.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
128

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

  • Brazil
      • Salvador, Brazil
  • Chile
      • Concepción, Chile
        • Hospital Clínico Regional de Concepción
        • Contact:
      • Los Ángeles, Chile
      • Santiago, Chile
        • Hospital Clínico Dra. Eloísa Díaz Insunza de La Florida
        • Contact:
      • Talcahuano, Chile
        • Hospital Las Higueras de Talcahuano
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Rodrigo Ulloa, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Jonathan Alarcón, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Ricardo Ferrada, MD
  • Colombia
      • Popayán, Colombia
  • Ecuador
      • Quito, Ecuador
        • Hospital General Enrique Garces
        • Contact:
  • Italy
  • Mexico
  • Peru

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Adult critically ill patients admitted to participating intensive care units with acute kidney injury requiring continuous renal replacement therapy and prescribed net ultrafiltration as part of routine clinical care.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥18 years
  • Admission to an Intensive Care Unit
  • Acute kidney injury according to KDIGO criteria
  • Prescription of continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) with net ultrafiltration
  • Clinical stability considered sufficient to initiate net ultrafiltration according to the treating clinical team

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Chronic kidney replacement therapy prior to ICU admission
  • Pregnancy
  • Limitation of therapeutic effort or goals-of-care decisions at admission or during the observation period
  • Inability to perform hemodynamic or perfusion assessment
  • Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO)
  • Refusal to participate in the study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
AKI Patients Receiving CRRT With Net Ultrafiltration
Adult critically ill patients with acute kidney injury receiving continuous renal replacement therapy with prescribed net ultrafiltration. Participants will be prospectively evaluated using a multiparametric monitoring strategy including clinical, hemodynamic, ultrasound, perfusion, and biochemical assessments. Patients will subsequently be classified according to the development or absence of ultrafiltration intolerance during the observation period.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Development of Ultrafiltration Intolerance
Time Frame: From UFNET initiation (T0) to 24 hours after initiation of net ultrafiltration
Proportion of patients who develop ultrafiltration intolerance according to the protocol-defined composite criteria, including hypotension, increased vasopressor requirements, worsening peripheral perfusion, tissue hypoperfusion, or reduction/interruption of ultrafiltration due to instability.
From UFNET initiation (T0) to 24 hours after initiation of net ultrafiltration

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Incidence of Ultrafiltration Intolerance
Time Frame: From UFNET initiation (T0) to 24 hours.
Percentage of participants who develop ultrafiltration intolerance during the observation period.
From UFNET initiation (T0) to 24 hours.
Net Ultrafiltration Rate (mL/kg/h)
Time Frame: From UFNET initiation (T0) to 24 hours.
Prescribed and achieved net ultrafiltration rate during continuous renal replacement therapy.
From UFNET initiation (T0) to 24 hours.
Time to First Ultrafiltration Intolerance Event (hours)
Time Frame: From UFNET initiation to 24 hours.
Time from UFNET initiation to the first occurrence of ultrafiltration intolerance.
From UFNET initiation to 24 hours.
Severity Category of Ultrafiltration Intolerance
Time Frame: From UFNET initiation to 24 hours.
Proportion of participants classified as having mild, moderate, or severe ultrafiltration intolerance according to protocol-defined criteria. Higher categories indicate greater severity of intolerance.
From UFNET initiation to 24 hours.
Agreement Between Hypotension-Based and Hypoperfusion-Based Definitions of Ultrafiltration Intolerance
Time Frame: From UFNET initiation to 24 hours.
Agreement between intolerance defined by hypotension criteria and intolerance defined by tissue hypoperfusion criteria, assessed using Cohen's kappa coefficient.
From UFNET initiation to 24 hours.
Cumulative Fluid Balance (mL)
Time Frame: 24 hours after UFNET initiation
Cumulative fluid balance achieved during the first 24 hours following UFNET initiation.
24 hours after UFNET initiation
Achieved Net Ultrafiltration Volume (mL)
Time Frame: 24 hours after UFNET initiation
Total net ultrafiltration volume achieved during the observation period.
24 hours after UFNET initiation
Proportion of Participants Achieving Renal Recovery
Time Frame: Up to 90 days after UFNET initiation
Percentage of participants who recover kidney function sufficiently to discontinue kidney replacement therapy according to the treating clinical team.
Up to 90 days after UFNET initiation
Ventilator-Free Days
Time Frame: Up to 28 days after UFNET initiation
Number of days alive and free from invasive mechanical ventilation.
Up to 28 days after UFNET initiation
Intensive Care Unit Mortality
Time Frame: From UFNET initiation up to 90 days or ICU discharge, whichever occurs first
Percentage of participants who die during intensive care unit admission.
From UFNET initiation up to 90 days or ICU discharge, whichever occurs first
Hospital Mortality
Time Frame: From UFNET initiation until hospital discharge, assessed up to 180 days
Percentage of participants who die during hospital admission.
From UFNET initiation until hospital discharge, assessed up to 180 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Hospital Las Higueras

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Gonzalo Ramírez-Guerrero, MD, Hospital Las Higueras de Talcahuano

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
July 6, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
June 1, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 9, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
June 11, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
June 11, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 9, 2026

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
June 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • CEC-SST-15-2026

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

IPD Plan Description

The investigators have not yet determined whether individual participant data (IPD) will be shared. Any future decision regarding data sharing will be made in accordance with institutional policies, ethical approvals, participant confidentiality requirements, and applicable regulations.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Critical Illness

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings