Traditional Versus Cluster Resistance Training in Striking Combat Sport Athletes (TRG-CLG)
Effects of Traditional and Cluster Resistance Training Using Four Multi-Joint Exercises on Neuromuscular Performance in Striking Combat Sport Athletes
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Concepción, Chile
- Universidad Católica de la Santísima Concepción
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Child
- Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Healthy men and women aged 18 years or older. Active participation in striking combat sports (boxing, kickboxing, or karate) for at least 3 years.
- Minimum of 1 year of experience with the resistance exercises included in the study (squat, bench press, deadlift, and bench pull).
- Willingness to refrain from participating in additional strength training programs during the study period.
- Provision of written informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Presence of any musculoskeletal injury during the 6 months preceding data collection.
- Any medical condition that could contraindicate participation in resistance training.
- Failure to complete the training intervention or testing procedures.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Basic Science
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Traditional
Participants performed a 6-week full-body resistance training program consisting of squat, bench press, deadlift, and bench pull exercises.
Training was conducted twice per week and included 3 sets of 8 repetitions at 75% of the individual one-repetition maximum (1RM) for each exercise.
Participants completed all repetitions consecutively within each set without intra-set rest periods.
Inter-set rest intervals were 3 minutes and inter-exercise rest intervals were 5 minutes.
|
Participants completed a 6-week full-body resistance training program consisting of squat, bench press, deadlift, and bench pull exercises.
Training was performed twice weekly and included 3 sets of 8 repetitions at 75% of the individual one-repetition maximum (1RM) for each exercise.
All repetitions within a set were performed consecutively without intra-set rest periods.
Participants were instructed to execute the concentric phase of each repetition with maximal intended velocity.
|
|
Experimental: Cluster
Participants performed the same 6-week full-body resistance training program as the traditional training group, consisting of squat, bench press, deadlift, and bench pull exercises performed twice per week.
Training included 3 sets of 8 repetitions at 75% of the individual one-repetition maximum (1RM) for each exercise.
The repetitions were organized into clusters of two repetitions separated by 15-second intra-set rest intervals (2 + 2 + 2 + 2 repetitions).
Inter-set rest intervals were 3 minutes and inter-exercise rest intervals were 5 minutes.
|
Participants completed a 6-week full-body resistance training program consisting of squat, bench press, deadlift, and bench pull exercises.
Training was performed twice weekly and included 3 sets of 8 repetitions at 75% of the individual one-repetition maximum (1RM) for each exercise.
Repetitions were organized into clusters of two repetitions separated by 15-second intra-set rest intervals (2 + 2 + 2 + 2 repetitions).
Participants were instructed to execute the concentric phase of each repetition with maximal intended velocity.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Load-velocity relationship (LVR).
Time Frame: Baseline and after 6 weeks of resistance training
|
Individual LVR were determined for the squat, bench press, and bench pull exercises using a Smith machine (FFittech, Taiwan, China), whereas the deadlift exercise was performed with a hexagonal barbell.
Each test started with an initial external load of 20 kg, which was progressively increased until the mean velocity (MV) of the fastest repetition differed by less than 0.30 m·s-1 from the theoretical MV associated with the 1RM of each exercise (0.30 m/s for squat, 0.15 m/s for deadlift, 0.17 m/s for bench press, and 0.50 m/s for bench pull) (Weakley et al., 2021).
The load increments were adjusted according to the exercise and movement velocity to ensure an appropriate distribution of loads across the individual force-velocity spectrum.
Three repetitions were performed at lighter loads, whereas only two repetitions were completed at heavier loads.
A standardized rest interval of 10 seconds was provided between repetitions at the same load.
|
Baseline and after 6 weeks of resistance training
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Countermovement jump
Time Frame: Baseline and after 6 weeks of resistance training
|
Participants completed three CMJ attempts with a 1-minute recovery period between trials.
From a standing position with feet approximately shoulder-width apart and hands placed on the hips, participants performed a rapid countermovement to a self-selected depth and immediately executed a maximal vertical jump.
Jump height was estimated from flight time using the equation: height = (flight time2 × 9.81 m·s-2) / 8, where 9.81 m·s-2 corresponds to gravitational acceleration.
Flight time was recorded using an infrared optical measurement system (OptoJump, Microgate, Bolzano, Italy).
Participants were instructed to maintain their hands on the hips during the entire movement and to land with the lower limbs fully extended.
Trials not complying with these technical requirements were discarded and repeated after 1 minute of rest under the supervision of the same experienced evaluator.
The best performance obtained across the three trials was retained for subsequent analyses.
|
Baseline and after 6 weeks of resistance training
|
|
Medicine ball throw (MBT).
Time Frame: Baseline and after 6 weeks of resistance training
|
Upper-body explosive performance was evaluated using a seated MBT test performed with a 3-kg medicine ball.
Testing was conducted indoors on a hardwood surface.
Participants sat behind a marked line with both feet in contact with the floor and executed a single-arm forward chest-pass action from a stable seated position.
Throws were performed separately with the dominant and non-dominant arms, using a coordinated movement involving the trunk and upper-limb musculature.
Throwing distance was determined as the linear distance between the starting line and the first point of ball contact with the floor, measured with a tape measure.
Three maximal attempts were completed with each arm, with 1 minute of recovery between trials.
The greatest distance achieved with each arm was retained for subsequent statistical analyses.
|
Baseline and after 6 weeks of resistance training
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- UGR-TRG-CLG-2024
- 25KJA180002 (Other Grant/Funding Number: Major Project of Basic Science (Natural Science) Research in Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.