Coeliac Plexus vs Splanchnic Nerve Neurolysis for Upper Abdominal Cancer Pain

June 12, 2026 updated by: Kazi Mahzabin Arin, Bangladesh Medical University

Effect of Coeliac Plexus Versus Splanchnic Nerve Neurolysis in Pain Management With Upper Abdominal Malignancies

The goal of this clinical trial is to determine whether Neurolytic Splanchnic Nerve Block (NSNB) reduces pain in adults with upper abdominal malignancies. It will also evaluate the safety of Neurolytic Splanchnic Nerve Block (NSNB). The main questions it aims to answer are:

Does NSNB reduce pain intensity compared to Neurolytic Coeliac Plexus Block (NCPB), as measured by the Visual Analog Scale (VAS)? What adverse effects do participants experience when receiving Neurolytic Splanchnic Nerve Block (NSNB)?

Investigators will compare Neurolytic Splanchnic Nerve Block (NSNB) with Neurolytic Coeliac Plexus Block (NCPB) to determine which intervention provides more effective and safer pain relief.

Participants will:

  • receive either NSNB or NCPB under fluoroscopic guidance
  • be monitored immediately and for 2 hours after the procedure for any complications Have their pain intensity recorded immediately after the procedure, and at 7 days, 1 month, and 3 months
  • be evaluated for quality-of-life using European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire - Core 3 (EORTC QLQ-C30) at 1 month and 3 months.
  • have their opioid consumption tracked throughout the study.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

This study is a quasi-experimental, interventional trial conducted at the Division of Pain Medicine & Regional Anaesthesia, Department of Anaesthesia, Analgesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Bangladesh Medical University, Dhaka. Adult patients diagnosed with upper abdominal malignancies (including pancreatic, gastric, hepatic, or biliary origin) who report moderate to severe pain (VAS ≥5) and have no contraindications for nerve blocks will be enrolled.

Eligible participants will be allocated in a 1:1 ratio into two groups. The control group will receive a fluoroscopy-guided Neurolytic Coeliac Plexus Block (NCPB). The procedure involves patient positioning in the prone posture with abdominal flexion, identification of anatomical landmark L1 under posteroanterior and oblique C-arm fluoroscopy, skin infiltration with local anesthetic, and injection of 3 mL 0.25% bupivacaine, followed by 20 mL of 70% alcohol for neurolysis, with 1 mL saline flush during needle withdrawal to prevent tract formation. The study group will receive a fluoroscopy-guided Neurolytic Splanchnic Nerve Block (NSNB) using a similar approach, with needle placement at the T11-T12 level, 3 mL of local anesthetic, and 10 mL of 70% alcohol for neurolysis.

Baseline evaluations will include a complete blood count, a coagulation profile (prothrombin time, bleeding time, clotting time, INR), a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain score, and a quality-of-life assessment using the EORTC QLQ-C30. Participants will be monitored immediately and for 2 hours post-procedure for complications, including hypotension, diarrhea, back or shoulder pain, pneumothorax, or neurological changes.

Follow-up assessments will occur immediately post-procedure, at 7 days, 1 month, and 3 months. Pain intensity, opioid consumption, and quality-of-life scores will be recorded.

This study aims to provide comparative data on analgesic efficacy, opioid-sparing effects, safety, and quality-of-life outcomes between NCPB and NSNB in patients with upper abdominal malignancies.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

44

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Dhaka, Bangladesh, 1000
        • Recruiting
        • Bangladesh Medical University
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Nadia Sultana, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Kazi Mahzabin Arin, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Md Mostafa Kamal, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adult patient
  • Both genders
  • Diagnosed case of upper abdominal malignancy (pancreatic, gastric, hepatic, or biliary origin)
  • Experiencing moderate to severe pain (≥5 on a 10 point visual analog scale)
  • Patients who are conscious and can communicate
  • No Contraindication for nerve block (e.g., coagulopathy, anticoagulant drugs)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Previous coeliac plexus block, splanchnic nerve block, or major abdominal nerve ablation
  • Severe spinal deformities or anatomical distortion at the coeliac plexus or splanchnic nerve site
  • Local or systemic infection at or near the block site
  • Known allergy to local anesthetics or neurolytic agents
  • Pregnancy
  • Lactating mother
  • Cognitive impairment or psychiatric illness

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Intervention Group
Fluoroscopy-guided neurolytic splanchnic nerve block performed in adults with upper abdominal malignancies. Patients are positioned prone with proper support. Using posteroanterior and lateral C-arm fluoroscopy, T11-T12 vertebral bodies and the junction of the rib and vertebral body are identified. After local anesthetic infiltration, a Chiba needle is advanced to the anterior one-third of the lateral vertebral body. Contrast dye is injected to confirm placement. Neurolysis is performed using 10 mL of 70% alcohol, preceded by 2-3 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine. A 1 mL saline flush is given during needle withdrawal to prevent track formation. Patients are monitored immediately and for 2 hours post-procedure for complications including hypotension, diarrhea, back pain, shoulder pain, pneumothorax, or neurological changes.
Active Comparator: Control group
Fluoroscopy-guided neurolytic coeliac plexus block performed on adult patients with upper abdominal malignancies. Patients are positioned prone with a pillow under the abdomen. Using posteroanterior and oblique C-arm fluoroscopy, the T12-L1 vertebral bodies are identified. After local anesthetic infiltration, 3 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine is injected, followed by 20 mL of 70% alcohol for neurolysis. A 1 mL saline flush is given during needle withdrawal to prevent track formation. Patients are monitored immediately and for 2 hours post-procedure for adverse effects including hypotension, diarrhea, back pain, shoulder pain, or neurological changes.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain intensity reduction as measured by the Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Time Frame: Baseline, Immediately after the intervention, at 7 days, 1 month, and 3 months post-procedure
This measure evaluates the effectiveness of Neurolytic Splanchnic Nerve Block (NSNB) compared to Neurolytic Coeliac Plexus Block (NCPB) in reducing pain in patients with upper abdominal malignancies. Zero indicates no pain, and 10 indicates the worst possible pain.
Baseline, Immediately after the intervention, at 7 days, 1 month, and 3 months post-procedure

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Opioid Consumption
Time Frame: Baseline, Day 7, 1 month, and 3 months post-procedure.
This measures whether the intervention reduces the need for systemic opioids.
Baseline, Day 7, 1 month, and 3 months post-procedure.
Quality of Life using scores from the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire - Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30)
Time Frame: Baseline, 1 month and 3 months post-procedure.
This assesses functional, symptom, and global health aspects of patient well-being following nerve block interventions. Scores range from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate better global health and functioning, while higher symptom scores indicate worse symptoms.
Baseline, 1 month and 3 months post-procedure.
Incidence of immediate or delayed complications, including hypotension, diarrhea, back pain, shoulder pain, pneumothorax, or neurological changes.
Time Frame: Immediately post-procedure and during follow-up visits up to 3 months.
This evaluates the safety profile of NSNB compared to NCPB
Immediately post-procedure and during follow-up visits up to 3 months.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

October 30, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

January 31, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 12, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 12, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

June 17, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 17, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 12, 2026

Last Verified

June 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • BMU/2026/1940

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Abdominal Neoplasms

Clinical Trials on Neurolytic Coeliac Plexus Block (NCPB)

Search Similar Trials