Dry Cupping Therapy and Muscle Energy Technique on Upper Crossed Syndrome

June 13, 2026 updated by: Amira saad mohamed

Effect of Combined Dry Cupping Therapy and Muscle Energy Technique on Upper Crossed Syndrome Patients. A Randomized Control Study

This study evaluated and compared the therapeutic efficacy of combining Dry Cupping therapy with the Muscle Energy Technique (MET) against each intervention applied independently, focusing on three core parameters: Neck Disability Index (NDI), Craniovertebral Angle (CVA), and Sagittal Shoulder-C7 Angle (SSA).

Study Overview

Status

Active, not recruiting

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

This study evaluated and compared the therapeutic efficacy of combining Dry Cupping therapy with the Muscle Energy Technique (MET) against each intervention applied independently, focusing on three core parameters: Neck Disability Index (NDI), Craniovertebral Angle (CVA), and Sagittal Shoulder-C7 Angle (SSA).

Methods: A pre-test post-test double-blinded randomized controlled trial design was employed. Seventy-six adults (aged 20-40 years) diagnosed with UCS were randomly allocated into four equal experimental groups (n = 19 per group): Group A received combined dry cupping and MET with conventional therapy; Group B received dry cupping with conventional therapy; Group C received MET with conventional therapy; and Group D received conventional therapy alone. Interventions were conducted over an 8-week period. Primary outcomes included functional impairment via the Arabic version of the NDI, and objective sagittal alignment parameters (CVA and SSA) measured using precision photometry via the Kinovea software application.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

76

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Giza, Egypt
        • Cairo University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Participant inclusion was restricted to individuals between 20 and 40 years of age.
  • The exact diagnostic criteria required a baseline craniovertebral angle (CVA) of less than 48 degrees.
  • a sagittal shoulder-C7 angle (SSA) of less than 52 degrees.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • acute post-surgical conditions
  • structural spinal deformities (e.g., severe fixed structural scoliosis)
  • cervical radiculopathy, or localized dermal infections contradicting cupping application.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Group A (Combined group)
Group A (Combined group): This group of nineteen subjects received combined dry cupping therapy, Muscle energy techniques, and conventional physical therapy.

19 subjects received combined dry cupping therapy, Muscle energy technique, and conventional physical therapy for eight weeks.

  1. Dry cupping was applied to the regional hypertonic target sites. Standard plastic cups ranging from 25 to 50 mm were placed directly over each subject's levator scapulae trigger point (SI-14) and upper trapezius trigger point (GB-21) bilaterally. The treatment duration was set at exactly 8 minutes per session.
  2. Muscle Energy Technique The Post-Isometric Relaxation (PIR) manual protocol targeted the hypertonic muscles of the upper crossed syndrome quadrant, including the upper trapezius, levator scapulae, sternocleidomastoid, scalenes, and suboccipital groups. Participants were placed in a supine position on the treatment table with their head free from the edge of the plinth, supported by the physical therapist.
  3. conventional physical therapy treatment
Experimental: Group B (Cupping group)
Group B (Cupping group): This group of nineteen subjects received dry cupping therapy and conventional physical therapy.

19 subjects received combined dry cupping therapy and conventional physical therapy for eight weeks.

  1. Dry cupping was applied to the regional hypertonic target sites. Standard plastic cups ranging from 25 to 50 mm were placed directly over each subject's levator scapulae trigger point (SI-14) and upper trapezius trigger point (GB-21) bilaterally. The treatment duration was set at exactly 8 minutes per session.
  2. conventional physical therapy treatment
Experimental: Group C (MET group)
Group C (MET group): This group of nineteen subjects received Muscle energy techniques and conventional physical therapy.

19 subjects received combined Muscle energy technique, and conventional physical therapy for eight weeks.

  1. Muscle Energy Technique The Post-Isometric Relaxation (PIR) manual protocol targeted the hypertonic muscles of the upper crossed syndrome quadrant, including the upper trapezius, levator scapulae, sternocleidomastoid, scalenes, and suboccipital groups. Participants were placed in a supine position on the treatment table with their head free from the edge of the plinth, supported by the physical therapist.
  2. conventional physical therapy treatment
Active Comparator: Group D (Control group)
Group D (Control group): This group of nineteen subjects received conventional physical therapy alone
19 subjects received only conventional physical therapy for eight weeks.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Neck Disability Index (NDI)
Time Frame: At baseline and re assessed following 8 weeks
Perceived functional limitations resulting from regional impairment were measured using the validated Arabic version of the NDI questionnaire. This instrument evaluates 10 clinical sections (including activities of daily living, concentration, and pain profiles) scored from 0 to 5 per item, yielding a cumulative score out of 50. Higher aggregate indices represent greater functional disability.
At baseline and re assessed following 8 weeks
craniovertebral angle (CVA)
Time Frame: At baseline and re assessed following 8 weeks
This biomechanical index reflects the architectural severity of forward head posture. It is defined as the angle formed between a horizontal line drawn through the spinous process of C7 and an intersecting line extending from the tragus of the ear to the C7 landmark. CVA was measured using precision digital photogrammetry via the Kinovea software application.
At baseline and re assessed following 8 weeks
Sagittal Shoulder-C7 Angle (SSA)
Time Frame: At baseline and re assessed following 8 weeks
This geometric marker quantifies shoulder roundedness and anterior protraction. It is formed by the intersection of a horizontal reference line passing through the lateral aspect of the acromion with a line drawn from the C7 spinous process to the lateral acromion. SSA was measured using precision digital photogrammetry via the Kinovea software application.
At baseline and re assessed following 8 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 18, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 30, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 13, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 13, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

June 17, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 17, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 13, 2026

Last Verified

June 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 012/006489

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Upper Crossed Syndrome

Clinical Trials on combined therapy teatment

Search Similar Trials