Automated Passive Case-Finding for Advanced Liver Fibrosis in MASLD: The LiverSeek Programme (LiverSeek)

June 14, 2026 updated by: Luis Ibañez, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañon

Towards Universal Screening for Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Liver Fibrosis in Primary Care: Evaluation of a Single-Step, Laboratory Informatión System-Driven Automated Case-Finding Strategy (LiverSeek)

LiverSeek is a fully automated, passive case-finding programme for advanced liver fibrosis associated with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) in primary care. The programme operates through the Laboratory Information System (LIS; Modulab/Biwer Analytics) of the Clinical Biochemistry Laboratory at Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón (HGUGM), covering approximately 350,000 inhabitants across 11 peri-urban primary care centres affiliated to SERMAS (Servicio Madrileño de Salud) in Madrid, Spain.

When a high-risk patient (age 50-75 years with ≥1 of: ALT above ULN + HbA1c ≥6.5%; ALT above ULN + BMI >30; BMI >30 + HbA1c ≥6.5%) undergoes a routine blood test in primary care, the LIS automatically calculates FIB-4. If FIB-4 >1.30, the system reflexively orders ELF and MASEF from the same serum sample, without any action required from the primary care clinician. Patients with a positive second-step NIT (ELF ≥9.8 or MASEF ≥0.33) receive an automatic alert directing them to the Hepatology Advanced Practice Nurse for VCTE (FibroScan) and clinical evaluation.

The primary objective is to evaluate the prevalence of hepatic fibrosis in the high-risk population using this single-step automated strategy. Secondary objectives include head-to-head diagnostic comparison of FIB-4+ELF vs FIB-4+MASEF vs FIB-4+FAST for histologically-confirmed endpoints (significant fibrosis ≥F2, advanced fibrosis ≥F3, at-risk MASH), evaluation of the Liver Risk Score, and a health-economic analysis. A sub-study evaluates a nurse-led structured lifestyle intervention in NIT-positive patients.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Detailed Description

LiverSeek addresses a well-recognised implementation gap: despite guideline recommendations to screen for liver fibrosis in high-risk metabolic patients, fewer than one-third of eligible patients are assessed in clinical practice. Encounter-triggered programmes (e.g., SOLID, PRELUDE1) require primary care clinicians to initiate the assessment process, creating a dependency on clinician awareness and workload capacity that limits scalability.

LiverSeek adopts a fundamentally different model: the screening process is initiated passively by the LIS infrastructure, triggered by existing routine blood test data, with zero additional burden on the primary care clinician. This passive architecture is the programme's principal conceptual innovation.

NIT pathway and pre-specified thresholds:

Step 1 (LIS-triggered): FIB-4 calculated automatically. Threshold: >1.30 (EASL 2024) Step 2 (reflex, same serum sample): ELF (threshold ≥9.8) and MASEF (threshold ≥0.33, Youden J-point) Step 2 alternative (VCTE-based): VCTE ≥8.0 kPa; FAST score ≥0.50 (Youden J-point) NIT-positive patients → Hepatology APN visit (VCTE, anthropometrics, clinical assessment, EQ-5D-5L, IEXPAC, MEDAS dietary questionnaire) NIT-positive patients with VCTE ≥8.0 kPa → Hepatology physician consultation ± liver biopsy per clinical criteria

Histological sub-study: Liver biopsy specimens are scored using the NAFLD Activity Score (Kleiner 2005). At-risk MASH is defined as NAS ≥4 + fibrosis stage ≥F2. A target of approximately 300 evaluable biopsies is projected.

Lifestyle intervention sub-study: NIT-positive patients receive a single structured APN-delivered visit with a personalised SMART lifestyle protocol, with 24-week reassessment. Outcomes include changes in LSM, CAP, ALT, AST, GGT, HbA1c, FIB-4, and body composition (BIA).

Data management: REDCap electronic case report form, pseudonymised, restricted access.

Statistical approach: Prevalence with 95% CI (primary endpoint); AUROC with DeLong test for head-to-head NIT comparisons; sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, LR+ and LR- for sequential algorithms; kappa for concordance. Health-economic analysis via CIBERehd.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
3000

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients attending primary care in peri-urban Madrid (SERMAS network) with metabolic risk factors for liver fibrosis, identified passively through routine laboratory data

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age between 50 and 75 years (inclusive)
  2. Routine blood test processed in the Clinical Biochemistry Laboratory of Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, ordered by a primary care physician in one of the 11 affiliated SERMAS primary care centres

  3. Presence of at least one of the following metabolic risk factor combinations:

    • ALT above the upper limit of normal AND HbA1c ≥6.5%
    • ALT above the upper limit of normal AND BMI >30 kg/m²
    • BMI >30 kg/m² AND HbA1c ≥6.5%

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Age <50 years or >75 years
  2. Known pre-existing liver disease (significant or advanced fibrosis, cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma, prior liver transplantation)
  3. Prior fibrosis assessment within the preceding 12 months.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
NIT-Negative Cohort
High-risk patients (age 50-75 years with ≥1 metabolic risk criterion) in whom FIB-4 was automatically calculated by the LIS and found to be ≤1.30. These patients do not undergo further NIT evaluation and are followed as the non-exposed reference cohort.
NIT-Positive Cohort
High-risk patients with FIB-4 >1.30 in whom ELF and MASEF were reflexively determined from the same serum sample. Patients with ELF ≥9.8 or MASEF ≥0.33 are referred to the Hepatology Advanced Practice Nurse for VCTE (FibroScan) and clinical assessment.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Prevalence of hepatic fibrosis detected by the automated single-step case-finding strategy
Time Frame: Within 3 months of index blood test
Proportion of high-risk patients with a positive result on at least one confirmatory NIT (ELF ≥9.8, MASEF ≥0.33, or VCTE ≥8.0 kPa) among all patients in whom FIB-4 was automatically calculated by the LIS
Within 3 months of index blood test

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Diagnostic accuracy of FIB-4+ELF versus FIB-4+MASEF for histologically-confirmed significant fibrosis (≥F2)
Time Frame: At time of liver biopsy
Head-to-head AUROC comparison (DeLong method) of sequential NIT algorithms at pre-specified thresholds (ELF ≥9.8; MASEF ≥0.33) in biopsied patients. Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV reported.
At time of liver biopsy
Diagnostic accuracy of sequential NIT algorithms for at-risk MASH
Time Frame: At time of liver biopsy
AUROC comparison of FIB-4+ELF, FIB-4+MASEF, and FIB-4+FAST (threshold ≥0.50) for histological at-risk MASH (NAS ≥4 + fibrosis ≥F2, Kleiner criteria) in biopsied patients
At time of liver biopsy
Cost-effectiveness of the automated single-step strategy versus standard of care
Time Frame: At study completion (September 2027)
Health-economic analysis: diagnostic yield per euro spent, cost per case detected, and cost per QALY gained
At study completion (September 2027)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañon

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañón
Consorcio Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red (CIBER)

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Chair: Rafael Bañares, Full-Professor of Medicine, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, President of Spanish Association for the Study of the Liver (AEEH)
  • Study Chair: Magdalena Salcedo, MD, PhD, President of the Spanish Society of Liver Transplantation (SETH)

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
October 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
June 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
September 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
June 14, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 14, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
June 22, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
June 22, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 14, 2026

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
June 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • HEP-OSF2024 (Other Identifier: Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Individual participant data will not be shared publicly. Aggregate results will be disseminated via peer-reviewed publication and conference presentations. Data are held pseudonymised in REDCap under GDPR (EU 2016/679) and Spanish data protection law (LO 03/2018).

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings