Qualitative and Quantitative Assessment of Marginal Bone Loss Following Flapless Guided Versus Conventional Implant Placement
Qualitative and Quantitative Assessment of Marginal Bone Loss Following Flapless Guided Versus Conventional Implant Placement Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography - A Split-Mouth Randomized Controlled Trial.
Marginal bone preservation is an important determinant of long-term implant success. Conventional flap implant placement provides direct visualization of the surgical site but may disturb the periosteal blood supply and contribute to early crestal bone remodeling.
Flapless guided implant placement is a minimally invasive approach that aims to preserve soft tissue architecture and vascular integrity. CBCT allows three-dimensional evaluation of peri implant bone levels, including mesial, distal, buccal, and lingual aspects.
Aim: The aim of this study was to compare flapless guided implant placement with conventional flap implant placement in terms of marginal bone loss, implant stability, postoperative pain, and soft-tissue healing.
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Ajman Emirate
-
Ajman, Ajman Emirate, United Arab Emirates, 00000
- Gulf Medical University
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients aged 20 years or older.
- Patients requiring at least two dental implants within the same arch.
- Patients with good general health and able to undergo oral surgery.
- Patients willing to participate in the study and provide informed consent.
- Patients with adequate bone volume for implant placement as determined by preoperative radiographic assessment (e.g., cone beam computed tomography).
Exclusion criteria:
- Patients with systemic diseases that could compromise healing or implant success (e.g., uncontrolled diabetes, immunocompromised conditions).
- Patients with a history of radiation therapy to the head and neck region.
- Patients with active periodontal disease or untreated oral infections.
- Patients who are pregnant or breastfeeding.
- Patients with a history of bisphosphonate therapy or other medications that may affect bone metabolism.
- Smoker Patients with a history of smoking or heavy alcohol consumption.
- Patients with unrealistic expectations or inability to comply with postoperative care instructions.
- Patients with significant facial trauma or anatomical deformities affecting the implant site.
- Patient who requires Immediate implant placement
- Thin gingival biotype
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: Single
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Flapless Guided Implant Placement
|
a minimally invasive dental implant procedure where a surgical guide, often created using advanced imaging techniques like cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and computer-aided design (CAD), directs the precise placement of dental implants without the need for traditional flap elevation.
|
|
Experimental: Conventional Flap Implant Placement
|
manually raising the gingival tissue during dental implant surgery, this surgical procedure involves the placement of a dental implant directly into the alveolar or basal bone during a single session followed by the placement of a healing abutment without the use of surgical guides or advanced technology.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Marginal Bone Loss
Time Frame: baseline, 3 months, 6 months
|
CBCT assessment
|
baseline, 3 months, 6 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Implant Stability ISQ
Time Frame: baseline, 3 months, 6 months
|
Implant stability was assessed as a secondary outcome using Resonance Frequency Analysis (RFA), which provides an objective and non-invasive measurement of implant stability expressed as the Implant Stability Quotient (ISQ).
|
baseline, 3 months, 6 months
|
|
Postoperative Pain Assessment VAS scale 0-10
Time Frame: baseline, Day 2 Day 3 Day 4 Day 5
|
VAS scale 0-10
|
baseline, Day 2 Day 3 Day 4 Day 5
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- AbdallahMDSperio
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on CBCT Segmentation
-
NCT04092699UnknownSinus Volume | CBCT Segmentation
-
NCT05441423Not yet recruitingCBCT - Condyle - Semi-automated Segmentation - Ultra-low Dose
-
NCT06912568CompletedRoot Resorption | Orthodontic Appliance | CBCT Segmentation
-
NCT05055986Recruiting
-
NCT05435417Recruiting
-
NCT04563117Not yet recruitingAutomatic Registration of Digital Dental Model to CBCT Image
-
NCT03177200CompletedHealth and Social Services | Population Segmentation Healthcare
-
NCT05351372CompletedEvaluate CBCT Protocols in Subjective Image Quality
-
NCT06546592RecruitingArtificial Intelligence | Deep Learning | Radiation Therapy | Segmentation | Contouring
Clinical Trials on Flapless guided implant
-
NCT07654452CompletedPartial Edentulism | Tooth Loss | Dental Implant | Maxillary Tooth Loss
-
NCT02435706CompletedGingival Recession | Bone Loss, Alveolar
-
NCT04760457CompletedComplete Edentulism | Edentulous Mouth
-
NCT04459494Completed
-
NCT03001752CompletedIsolated Premolar Edentulous Site
-
NCT03690973Completed
-
NCT06417788RecruitingPartially Edentulous Patients | Bone Crest of at Least 10 mm Length and 6 mm Width | Patients of at Least 18 Years Old
-
NCT07008079CompletedDental Implant | Dental Implant Placement | IMPLANTATION | Peri-Implant Tissues