The Role of Isometric in Individuals With Rheumatoid Arthritis

June 26, 2026 updated by: Zülal TATAR

The Role of Isometric Exercise on Pain Modulation and Muscle Oxygenation in Individuals With Rheumatoid Arthritis

The aim of this study is to investigate the acute effects of isometric exercise on pain modulation and muscle oxygenation in individuals with rheumatoid arthritis.

Study Overview

Status

Enrolling by invitation

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

66

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Eligibility Criteria:
  • Diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis
  • Being between 18-65 years of age
  • Volunteering to participate in the study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Having a neurological disease
  • Having pulmonary or cardiovascular problems that may affect daily living activities
  • Sensory system disorders
  • Previous upper extremity surgery
  • Having cognitive impairment
  • Having an accompanying rheumatic disease
  • Fracture, dislocation, or surgical intervention in the hand/wrist region within the last 6 months
  • Communication limitations that prevent following the study protocol
  • Having an exercise history in the last six months

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Control Group
Active Comparator: Execise group
To determine isometric exercise intensity, a maximum repetition will be calculated individually using a handheld dynamometer. One maximum repetition will be defined as the highest value among the trials where participants squeezed the handheld dynamometer as hard as possible for 5 seconds. The average of 3 repetitions will be taken to determine one maximum repetition, with a 1-2 minute rest period between each repetition. 30% of one maximum repetition will be determined. The exercise will begin five minutes after this stage. During the exercise task, participants will squeeze the dynamometer at 30% of one maximum repetition for 3 consecutive minutes, adjusting the applied force as needed to maintain the desired strength level.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Temporal Summation Measurement
Time Frame: Day 1
Ten stimuli of pressure pain threshold size will be applied to the volar (palm side) region of the non-dominant forearm using a pressure algometer. The difference between the first and tenth stimuli will be recorded. The pain level during the first and tenth stimuli will also be recorded according to GAS. The difference will be calculated.
Day 1
Visual Analog Scale (VAS) - Pain
Time Frame: Day 1
The VAS is a 10 cm long scale drawn horizontally or vertically, starting with "No pain" and ending with "Unbearable pain." The patient is instructed to mark a point on this line corresponding to the intensity of their pain. The distance from the lowest VAS level to the patient's mark is measured with a ruler and recorded in centimeters.
Day 1
Pain Tolerance Assessment
Time Frame: Day 1
Gradual pressure will be applied to the volar (palm side) region of the non-dominant forearm using a pressure gauge (initial intensity-0 kPa, rate-30 kPa/s, 3 repetitions, interval between stimuli-45 seconds). The maximum pressure that participants can tolerate will be recorded as the pressure is increased. The average of 3 consecutive measurements will be taken. The tip of the gauge will be shifted 0.5 cm between repetitions to avoid changes in skin sensitivity. Pain was assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). The VAS consists of a 10-cm horizontal line ranging from 0 to 10, where 0 indicates "no pain" and 10 indicates "the worst pain imaginable." Total scores range from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating greater pain severity (worse outcome).
Day 1
Pressure Pain Threshold Assessment
Time Frame: Day 1
Based on the modified limits method, a pressure algometer will be used to apply gradual pressure to the volar (palm-side) region of the non-dominant forearm (initial intensity-0 kPa, velocity-30 kPa/s, 3 repetitions, interval between stimuli-45 seconds). Participants will inform the investigator when they first perceive pain. The pressure pain threshold will be taken as the average of 3 consecutive measurements. The algometer tip will be shifted 0.5 cm between repetitions to avoid changes in skin sensitivity. Pain was assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). The VAS consists of a 10-cm horizontal line ranging from 0 to 10, where 0 indicates "no pain" and 10 indicates "the worst pain imaginable." Total scores range from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating greater pain severity (worse outcome).
Day 1
Conditional Pain Modulation Assessment
Time Frame: Day 1
A conditioning pressure stimulus will be applied to the non-dominant upper extremity, and the pressure pain threshold will be measured in the dominant upper extremity. The non-dominant hand will be immersed up to the wrist in a bucket of water at 37°C for 10 seconds to induce conditioning. The patient will then be asked to immerse their hand in water adjusted to 46°C for 30 seconds. This temperature has been used in many previous studies. During this time, the pressure pain threshold will be measured on the volar portion of the forearm of the contralateral extremity. Pain was assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). The VAS consists of a 10-cm horizontal line ranging from 0 to 10, where 0 indicates "no pain" and 10 indicates "the worst pain imaginable." Total scores range from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating greater pain severity (worse outcome).
Day 1

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Quantitative Sensory Tests
Time Frame: Day 1
Current evidence for determining pain phenotypes (Kosek et al.) recommends performing quantitative sensory testing. Quantitative sensory testing is divided into static tactile mechanical fixation threshold, hot-cold pain threshold, static mechanical allodynia, dynamic mechanical allodynia, and vibration assessment All assessments will be performed on the patient's non-dominant upper extremity.
Day 1
Muscle Oxygen Saturation Measurement
Time Frame: Day 1
Oxygen saturation measurement will be performed using the MOXY (Fortiori Design LLC., Minnesota, USA) device. MOXY is a medical device measuring 61x44x21mm and weighing 42g. It is an infrared measuring device that measures oxygen saturation and total hemoglobin in muscle capillaries. It has self-adhesive light emitting and reflected light sensors placed a few centimeters apart on the skin. These devices penetrate the tissue a few centimeters using light and various algorithms to provide information about peripheral oxygen saturation in the microcirculation. It is a system that takes infrared measurements with 4 separate LED lights, penetrating to a depth of 12 mm to 25 mm, and provides the average numerically. It is a non-invasive method. In this study, muscle oxygen saturation will be measured over a three-minute period.
Day 1
The Body Awareness Questionnaire
Time Frame: Day 1
The Body Awareness Questionnaire is a questionnaire consisting of 18 statements divided into four subgroups (Changes in body processes, sleep-wake cycle, prediction of disease onset, prediction of body responses) designed to determine the level of sensitivity to normal or abnormal body composition. Participants are asked to rate each statement on a scale of one to seven. The questionnaire uses a total score for the rating. A higher score indicates better body sensitivity.
Day 1
ABILHAND Rheumatoid Arthritis Hand Function Questionnaire
Time Frame: Day 1
The ABILHAND-RA questionnaire focuses on functional items that best represent hand activities. Manual dexterity will be assessed using the ABILHAND-RA inventory, which consists of 27 common hand-use-based activities. Each activity will be scored as follows: 0 = impossible, 1 = difficult, 2 = easy. Volunteers will be asked to rate the ease with which they perform daily living activities, regardless of which limb is used or the method employed.
Day 1
Pain Catastrophizing Scale
Time Frame: Day 1
The Pain Catastrophizing Scale was used to assess feelings and thoughts related to pain. This scale consists of 13 items. Each question is scored on a 5-point scale (0: Never, 1: Somewhat, 2: Moderately, 3: Severely, 4: Always). The scale consists of 3 sub-sections: helplessness, magnification, and rumination. The total score ranges from 0 to 52. Higher scores indicate higher pain catastrophizing.
Day 1
The International Physical Activity Questionnaire - Short Form
Time Frame: Day 1
The International Physical Activity Questionnaire - Short Form assesses energy expenditure over the past week in total METs. It consists of seven questions. The total score is calculated by including the total duration (minutes) and frequency (days) of walking, moderate-intensity activity, and vigorous-intensity activity. For an activity to be included in the total score, each activity must have lasted at least 10 minutes. The questionnaire calculates a score in "MET-minutes/week (MET-min/week)" using the minutes spent during the activity, the number of days per week the activity was performed, and the MET value specified in the questionnaire.
Day 1

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 11, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

November 11, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 11, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 18, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 18, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

June 24, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 30, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 26, 2026

Last Verified

December 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • Isometric Exercise

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.