Laser vs Lontophoresis in KOA
Effectiveness of Laser Therapy Versus Lontophoresis in the Management of Knee Osteoarthritis: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: abdulaziz fahad alsulaimani, MASTER
- Phone Number: 966566613748
- Email: azoztaif88@hotmail.com
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
* Age 45-65 years.
- Diagnosed primary knee osteoarthritis (Grade I-II).
- Both genders.
- Ability to follow treatment protocol.
Exclusion Criteria:
* Previous knee surgery.
- Intra-articular injections within last 6 months.
- Pacemaker.
- Skin lesions at treatment area.
- Severe neurological or cardiovascular disorders.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Group A:
Low-Level Laser Therapy
|
Low-level laser therapy combined with conventional physical therapy for patients with knee osteoarthritis to reduce pain and improve functional mobility and knee joint range of motion
Conventional physical therapy program for patients with knee osteoarthritis including therapeutic exercises, stretching, strengthening exercises, and pain relief modalities to improve knee function and mobility.
|
|
Active Comparator: Group B
Iontophoresis
|
Conventional physical therapy program for patients with knee osteoarthritis including therapeutic exercises, stretching, strengthening exercises, and pain relief modalities to improve knee function and mobility.
Iontophoresis using dexamethasone combined with conventional physical therapy for patients with knee osteoarthritis to reduce pain and improve physical function and knee joint mobility
|
|
Active Comparator: Group C
Conventional Physical Therapy Only
|
Conventional physical therapy program for patients with knee osteoarthritis including therapeutic exercises, stretching, strengthening exercises, and pain relief modalities to improve knee function and mobility.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
|---|---|
|
Pain intensity measured using Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
Time Frame: Baseline and after 4 weeks of treatment
|
Baseline and after 4 weeks of treatment
|
|
Functional disability measured using WOMAC.
Time Frame: Baseline and after 4 weeks of treatment
|
Baseline and after 4 weeks of treatment
|
|
3. Knee Range of Motion (ROM).
Time Frame: Baseline and after 4 weeks of treatment
|
Baseline and after 4 weeks of treatment
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in physical function assessed by the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Physical Function Subscale
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 0) and Week 4
|
The WOMAC Physical Function Subscale consists of 17 items assessing difficulty in performing daily activities.
Scores range from 0 to 68, with higher scores indicating worse physical function.
|
Baseline (Day 0) and Week 4
|
|
2. Reduction of joint stiffness.
Time Frame: Baseline and after 4 weeks of treatment
|
Baseline and after 4 weeks of treatment
|
|
|
Change in daily activities performance assessed by the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Physical Function Subscale
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 0) and Week 4
|
The WOMAC Physical Function Subscale consists of 17 items assessing difficulty in activities of daily living.
Scores range from 0 to 68, with higher scores indicating worse functional limitation.
|
Baseline (Day 0) and Week 4
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Study Chair: hane mohamed hamed, PHD, professor of orthopedic surgery depaetment of orthopedic surgery faculty of medicine kafrelsheikh university
- Study Chair: mahmoud mohamed ewida, PHD, professor of basic sciences for physical therapy department of basic sciences for physical therapy faculty oh physical therapy kafrelsheikh university
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Estimated)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- KFSIRB200-1047
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.