Morphological and Functional Biomarkers of Skeletal Muscle Adaptations in Sarcopenia (EXEDOS)

July 9, 2026 updated by: I.R.C.C.S Ospedale Galeazzi-Sant'Ambrogio

Morphological and Functional Biomarkers of Skeletal Muscle Adaptations for Early Detection of Sarcopenia and of the Therapeutic Effects of a Home-Based Exercise Intervention: A Randomized-Controlled Trial

Sarcopenia is an age-related condition characterized by progressive loss of skeletal muscle mass, muscle strength, and physical performance. It is associated with frailty, falls, disability, reduced independence, lower quality of life, and increased healthcare burden. Despite its clinical relevance, sarcopenia remains underdiagnosed, partly because current diagnostic approaches may be difficult to implement broadly in clinical practice and may not fully capture early changes in muscle quality and neuromuscular function.

The EXEDOS study aims to evaluate an integrated diagnostic and therapeutic strategy for the early detection and management of sarcopenia. The study will assess Quantitative Ultrasound with Radio-Frequency analysis (QUS-RF) as a non-invasive, accessible, and radiation-free tool to characterize muscle morphology, microstructure, and quality. QUS-RF-derived parameters will be compared with established assessments, including body composition, muscle strength, physical performance, and imaging-based measures, to determine their feasibility, reliability, diagnostic accuracy, and responsiveness to change.

The study also includes a 48-week randomized, parallel-group, open-label superiority trial designed to evaluate the effects of a digitally delivered home-based exercise intervention in older adults with sarcopenia or at risk of sarcopenia. Eligible participants will be randomized to either an experimental group receiving a structured home-based exercise program or a control group receiving general physical activity recommendations in line with current guidelines. The exercise program will combine progressive resistance and aerobic training and will be supported by a digital platform allowing remote monitoring, feedback, and supervision. All participants will receive general nutritional advice.

Assessments will be performed at baseline, Week 12, and Week 48. The primary outcome of the randomized trial will be the change in 30-second Chair Stand Test performance, used as an indicator of lower-limb muscle function. Secondary outcomes will include handgrip strength, lower-limb maximal and explosive strength, walking capacity, balance, body composition, QUS-RF-derived muscle parameters, quality of life, mood, physical activity, dietary indicators, blood biomarkers, adherence to the intervention, and safety. A health economic analysis will also be conducted to estimate the potential cost-effectiveness and cost-utility of the proposed diagnostic and therapeutic strategy.

By combining innovative muscle assessment with a scalable digitally supported exercise intervention, the EXEDOS study aims to improve early sarcopenia detection, personalize exercise prescription, and support the development of sustainable strategies to preserve muscle function and independence in older adults.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
192

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Sedentary individuals aged over 50 years.
  • Individuals with sarcopenia, defined as reduced muscle mass assessed by bioelectrical impedance analysis and reduced muscle strength assessed by handgrip strength, according to EWGSOP2 criteria.
  • Individuals at risk of sarcopenia, defined as reduced muscle mass with preserved muscle strength.
  • Healthy age-, sex-, and physical activity-matched older adults eligible for inclusion in the reference cohort.
  • Ability to understand the study procedures and provide written informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Hospitalization within the previous 6 weeks.
  • Substance or alcohol abuse.
  • Use of medications that may impair balance or coordination.
  • Major locomotor impairments.
  • Inability to complete the exercise protocol.
  • Medical, cognitive, or functional conditions that, in the opinion of the investigators, may interfere with safe participation, adherence to the study procedures, or completion of the follow-up assessments.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Sarcopenia - Exercise Intervention
Participants with sarcopenia allocated to the exercise group will receive a 48-week digitally delivered home-based exercise intervention. The program will include progressive resistance exercises using body weight and/or light external loads, combined with moderate-intensity aerobic training. Sessions will be performed three times per week for approximately 45 minutes per session. The intervention will be supported by a digital platform, wearable inertial sensors, heart-rate monitoring, instructional videos, automated feedback, and remote professional supervision. Participants will also receive general nutritional advice.
Behavioral: Digitally delivered home-based exercise intervention
Digitally delivered, home-based, 48-week exercise program combining progressive resistance training and moderate-intensity aerobic training. Participants will perform three sessions per week, each lasting approximately 45 minutes. Resistance exercises will use body weight and/or light external loads and will follow progressive overload principles. Aerobic exercise intensity will be adjusted using heart-rate feedback. The intervention will be delivered through a certified digital therapeutic platform including instructional videos, wearable inertial sensors, heart-rate monitoring, automated feedback, and remote professional supervision through chat or video call. Training progression will be individualized using adherence data, functional assessments, and monitoring outputs.
Active Comparator: Sarcopenia - Control
Participants with sarcopenia allocated to the control group will receive general physical activity recommendations in line with current WHO guidelines and general nutritional advice. They will not receive the digitally delivered individualized exercise intervention. Participants will undergo the same assessment schedule as the intervention group, including baseline, Week 12, and Week 48 evaluations of muscle strength, physical performance, balance, body composition, QUS-RF-derived muscle parameters, questionnaires, dietary monitoring, and blood biomarkers, according to the study protocol.
Behavioral: General physical activity recommendations
Participants allocated to the control condition will receive general physical activity recommendations in line with current WHO guidelines and general nutritional advice. They will not receive the digitally delivered individualized exercise program, wearable sensor-based monitoring, automated feedback, or remote exercise supervision. This intervention is intended to represent a standard recommendation-based comparator condition against which the digitally delivered home-based exercise intervention will be evaluated.
Experimental: Pre-sarcopenia - Exercise Intervention
Participants at risk of sarcopenia, defined by reduced muscle mass with preserved muscle strength, allocated to the exercise group will receive a 48-week digitally delivered home-based exercise intervention. The program will combine progressive resistance training using body weight and/or light external loads with moderate-intensity aerobic training. Sessions will be performed three times per week for approximately 45 minutes per session. Training will be monitored through a digital platform including wearable inertial sensors, heart-rate monitoring, instructional videos, automated feedback, and remote professional supervision. Participants will also receive general nutritional advice.
Behavioral: Digitally delivered home-based exercise intervention
Digitally delivered, home-based, 48-week exercise program combining progressive resistance training and moderate-intensity aerobic training. Participants will perform three sessions per week, each lasting approximately 45 minutes. Resistance exercises will use body weight and/or light external loads and will follow progressive overload principles. Aerobic exercise intensity will be adjusted using heart-rate feedback. The intervention will be delivered through a certified digital therapeutic platform including instructional videos, wearable inertial sensors, heart-rate monitoring, automated feedback, and remote professional supervision through chat or video call. Training progression will be individualized using adherence data, functional assessments, and monitoring outputs.
Active Comparator: Pre-sarcopenia - Control
Participants at risk of sarcopenia, defined by reduced muscle mass with preserved muscle strength, allocated to the control group will receive general physical activity recommendations in line with current WHO guidelines and general nutritional advice. They will not receive the digitally delivered individualized exercise intervention. Participants will complete the same assessment schedule as the intervention group, including baseline, Week 12, and Week 48 evaluations of muscle strength, physical performance, balance, body composition, QUS-RF-derived muscle parameters, questionnaires, dietary monitoring, and blood biomarkers.
Behavioral: General physical activity recommendations
Participants allocated to the control condition will receive general physical activity recommendations in line with current WHO guidelines and general nutritional advice. They will not receive the digitally delivered individualized exercise program, wearable sensor-based monitoring, automated feedback, or remote exercise supervision. This intervention is intended to represent a standard recommendation-based comparator condition against which the digitally delivered home-based exercise intervention will be evaluated.
No Intervention: Healthy Reference Cohort
Healthy age-, sex-, and physical activity-matched older adults will be included as a non-randomized reference cohort. These participants will not receive the digitally delivered exercise intervention and will not be assigned to the control condition. They will undergo the scheduled study assessments to provide reference values for diagnostic and longitudinal comparisons, including evaluations of body composition, QUS-RF-derived muscle parameters, muscle strength, physical performance, balance, questionnaires, dietary monitoring, and blood biomarkers at the planned study time points.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in 30-second Chair Stand Test performance
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 12, and Week 48
Lower-limb muscle function will be assessed using the 30-second Chair Stand Test. Participants will be asked to complete as many sit-to-stand repetitions as possible within 30 seconds using a standardized protocol. The outcome will be expressed as the number of complete repetitions. The primary analysis will evaluate changes from baseline to Week 12 and Week 48 between the exercise intervention and control groups.
Baseline, Week 12, and Week 48

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in handgrip strength
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 12, and Week 48
Maximal handgrip strength will be assessed using a handgrip dynamometer according to a standardized protocol. The outcome will be expressed in kilograms or Newtons, according to the device output. Changes from baseline to Week 12 and Week 48 will be compared between groups.
Baseline, Week 12, and Week 48
Change in lower-limb explosive strength
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 12, and Week 48
Explosive strength and rapid force production will be assessed during lower-limb contractions using standardized dynamometric procedures. The outcome will quantify the ability to rapidly generate force and will be used to characterize neuromuscular adaptations to the intervention.
Baseline, Week 12, and Week 48
Change in 6-Minute Walk Test distance
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 12, and Week 48
Functional walking capacity will be assessed using the 6-Minute Walk Test. Participants will be instructed to walk as far as possible in 6 minutes according to a standardized protocol. The outcome will be expressed as distance walked in meters.
Baseline, Week 12, and Week 48
Change in Mini-Balance Evaluation Systems Test score
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 12, and Week 48
Balance performance will be assessed using the Mini-Balance Evaluation Systems Test. The total score ranges from 0 to 28 points, with higher scores indicating better balance performance. Changes from baseline to Week 12 and Week 48 will be evaluated to assess intervention-related effects on balance.
Baseline, Week 12, and Week 48
Change in fat mass assessed by bioelectrical impedance analysis
Time Frame: Fat mass will be assessed using bioelectrical impedance analysis according to standardized procedures. The outcome will be expressed in percentage. Changes from baseline to Week 12 and Week 48 will be evaluated.
Baseline, Week 12, and Week 48
Fat mass will be assessed using bioelectrical impedance analysis according to standardized procedures. The outcome will be expressed in percentage. Changes from baseline to Week 12 and Week 48 will be evaluated.
Change in lean mass assessed by bioelectrical impedance analysis
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 12, and Week 48
Lean mass will be assessed using bioelectrical impedance analysis according to standardized procedures. The outcome will be expressed in percentage. Changes from baseline to Week 12 and Week 48 will be evaluated.
Baseline, Week 12, and Week 48
Change in skeletal muscle mass index assessed by bioelectrical impedance analysis
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 12, and Week 48
Skeletal muscle mass index will be assessed using bioelectrical impedance analysis according to standardized procedures. The outcome will be expressed as kilograms per square meter. Changes from baseline to Week 12 and Week 48 will be evaluated.
Baseline, Week 12, and Week 48
Change in quantitative ultrasound radio-frequency-derived muscle echo-intensity parameters
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 12, and Week 48
Quantitative ultrasound radio-frequency analysis will be used to assess muscle quality and microstructure. The primary QUS-RF parameter will be muscle echo-intensity, derived from standardized ultrasound acquisitions of selected lower-limb muscles. The outcome will be expressed in arbitrary units or grayscale units, according to the image analysis output. Changes from baseline to Week 12 and Week 48 will be evaluated and related to functional outcomes.
Baseline, Week 12, and Week 48
Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of quantitative ultrasound radio-frequency analysis for sarcopenia classification
Time Frame: Baseline
The diagnostic performance of quantitative ultrasound radio-frequency-derived muscle parameters for classifying sarcopenia status will be evaluated against reference criteria based on muscle mass and muscle strength. Diagnostic accuracy will be expressed as the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve ranges from 0.5 to 1.0 for a clinically useful classifier, with higher values indicating better diagnostic accuracy.
Baseline
Change in 12-Item Short Form Health Survey Physical Component Summary score
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 12, and Week 48
Health-related physical quality of life will be assessed using the 12-Item Short Form Health Survey Physical Component Summary score. The score ranges from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better physical health-related quality of life. Changes from baseline to Week 12 and Week 48 will be evaluated between groups.
Baseline, Week 12, and Week 48
Change in 12-Item Short Form Health Survey Mental Component Summary score
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 12, and Week 48
Health-related mental quality of life will be assessed using the 12-Item Short Form Health Survey Mental Component Summary score. The score ranges from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better mental health-related quality of life. Changes from baseline to Week 12 and Week 48 will be evaluated between groups.
Baseline, Week 12, and Week 48
Change in appendicular skeletal muscle mass index assessed by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 48
Appendicular skeletal muscle mass index will be assessed using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. The index will be calculated as appendicular skeletal muscle mass divided by height squared and expressed in kilograms per square meter. This is a continuous body composition parameter, not a scale score; therefore, no fixed minimum or maximum values apply. Higher values indicate greater appendicular skeletal muscle mass relative to height.
Baseline and Week 48
Change in Profile of Mood States Total Mood Disturbance score
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 12, and Week 48
Mood state will be assessed using the Profile of Mood States questionnaire. The Total Mood Disturbance score will be calculated according to standard scoring procedures. Higher scores indicate greater mood disturbance and therefore a worse mood-related outcome. Changes from baseline to Week 12 and Week 48 will be evaluated between groups.
Baseline, Week 12, and Week 48
Change in C-reactive protein concentration
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 48
Systemic inflammation will be assessed by measuring serum C-reactive protein concentration. The outcome will be expressed in milligrams per liter. Changes from baseline to Week 48 will be evaluated between groups.
Baseline and Week 48

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
I.R.C.C.S Ospedale Galeazzi-Sant'Ambrogio

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Universita di Verona

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
June 3, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
June 3, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
June 3, 2029

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
June 26, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 2, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
July 9, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
July 13, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 9, 2026

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
July 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • GR-2024-12378411

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings