tACS for Working Memory in Schizophrenia

July 8, 2026 updated by: Renrong Wu, Central South University

Efficacy and Mechanisms of Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation in Improving Working Memory in Patients With Schizophrenia

This study is a randomized, single-blind, sham-controlled crossover trial enrolling 30 schizophrenia patients, each receiving one active and one sham tACS session (7-day washout), targeting P3/P4 at individual alpha frequency (2mA, 30min) during a working memory task, with accuracy and reaction time as primary outcomes, alongside EEG and neurophysiological measures, to test the efficacy and mechanisms of individualized alpha-tACS on working memory.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

This study is a randomized, single-blind, sham-controlled, crossover exploratory trial that plans to enroll 30 inpatients with schizophrenia, randomized 1:1 into two groups, with all participants receiving one active and one sham tACS session in a crossover manner separated by a 7-day washout. Stimulation targets the parietal P3/P4 sites at individual alpha frequency, with an intensity of 2 mA and a duration of 30 minutes per session, delivered concurrently with a working memory task (SIRP). Primary outcomes are SIRP accuracy and reaction time, with concurrent task-state EEG recording, along with assessments of clinical symptoms, cognitive function, and neurophysiological markers including ASSR, MMN, and P300. The study aims to explore the efficacy and underlying neural mechanisms of individualized alpha-tACS in improving working memory in schizophrenia.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
30

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • China
    • Hunan
      • Changsha, Hunan, China, 410011
        • Recruiting
        • The second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Aged 18-50 years, meeting the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5) diagnostic criteria for schizophrenia, confirmed by the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-5 (SCID-5).
  • Spatial span T-score <40 on the MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB).
  • Taking 1-2 antipsychotic medications, with stable dosage for at least 1 week prior to enrollment. No use of mood stabilizers, antidepressants, or excessive benzodiazepines (lorazepam equivalent >2 mg/day). The type and dosage of antipsychotic medications remain unchanged during the treatment period.
  • Impaired functioning in daily activities.
  • Willing to participate in this study and provide written informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Previously diagnosed with or comorbid any other DSM-5 mental disorder besides schizophrenia.
  • Presence of significant mood symptoms or substance use disorder (other than caffeine and/or tobacco).
  • Presence of any contraindication to transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS).
  • Received other forms of electrical or magnetic stimulation therapy within 1 month prior to enrollment.
  • History or current presence of any major physical illness, neurological disorder, or traumatic brain injury that may affect brain structure or function.
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding women, or women planning to become pregnant during the study period.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Sham Comparator: sham group
sham stimulation
Device: sham stimulation
Sham stimulation provides only a 15-second ramp-up and ramp-down current at the beginning and end of each session to mimic the initial tingling or itching sensation on the scalp produced by real stimulation, but delivers no effective stimulation current during the main phase of the task period.
Experimental: active group
transcranial alternating current stimulation
Device: transcranial alternating current stimulation
For montage 1, active electrode at P3 (10-10 system), return electrodes at P1, P5, PO3, CP3. For montage 2, active electrode at P4, return electrodes at P2, P6, PO4, CP4. Conductive paste ensures impedance <10 kΩ. Individual alpha frequency is used, calculated before each session from mean EEG at P3/P4 during SIRP task. Stimulation intensity is 2 mA (peak-to-zero) via electric field modeling. Stimulation is delivered during SIRP task, 30 min total per session (including 15s ramp-up/down), with continuous sine wave output.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Working Memory Accuracy
Time Frame: Day 1 (baseline, prior to first intervention); within 15 minutes after Session 1; Day 9 (prior to second intervention, after 7-day washout); within 15 minutes after Session 2.
Assessment of task accuracy on the Sternberg Item Recognition Paradigm (SIRP). Participants are required to judge whether a probe stimulus belongs to a previously memorized set, with memory set sizes of 1 and 5. The outcome is measured as the percentage of correct responses (0-100%) across all trials, with higher scores indicating better working memory performance.
Day 1 (baseline, prior to first intervention); within 15 minutes after Session 1; Day 9 (prior to second intervention, after 7-day washout); within 15 minutes after Session 2.
Working Memory Reaction Time
Time Frame: Day 1 (baseline, prior to first intervention); within 15 minutes after Session 1; Day 9 (prior to second intervention, after 7-day washout); within 15 minutes after Session 2.
Assessment of response speed on the Sternberg Item Recognition Paradigm (SIRP). Participants are required to judge whether a probe stimulus belongs to a previously memorized set, with memory set sizes of 1 and 5. The outcome is measured as the mean response latency for correct responses only, calculated from stimulus onset to the participant's button press, with shorter times indicating faster processing speed.
Day 1 (baseline, prior to first intervention); within 15 minutes after Session 1; Day 9 (prior to second intervention, after 7-day washout); within 15 minutes after Session 2.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changes in MCCB Performance
Time Frame: Baseline, on the day after each of the two interventions
Assessment of cognitive function using the MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB), a standardized cognitive assessment tool designed for schizophrenia and other neuropsychiatric conditions. The MCCB evaluates 9 cognitive domains: attention, information processing speed, verbal learning and memory, visual learning and memory, spatial working memory, reasoning and problem solving, social cognition, executive function, and fine motor skills. The overall cognitive composite score ranges from 20 to 100 (T-score), with higher scores indicating better cognitive performance.
Baseline, on the day after each of the two interventions
Changes in Positive and Negative Symptom Scale (PANSS) Scores
Time Frame: Before and one week after each of the two interventions.
Scores range from 30 to 210, with higher scores indicating more severe positive and negative symptoms.
Before and one week after each of the two interventions.
Changes in Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS) Scores
Time Frame: Before and one week after each of the two interventions.
Scores range from 0 to 120; higher scores indicate more severe negative symptoms.
Before and one week after each of the two interventions.
Changes in Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia (CDSS) Scores
Time Frame: Before and one week after each of the two interventions.
Scores range from 0 to 27; higher scores indicate more severe affective symptoms.
Before and one week after each of the two interventions.
Changes in Brain Function
Time Frame: Baseline, on the day after each of the two interventions.
Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), based on blood oxygen level-dependent (BOLD) contrast, can detect changes in blood oxygenation and analyze changes in brain function after intervention.
Baseline, on the day after each of the two interventions.
Changes in Neuroelectrophysiological Signals
Time Frame: Baseline, 30 minutes after each of the two interventions.
Changes in neuroelectrophysiological signals are collected through task-based electroencephalography (EEG).
Baseline, 30 minutes after each of the two interventions.
Changes in 40Hz Auditory Steady-State Response (40Hz-ASSR)
Time Frame: Baseline, 30 minutes after each of the two interventions.
The 40Hz auditory steady-state response recorded by EEG, including evoked power and inter-trial phase coherence, will be measured. The unit of measurement for evoked power is μV², and for coherence is unitless.
Baseline, 30 minutes after each of the two interventions.
Changes in Mismatch Negativity (MMN)
Time Frame: Baseline, 30 minutes after each of the two interventions.
Mismatch negativity amplitude recorded by EEG using an oddball paradigm will be measured. The unit of measurement is microvolts (μV).
Baseline, 30 minutes after each of the two interventions.
Changes in P300 Event-Related Potential
Time Frame: Baseline, 30 minutes after each of the two interventions.
P300 amplitude recorded by EEG using an oddball paradigm will be measured. The unit of measurement is microvolts (μV).
Baseline, 30 minutes after each of the two interventions.
Hallucination and Delusion Visual Analog Scale (HD-VAS) Score
Time Frame: Within 15 minutes after completion of Session 1; within 15 minutes after completion of Session 2.
Assessment of acute post-intervention changes in hallucination and delusion severity using a patient-rated visual analog scale (VAS). The scale consists of a 0-100 mm horizontal line, on which participants mark their current symptom severity. The distance (in millimeters) from the left anchor ("no symptoms") to the participant's mark is measured with a ruler. This scale serves as a supplementary measure to the PANSS to capture immediate symptom changes following each intervention. Scores range from 0 to 100 mm, with higher scores indicating more severe hallucinations and delusions.
Within 15 minutes after completion of Session 1; within 15 minutes after completion of Session 2.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Central South University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
July 6, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
October 31, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 31, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
July 2, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 8, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
July 14, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
July 14, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 8, 2026

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
July 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • LYG20260081

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings