Development and External Validation of a Machine Learning Model for Pre-Endoscopic Prediction of Montreal Disease Extent (E1/E2/E3) in Ulcerative Colitis Using Symptoms, Signs, and Laboratory Tests: A Multicenter Retrospective Observational Study

August 15, 2026 updated by: Kai Liu, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine

Development and External Validation of a Machine Learning Model for Pre-Endoscopic Prediction of Montreal Disease Extent (E1/E2/E3) in Ulcerative Colitis

This multicenter retrospective observational study aims to develop and externally validate a machine learning model that predicts Montreal ulcerative colitis (UC) disease extent (E1: limited/proctitis; E2: left-sided; E3: extensive) using pre-endoscopic clinical information, including symptoms, signs, and laboratory tests. The model is intended to assist clinical assessment before endoscopic confirmation and is not designed to replace colonoscopy or histopathology. Data from development centers (Centers A and B) will be used for model development with nested cross-validation; data from independent external centers (Centers C and D) will be used for external validation only.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Active, not recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
1500

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Adults with UC from four hospitals in China (2020-2025). Development cohort: Centers A (Dongfang Hospital, BUCM) and B (Dongzhimen Hospital, BUCM). External validation cohort: Centers C (BUCM Third Affiliated Hospital) and D (Yantai Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine).

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Confirmed diagnosis of ulcerative colitis by endoscopy ± histopathology.
  2. Montreal disease extent classifiable as E1 (limited), E2 (intermediate/left-sided), or E3 (extensive) and mapped to study labels 1/2/3.
  3. Pre-endoscopic baseline data available: demographics, symptoms, signs, and laboratory tests used as model predictors.
  4. Predictors collected before or independent of endoscopic findings used for the outcome label (endoscopic extent not used as input).
  5. One index visit per patient (duplicate/non-index visits excluded).

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Non-UC diagnosis or Montreal extent not assignable.
  2. Missing patient identifier/linkage or unlabelable outcome.
  3. Incomplete endoscopic gold standard for Montreal extent classification.
  4. Duplicate or non-index visits.
  5. Critical predictor data unavailable and not handled by the prespecified modeling pipeline

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Macro one-vs-rest area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (macro AUC-OVR) for three-class Montreal extent prediction (E1 vs E2 vs E3) in the external validation cohort (n=247).
Time Frame: At index visit / endoscopic assessment
At index visit / endoscopic assessment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Beijing University of Chinese Medicine

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Dongzhimen Hospital, Beijing
Dongfang Hospital Beijing University of Chinese Medicine
Beijing University of Chinese Medicine Third Affiliated Hospital
Yantai Penglai Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
November 20, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
August 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
September 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
July 19, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 19, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
July 23, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
August 18, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 15, 2026

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
August 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 2026BZYLL0603

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Due to the restrictions of the informed consent form approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB), patients were only consented for the use of their data in this specific clinical prediction model study. Broad data sharing was not covered in the original ethical approval, and obtaining re-consent from all 247 participants is not feasible.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings