SleeperOne® 5 Intraosseous Anesthesia in MIH (CCLAD-MIH)

August 4, 2026 updated by: Burcu Nihan Yüksel, Ankara University

Comparison of SleeperOne® 5-Assisted Intraosseous and Conventional Local Anesthesia for Pain and Anxiety Control in Children With Molar-Incisor Hypomineralization: A Randomized Split-Mouth Clinical Trial

This randomized split-mouth clinical trial evaluates whether computer-controlled intraosseous anesthesia delivered with the SleeperOne® 5 system reduces pain perception and dental anxiety compared with conventional local anesthesia during restorative treatment of children with molar-incisor hypomineralization (MIH). Thirty-five children received both anesthesia techniques in separate treatment sessions. Pain perception, behavioral responses, dental anxiety, pulse rate, and oxygen saturation were assessed at predefined time points.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Molar-incisor hypomineralization (MIH) is a developmental enamel defect that frequently presents with hypersensitivity, post-eruptive enamel breakdown, and an increased risk of restorative treatment failure. Achieving effective local anesthesia in children with MIH can be challenging because hypersensitive teeth often exhibit increased pain during anesthetic administration and restorative procedures. These factors may compromise patient cooperation and the quality of dental treatment.

Computer-controlled local anesthetic delivery systems have been developed to improve injection comfort by controlling the rate and pressure of anesthetic administration. The SleeperOne® 5 system allows computer-controlled intraosseous anesthesia and may provide more effective pain control than conventional local anesthesia during restorative treatment of MIH-affected teeth.

The purpose of this study was to compare SleeperOne® 5-assisted intraosseous anesthesia with conventional local anesthesia in children undergoing restorative treatment of permanent first molars affected by MIH.

The study was conducted as a randomized split-mouth clinical trial in which each participant received both anesthetic techniques during separate treatment sessions. The order of the interventions was determined using computer-generated randomization, allowing each participant to serve as his or her own control. All clinical procedures were performed under standardized conditions by the same operator.

The study was designed to evaluate whether computer-controlled intraosseous anesthesia could improve pain control and patient comfort during restorative treatment of children with MIH compared with conventional local anesthesia.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

35

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Ankara, Turkey (Türkiye), 06560
        • Ankara University Faculty of Dentistry

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Children aged 8 to 14 years.
  • Bilateral symmetrical MIH-affected permanent first molars requiring restorative treatment.
  • MIH diagnosed according to EAPD criteria.
  • Positive or definitely positive Frankl Behavior Rating Scale.
  • Parent or guardian provided written informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Acute pulpal or periapical pathology.
  • Developmental dental anomalies other than MIH.
  • Allergy to local anesthetic agents.
  • Medical contraindication to local anesthesia.
  • Analgesic or anti-inflammatory drug use within 24 hours before treatment.
  • Cognitive or communication disorders affecting study assessments.
  • Uncooperative behavior.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: SleeperOne® 5-Assisted Intraosseous Anesthesia
Computer-controlled intraosseous anesthesia delivered using the SleeperOne® 5 system during restorative treatment of MIH-affected permanent first molars.
Computer-controlled intraosseous local anesthesia delivered using the SleeperOne® 5 system during restorative treatment of MIH-affected permanent first molars.
Active Comparator: Conventional Local Anesthesia
Conventional local anesthesia administered using a standard dental syringe during restorative treatment of MIH-affected permanent first molars.
Conventional local anesthesia administered using a standard dental syringe during restorative treatment of MIH-affected permanent first molars.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain Perception During Anesthetic Administration
Time Frame: Immediately after completion of local anesthesia administration (T1)
Pain intensity during local anesthetic administration assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), a 10-cm scale ranging from 0 to 10, where 0 indicates no pain and 10 indicates the worst pain imaginable. Higher scores indicate greater pain intensity.
Immediately after completion of local anesthesia administration (T1)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Behavioral Pain Response
Time Frame: Immediately after completion of local anesthesia administration and immediately after completion of the restorative treatment procedure.
Behavioral pain response assessed using the Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability (FLACC) Scale. The FLACC Scale ranges from 0 to 10, with scores of 0 indicating no pain-related behavioral distress and scores of 10 indicating severe pain-related behavioral distress. Higher scores indicate greater pain-related behavioral distress.
Immediately after completion of local anesthesia administration and immediately after completion of the restorative treatment procedure.
Dental Anxiety
Time Frame: Immediately before local anesthesia administration, immediately after completion of local anesthesia administration, and immediately after completion of the restorative treatment procedure.
Dental anxiety assessed using the Children's Fear Survey Schedule-Dental Subscale (CFSS-DS). The CFSS-DS score ranges from 15 to 75, with higher scores indicating greater dental anxiety.
Immediately before local anesthesia administration, immediately after completion of local anesthesia administration, and immediately after completion of the restorative treatment procedure.
Pulse Rate
Time Frame: Before local anesthesia administration (T0), immediately after local anesthesia administration (T1), and immediately after restorative treatment (T2).
Physiological response assessed by pulse rate (beats per minute)
Before local anesthesia administration (T0), immediately after local anesthesia administration (T1), and immediately after restorative treatment (T2).
Peripheral Oxygen Saturation (SpO₂)
Time Frame: Immediately before local anesthesia administration, immediately after completion of local anesthesia administration, and immediately after completion of the restorative treatment procedure.
Physiological response assessed by peripheral oxygen saturation measured by pulse oximetry as a percentage (%). Higher values indicate greater oxygen saturation.
Immediately before local anesthesia administration, immediately after completion of local anesthesia administration, and immediately after completion of the restorative treatment procedure.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 23, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 28, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

August 3, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 6, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 4, 2026

Last Verified

August 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 36290600/57/2023
  • TDK-2024-3458 (Other Grant/Funding Number: Scientific Research Projects Coordination Unit of Ankara University)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

IPD Plan Description

The plan for sharing de-identified individual participant data has not yet been determined and will be considered in accordance with institutional and ethical requirements.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.