Novel Integrated Tube-Bougie Prototype for Endotracheal Intubation in Airway Simulation (ITBP)
A Prospective Randomized Crossover Simulation Study Comparing an Integrated Tube-Bougie Prototype With Standard Stilet-Assisted and Gum Elastic Bougie Assisted Endotracheal Intubation
Endotracheal intubation is a critical airway management procedure that frequently requires adjunctive devices, such as stylets or elastic bougies, to facilitate successful tube placement. Although videolaryngoscopy has become increasingly common, access to videolaryngoscopes remains limited in certain clinical settings, particularly in prehospital and resource-constrained environments. Consequently, stylets and bougies continue to play an essential role in airway management. To address this need, we developed a novel integrated tube-bougie prototype that combines the guidance function of an elastic bougie with an endotracheal tube into a single device.
This prospective, randomized, crossover simulation study is designed to compare the performance of the integrated tube-bougie prototype with conventional stylet-assisted and elastic bougie-assisted endotracheal intubation. Emergency medicine residents will perform intubations using all three techniques in both normal and difficult airway simulation scenarios according to a randomized crossover sequence.
The primary outcome is the time to successful endotracheal intubation. Secondary outcomes include first-attempt intubation success, perceived procedural difficulty assessed using a visual analog scale (VAS), incidence of esophageal intubation, dental trauma, and evaluation of the learning curve using cumulative sum (CUSUM) analysis.
The findings could contribute to the development of alternative airway assistive equipment for emergency airway management and training.
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Endotracheal intubation is one of the most commonly performed advanced airway procedures in emergency and critical care. Successful intubation depends not only on adequate visualization of the glottis but also on successful advancement of the endotracheal tube through the vocal cords. Adjunctive devices, such as stylets and elastic bougies, are widely used to facilitate tube placement. However, these devices require additional procedural steps and device exchanges, which may increase procedural complexity and prolong intubation time.
EPATS (Integrated Tube-Bougie Prototype) is a novel airway device developed to integrate the guidance function of an elastic bougie directly into an endotracheal tube. By combining both functions into a single device, EPATS is intended to simplify the intubation process while preserving the advantages of bougie-assisted intubation.
This prospective, randomized, crossover simulation study will evaluate the performance of EPATS compared with conventional elastic bougie-assisted and stylet-assisted endotracheal intubation. Emergency medicine residents will perform endotracheal intubation using all three techniques in both normal and difficult airway simulation scenarios according to a randomized crossover sequence. Before study initiation, all participants will receive standardized training in the use of EPATS and the elastic bougie appropriate to their level of experience. All intubation procedures will be performed under standardized simulation conditions.
The primary outcome is the time to successful endotracheal intubation. Secondary outcomes include first-attempt intubation success, perceived procedural difficulty assessed using a visual analog scale (VAS), incidence of esophageal intubation, dental trauma, and evaluation of the learning curve using cumulative sum (CUSUM) analysis.
This study will determine whether EPATS improves procedural efficiency and intubation performance compared with conventional intubation adjuncts in a standardized simulation environment.
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Huseyin Cahit Halhalli, MD
- Phone Number: +902622252700
- Email: huseyin.halhalli@sbu.edu.tr
Study Locations
-
-
Kocaeli
-
Köseköy, Kocaeli, Turkey (Türkiye), 41060
- University of Health Sciences, Kocaeli City Hospital
-
Contact:
- Huseyin Cahit Halhalli, MD
- Phone Number: +902622252700
- Email: huseyin.halhalli@sbu.edu.tr
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Professional Status: Being an Emergency Medicine Resident actively undergoing specialty training at the University of Health Sciences, Kocaeli City Hospital, Department of Emergency Medicine.
- Voluntary Participation: Voluntarily agreeing to participate in the study and providing written informed consent prior to enrollment.
- Postgraduate year (PGY) 1-4 residents.
- Willing and able to provide written informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Refusal to Participate: Declining to participate or refusing to provide written informed consent.
- Physical or Neurological Limitations: Having any pre-existing physical, motor, or neurological impairment that could interfere with manual dexterity, procedural performance, or airway management simulation (e.g., hand injuries, tremors, etc.).
- Inability to complete all study procedures.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
- Masking: Single
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: EPATS
Participants will perform endotracheal intubation using the EPATS (Integrated Tube-Bougie Prototype) in both normal and difficult airway simulation scenarios.
|
The novel integrated tube-bougie prototype developed for endotracheal intubation.
|
|
Active Comparator: Standard Gum Elastic Bougie
Participants will perform endotracheal intubation using a standard gum elastic bougie in both normal and difficult airway simulation scenarios.
|
Standard gum elastic bougie used as an intubation adjunct.
|
|
Active Comparator: Standard Stylet
Participants will perform endotracheal intubation using a standard stylet in both normal and difficult airway simulation scenarios.
|
Standard intubating stylet used as an intubation adjunct.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Time to successful endotracheal intubation
Time Frame: During the study procedure
|
The insertion and removal time (seconds) of the laryngoscope from the mouth will be recorded.
|
During the study procedure
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
First Pass Success (FPS)
Time Frame: During the study procedure
|
Successful endotracheal intubation without removing the laryngoscope from the mouth.
Attempts exceeding 60 seconds will be considered unsuccessful.
|
During the study procedure
|
|
Difficulty Assessment (VAS)
Time Frame: At the end of the study procedure
|
The practitioner's difficulty perception will be measured using a 0-100 mm visual analog scale.
|
At the end of the study procedure
|
|
Complications (Dental trauma and Esophageal intubation)
Time Frame: During the study procedure
|
Complications for each procedure (dental trauma and esophageal intubation) will be determined by the researchers.
|
During the study procedure
|
|
Learning Curve (CUSUM)
Time Frame: During the study procedure
|
For each participant, success/failure data will be used for analysis; this analysis will be considered exploratory.
The number of endotracheal intubation attempts required to learn will be recorded in the data collection.
Sequential intubation performance data will be analyzed using cumulative sum (CUSUM) analysis.
|
During the study procedure
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Collaborators
Collaborators
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Estimated)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- ITBP-2026-01
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
IPD Sharing Time Frame
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type
- STUDY_PROTOCOL
- SAP
- ANALYTIC_CODE
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.