High-Intensity Interval Training for Walking and Function Across Different Multiple Sclerosis Disability Levels

August 14, 2026 updated by: ISMAIL KARA, Hacettepe University

The Effect of High-Intensity Interval Training on Maximum Walking Distance and Functional Parameters in Patients With Multiple Sclerosis at Different Disability Levels

Multiple Sclerosis (MS) is a chronic neurological disease that can affect daily functioning, mobility, and overall quality of life. High-Intensity Interval Training (HIIT) is known to be a time-efficient exercise approach that improves exercise capacity and reduces fatigue in MS. However, current research lacks sufficient data on how HIIT affects individuals with different levels of disability.

The main purpose of this study is to evaluate the effects of a stationary bicycle-based HIIT protocol on maximum walking distance, fatigue, balance, muscle strength, endurance, gait speed, and quality of life in MS patients across three different disability levels: mild, moderate, and severe (classified according to Expanded Disability Status Scale - EDSS scores).

Participants will complete a cycle ergometer-based HIIT program. Assessments will be conducted at three time points:

Before starting the exercise program (baseline)

Immediately after completing the program (post-treatment)

4 weeks after the completion of the program (follow-up)

To ensure unbiased results, a triple-blind design will be used, meaning the outcome assessor, the treating physiotherapist, and the data analyst will be blinded to group assignments. The findings aim to help clinicians tailor personalized, effective HIIT protocols based on a patient's specific disability level rather than using a standardized, one-size-fits-all approach in MS rehabilitation.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
30

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Be between the ages of 18 and 65,
  • Have been diagnosed with MS by a treating physician,
  • Have an EDSS score between 0 and 6.5,
  • Not having experienced a relapse within the last 3 months,
  • Not having severe lower extremity contractures, severe spasticity (≥3 on the Modified Ashworth Scale), or an acute orthopedic problem that would prevent the participant from pedaling on a bicycle ergometer,
  • Having a Mini Mental State Examination score of ≥24.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Having a severe cardiovascular, orthopedic, respiratory, or metabolic disease,
  • Having an additional neurological condition,
  • Being pregnant or suspecting pregnancy,
  • Having received a botulinum toxin injection within the last 3 months,
  • Having a COMPASS-31 total score greater than 13.6

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Mild Disability Group (EDSS 0 to <=2.5)
Behavioral: High-Intensity Interval Training
All exercise sessions in our study will be conducted using a bicycle ergometer (Monark Cardio Care 827 X, Monark Exercise AB, Sweden). The HIIT protocol will consist of five 3-minute high-intensity intervals performed at 80-100 revolutions per minute, corresponding to 85-90% of maximum heart rate. Between these intervals, active rest periods will be implemented, during which cadence is reduced to 50-60 revolutions per minute for 1.5 minutes to lower heart rate to 50-60% of maximum heart rate. The total training duration is planned to be 20 minutes, consisting of a 2-minute warm-up at the beginning and a 2-minute cool-down at the end. Sessions will be conducted three times a week. The total treatment duration is planned to be 8 weeks.
Experimental: Moderate Disability Group (EDSS 3.0 to <=4.5)
Behavioral: High-Intensity Interval Training
All exercise sessions in our study will be conducted using a bicycle ergometer (Monark Cardio Care 827 X, Monark Exercise AB, Sweden). The HIIT protocol will consist of five 3-minute high-intensity intervals performed at 80-100 revolutions per minute, corresponding to 85-90% of maximum heart rate. Between these intervals, active rest periods will be implemented, during which cadence is reduced to 50-60 revolutions per minute for 1.5 minutes to lower heart rate to 50-60% of maximum heart rate. The total training duration is planned to be 20 minutes, consisting of a 2-minute warm-up at the beginning and a 2-minute cool-down at the end. Sessions will be conducted three times a week. The total treatment duration is planned to be 8 weeks.
Experimental: Severe Disability Group (EDSS 5.0 to <=6.5)
Behavioral: High-Intensity Interval Training
All exercise sessions in our study will be conducted using a bicycle ergometer (Monark Cardio Care 827 X, Monark Exercise AB, Sweden). The HIIT protocol will consist of five 3-minute high-intensity intervals performed at 80-100 revolutions per minute, corresponding to 85-90% of maximum heart rate. Between these intervals, active rest periods will be implemented, during which cadence is reduced to 50-60 revolutions per minute for 1.5 minutes to lower heart rate to 50-60% of maximum heart rate. The total training duration is planned to be 20 minutes, consisting of a 2-minute warm-up at the beginning and a 2-minute cool-down at the end. Sessions will be conducted three times a week. The total treatment duration is planned to be 8 weeks.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Maximum Walking Distance
Time Frame: Assessed at baseline (pre-intervention), immediately post-intervention (at 8 weeks), and 4 weeks post-intervention (follow-up)
Maximum walking distance (in meters) will be objectively estimated using a predictive model previously developed by our research team.
Assessed at baseline (pre-intervention), immediately post-intervention (at 8 weeks), and 4 weeks post-intervention (follow-up)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Fatigue
Time Frame: Baseline, immediately post-intervention, and 4 weeks follow-up
Fatigue will be evaluated with the Fatigue Severity Scale. This scale also assesses the fatigue severity of patients through 9 questions. Each question has a score ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 7 (strongly agree). The fatigue severity scale score is determined by calculating the average value of the responses given to these 9 questions. A higher score indicates greater fatigue severity.
Baseline, immediately post-intervention, and 4 weeks follow-up
Muscle Strength
Time Frame: Baseline, immediately post-intervention, and 4 weeks follow-up
It will be evaluated using a hand-held dynamometer. In this test, which will be performed in a long-sitting position with the hips in 90 degrees of flexion and the knees in extension, the measuring device (Lafayette Instrument Company, Lafayette IN, USA) will be placed on the sole of the foot. The patient will then be asked to press their foot downward, and the result will be recorded.
Baseline, immediately post-intervention, and 4 weeks follow-up
Muscular Endurance
Time Frame: Baseline, immediately post-intervention, and 4 weeks follow-up
It will be evaluated through repetitive muscle contraction tests.
Baseline, immediately post-intervention, and 4 weeks follow-up
Gait Speed
Time Frame: Baseline, immediately post-intervention, and 4 weeks follow-up
The walking speeds of the participants will be evaluated using the 10-Meter Walk Test, whose validity and reliability have been proven in clinical studies. During the assessment, participants will be asked to walk along a 10-meter straight and obstacle-free corridor at their normal pace, and the elapsed time will be recorded using a stopwatch.
Baseline, immediately post-intervention, and 4 weeks follow-up
Health-Related Quality of Life
Time Frame: Baseline, immediately post-intervention, and 4 weeks follow-up
It will be evaluated using the Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale-29. The questionnaire assesses the impact of MS on daily life over the past two weeks. Responses are recorded on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 ("not at all") to 5 ("extremely").
Baseline, immediately post-intervention, and 4 weeks follow-up
balance
Time Frame: Baseline, immediately post-intervention, and 4 weeks follow-up
Objective balance assessments of the participants will be performed using the TecnoBody PK200 Balance Device. As part of the assessment protocol, patients will sequentially undergo stabilometric static balance, the Romberg test in eyes-open and eyes-closed positions, single-leg stance on the right and left, and dynamic balance tests.
Baseline, immediately post-intervention, and 4 weeks follow-up
Dynamic Balance
Time Frame: Baseline, immediately post-intervention, and 4 weeks follow-up
It will be evaluated using the Community Balance and Mobility Scale. This scale evaluates balance and mobility status across 13 tasks that involve advanced functional balance and mobility activities. Each item is scored between 0 and 5 (0 = unable to perform, 5 = able to perform independently). Item 12 is scored from 0 to 6, with an additional point added if a basket is carried while descending the stairs. Higher scores indicate better balance and mobility.
Baseline, immediately post-intervention, and 4 weeks follow-up

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Hacettepe University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
August 17, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 31, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
January 31, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
August 4, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 14, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
August 18, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
August 18, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 14, 2026

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
August 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • Hacettepe-PT-MS-01

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings