Effectiveness of Biofeedback-Assisted Pelvic Floor Muscle Training on Sexual Function and Quality of Life in Patient After Hysterectomy

August 20, 2026 updated by: Rana Hosny Abd Elhamid Ghazy, Kafrelsheikh University
The purpose of this study is to determine the effectiveness of biofeedback-assisted pelvic floor muscle training in improving pelvic floor muscle strength, decreasing urinary incontinence symptoms, reducing genital prolaps and enhancing the quality of life in women after hysterectomy.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Hysterectomy, the surgical removal of the uterus, remains one of the most frequently performed gynecological procedures worldwide, indicated for both malignant and benign conditions.

Pelvic floor dysfunction (PFD) is a common complication after hysterectomy, manifesting as urinary incontinence, pelvic organ prolapse, and colorectal symptoms.

Conventional pelvic floor rehabilitation focuses on pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT), widely known as Kegel exercises, to strengthen weakened muscles and improve continence.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
70

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • Egypt
    • Kafrelsheikh
      • Kafr ash Shaykh, Kafrelsheikh, Egypt, 33516
        • Recruiting
        • Kafrelsheikh University (Faculty of Physical Therapy)
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Women aged 45-50 years.
  • Body Mass Index (BMI) within the range of 18.5 to 29.9 kg/m².
  • History of total or subtotal hysterectomy for benign conditions within the past 6 months.
  • Abdominal hysterectomy.
  • Women have menstrual cycle.
  • Presenting with at least one symptom of pelvic floor dysfunction (e.g., stress urinary incontinence and genital prolapse).
  • Willing to participate and provide informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Hysterectomy performed for malignant conditions.
  • Prior pelvic floor rehabilitation.
  • Neurological disorders affecting muscle control.
  • Pelvic infection or current urinary tract infection (UTI).
  • Inability to follow instructions or adhere to the program.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Group A
Participants will undergo standard post hysterectomy care protocol with electromyographic (EMG)-based biofeedback guidance, using a vaginal sensor to provide real-time visual and/or auditory feedback on pelvic floor muscles contractions.
Procedure: Biofeedback + standarded post hysterectomy care protocol
Participants will undergo standard post hysterectomy care protocol with electromyographic (EMG)-based biofeedback guidance, using a vaginal sensor to provide real-time visual and/or auditory feedback on pelvic floor muscles contractions.
Active Comparator: Group B
Participants will perform undergo standard post hysterectomy core protocol without biofeedback assistance.
Procedure: Standard post hysterectomy care protocol
Participants will perform undergo standard post hysterectomy core protocol without biofeedback assistance.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI)
Time Frame: 12 weeks of intervention
Female sexual function will be assessed using the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI), a validated 19-item questionnaire evaluating six domains: desire, arousal, lubrication, orgasm, satisfaction, and pain. The total FSFI score ranges from 2 to 36, with higher scores indicating better sexual function. The change in total FSFI score from baseline to the end of the 12-week intervention will be compared between the two study groups.
12 weeks of intervention

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pelvic Floor Muscle Strength
Time Frame: 12 weeks of intervention
Pelvic floor muscle strength will be assessed using an electromyographic (EMG)-based biofeedback device with an intravaginal sensor. Peak EMG amplitude during maximal voluntary pelvic floor muscle contractions will be recorded as an objective measure of pelvic floor muscle strength. The change from baseline to the end of the 12-week intervention will be compared between the two study groups.
12 weeks of intervention
Urinary Incontinence Severity
Time Frame: 12 weeks of intervention
Urinary incontinence severity will be assessed using the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Urinary Incontinence Short Form (ICIQ-UI SF). The questionnaire evaluates the frequency and severity of urinary leakage and its impact on daily life. Total scores range from 0 to 21, with higher scores indicating greater severity. The change in ICIQ-UI SF score from baseline to the end of the 12-week intervention will be compared between the two study groups.
12 weeks of intervention
Pelvic Floor-Related Quality of Life
Time Frame: 12 weeks of intervention
Pelvic floor-related quality of life will be assessed using the Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire-Short Form 7 (PFIQ-7). The questionnaire assesses the impact of urinary, colorectal, and pelvic organ prolapse symptoms on daily activities and quality of life. Scores range from 0 to 300, with higher scores indicating greater negative impact on quality of life. The change in PFIQ-7 score from baseline to the end of the 12-week intervention will be compared between the two study groups.
12 weeks of intervention
Pelvic Organ Prolapse Severity
Time Frame: 12 weeks of intervention
Pelvic organ prolapse severity will be assessed using the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP-Q) system. POP-Q measurements will be performed at baseline and after the 12-week intervention to objectively assess changes in pelvic organ support and prolapse stage. Changes in POP-Q measurements and prolapse stage will be compared between the two study groups.
12 weeks of intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Kafrelsheikh University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
January 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
October 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
October 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
August 20, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 20, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
August 25, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
August 25, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 20, 2026

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
August 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • KFSIRB200-871

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

The data will be available upon a reasonable request from the corresponding author after the end of study for one year.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

After the end of study for one year.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

The data will be available upon a reasonable request from the corresponding author.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings