Postoperative Edge (RapidArc) Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Spinal Metastases

August 30, 2026 updated by: Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital

Prognostic Study of Postoperative Edge (RapidArc) Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Spinal Metastases From Solid Tumors

This study observes the effectiveness of high-precision radiation therapy using the Edge system after surgery for patients with spinal metastases. Spinal metastases can press on the spinal cord and cause pain, weakness, or paralysis. This treatment uses higher doses of radiation in fewer sessions (hypofractionated stereotactic body radiotherapy) delivered precisely by the Edge machine to target remaining tumor cells while protecting the spinal cord. The study aims to see if this approach improves local tumor control, improves neurological function, shortens treatment duration, and improves quality of life in these patients. The study is observational, meaning patients receive standard care, and data is collected to evaluate the outcomes.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

This is a single-center, prospective, observational cohort study conducted at Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital to evaluate the clinical outcomes of postoperative Edge (RapidArc) Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) in patients with spinal metastases from solid tumors. A total of 50 patients with postoperative metastatic epidural spinal cord compression (MESCC) will be enrolled. The treatment protocol prescribes a total dose of 35 Gy in 5 fractions (7 Gy per fraction) delivered using the Edge system. The Edge system features sub-millimeter precision, six-dimensional dynamic positioning, and optical surface monitoring (OSMS), which allows for a steep dose gradient, high biological effective dose (BED), and maximal spinal cord protection. The study will evaluate local control rate (LC) and neurological improvement (Frankel score) at 3 months as the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes include 1-year and 2-year LC, neurological deterioration-free survival (NDFS), overall survival (OS), and quality of life (EORTC QLQ-C30). Adverse events including acute radiation myelitis and esophagitis will be monitored. Data will be analyzed using SPSS 27.0 and R 4.3.2, with survival curves generated via the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression models used for prognostic factor analysis.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
50

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • China
    • Tianjin Municipality
      • Tianjin, Tianjin Municipality, China
        • Recruiting
        • 300060
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients diagnosed with spinal metastases from solid tumors who underwent surgery and had residual metastatic epidural spinal cord compression (MESCC) requiring postoperative radiotherapy. All participants were enrolled at Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age 18 to 80 years, any sex.
  2. Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) >= 60 or ECOG Performance Status <= 2.
  3. Confirmed spinal metastases from solid tumors by pathology or imaging (MRI/CT).
  4. Postoperative imaging confirming residual epidural spinal cord compression (MESCC) requiring adjuvant radiotherapy.
  5. Number of lesions <= 5, and maximum diameter of a single lesion <= 5 cm.
  6. Interval between surgery and radiotherapy <= 4 weeks.
  7. Signed informed consent and willingness to participate in the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Uncontrolled primary tumor (e.g., extensive metastasis or progressive disease).
  2. Concurrent brain metastases or other active malignancies.
  3. Pathological fracture or severe spinal instability requiring emergency surgical intervention.
  4. Prior cumulative spinal cord radiation dose exceeding the tolerance threshold (e.g., previous spinal cord Dmax >= 45 Gy).
  5. Contraindications to radiotherapy (e.g., severe cardiopulmonary dysfunction, coagulation disorders).
  6. Severe postoperative complications (e.g., infection, poor wound healing) requiring delayed radiotherapy.
  7. Incomplete or unreliable medical records from external hospitals.
  8. Pregnant or lactating women.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Edge SBRT Group
Participants received postoperative stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) using the Edge system, prescribed as 35 Gy in 5 fractions (7 Gy per fraction).
Radiation: Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy
Postoperative stereotactic body radiotherapy using the Edge system, delivered as 35 Gy in 5 fractions (7 Gy per fraction).
Other Names:
  • Edge System

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Local Control Rate (LC)
Time Frame: 3 months post-treatment
Proportion of patients with local tumor control, assessed by MRI showing residual tumor volume changes at 3 months post-treatment.
3 months post-treatment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Neurological Deterioration-Free Survival (NDFS)
Time Frame: 1 year and 2 years
Time from treatment initiation to neurological deterioration or death.
1 year and 2 years
Overall Survival (OS)
Time Frame: 1 year and 2 years
Time from treatment initiation to death from any cause.
1 year and 2 years
Quality of Life (QoL)
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 months, 1 year, and 2 years post-treatment
Change in quality of life scores assessed by the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire.
Baseline, 3 months, 1 year, and 2 years post-treatment
Incidence of Adverse Events
Time Frame: Up to 2 years post-treatment
Incidence of acute radiation myelitis, esophagitis, vertebral fractures, and skin reactions, graded according to CTCAE v5.0.
Up to 2 years post-treatment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Xu Liming, MD, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
June 1, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
March 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
September 30, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
August 30, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 30, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
September 3, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
September 3, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 30, 2026

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
August 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • E20251145

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Individual participant data (IPD) will not be shared to protect patient confidentiality and adhere to institutional data protection policies.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings